CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, deceased/not found, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #63

[afitzy]

Did anyone see the report about this in the Stamford Advocate?

Their reporter isn't the brightest bulb imo but even she would not be so stupid as to post a sealed custody report.

What is so absolutely disgraceful about this entire episode is the Defence has been trying to bring that report front and centre since the beginning of this sorry trial.

I fully blame Judge R for not banning mention of this report as it wasn't enough to simply say it couldn't be placed into evidence.

Shameful display and I hope there are consequences if this did play out as described by Atty manning.
MOO

 

[Megnut]

MOO

The judge has been clear and forceful about this report remaining sealed.

That it was disseminated in his courtroom by the defendant who was given access by Counsel -- whoa.

No wonder the State asked for an immediate sidebar.

 

[nodamselindistress]

Their reporter isn't the brightest bulb imo but even she would not be so stupid as to post a sealed custody report.

What is so absolutely disgraceful about this entire episode is the Defence has been trying to bring that report front and centre since the beginning of this sorry trial.

I fully blame Judge R for not banning mention of this report as it wasn't enough to simply say it couldn't be placed into evidence.

Shameful display and I hope there are consequences if this did play out as described by Atty manning.
MOO

Exactly. I am fuming.

 

[Megnut]

MOO

I call BOLOGNA SANDWICH on defense's representation that they thought their screens weren't visible. They taken great pains to have the home screen a delightful family-style photo. They don't do anything by accident.

 

[shotgun09]

Uh, yeah, that's a huge font.

Yep. And meant to be displayed and disseminated, IMO

 

[Jmoose]

Wow, not quite sure of all specifics yet on what was displayed, apparently on defendant MT’s computer? But wonder if it is near time for the court / judge to assess and take measures to remind of decorum and operations within a criminal proceeding, and any possible orders governing it and such conduct. And to sanction or remedy any possible offense. One would think with those spectacles that defendant is wearing, font would not need to be set that large on a screen monitor.

And if MT family / relatives or friends attempting to communicate with the juror(s)? Wow!
MOO

They’re gunning for a mistrial-and if they get one, I hope she gets a contempt rap.

 

[Megnut]

MOO

Notice the attorney is right there facing the screen.

 

[Megnut]

MOO

This is stunning. New low for Defense Counsel .

 

[afitzy]

<modsnip - quoted post containing possible photo of a sealed document on a laptop have been removed>

Frankly in addition to MT being punished I think sanctions and damages are in order for BOTH DEFENCE COUNSEL HERE.

This is just a cheap stunt imo to backdoor what they have wanted since this entire sham of a trial started and I simply hope there are consequences.

WHY DOES MT HAVE THAT REPORT ON HER LAPTOP?

Atty Felson is looking right at the MT LAPTOP. WHY?

Why was MT computer NOT IMMEDIATELY SEIZED BY THE BAILIFF! WHY DIDN"T JUDGE R order the seizure?

WHY are there never consequences for either FD or MT breaking the laws?

MOO

 

[Eli9]

I agree with you all, the Defense playing dumb on this is unbelievable.

 

[afitzy]

They’re gunning for a mistrial-and if they get one, I hope she gets a contempt rap.

My guess is that it was in direct retaliation for the phone data being allowed.

MT believes rules are for other people and I very much pray Judge R holds her accountable.
MOO

 

[Gardenista]

Probably too late for that.

Hopefully they took it as she was leaving the courtroom.

 

[sweetcaro]

How stupid can you be? I hope she gets a huge slapdown from the judge with severe consequences. And her family barred from the courtroom! And bs on not realising their screens were on view.

 

[Gardenista]

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 51-33a​

(a) Any person who violates the dignity and authority of any court, in its presence or so near thereto as to obstruct the administration of justice, or any officer of any court who misbehaves in the conduct of his official duties shall be guilty of contempt and shall be fined not more than five hundred dollars or imprisoned not more than six months or both.

(b) No person charged with violating this section may be tried for the violation before the same judge against whom the alleged contempt was perpetrated.

Section 51-33a - Criminal contempt, Conn. Gen. Stat. § 51-33a | Casetext Search + Citator

Read Section 51-33a - Criminal contempt, Conn. Gen. Stat. § 51-33a, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext’s comprehensive legal database

casetext.com

 

[VacationMode]

MOO

Notice the attorney is right there facing the screen.

And it's slightly turned towards the camera. Shameful.

 

[carolmaria]

MOO

MT should be jailed immediately. Shackled in the courtroom, no access to devices. And Counsel should be disbarred.

Yep I’ve long thought Audrey Felsen would rue the day she took on this case. Thought better of her.

EWWWWWWW

All of this tracks with the longtime Troconis Insta Twit/X propaganda and courthouse step stuff. Not to mention harassing reporters on Twit. They’ve been steadily emboldened and now this, IMO.

Acting like the mob in the courtroom, MOO

ETA: If any trial needed a gag order, it was this one.

 

[afitzy]

What did MT screen in the big font say exactly?

She was allegedly reading the banned/discredited/useless Family Court report that is disallowed from evidence and which Defence has been trying every chance they can to get it in.

I do wonder if this was very specifically planned by Defence Counsel himself and Mama Troconis and MT?
MOO

 

[citygirl]

Why call a mistrial?
The judge should just say she's guilty and be done with it.
MOO.

 

[afitzy]

Yep I’ve long thought Audrey Felsen would rue the day she took on this case. Thought better of her.

EWWWWWWW

All of this tracks with the longtime Troconis Insta Twit/X propaganda and courthouse step stuff. They’ve been steadily emboldened and now this, IMO.

Acting like the mob in the courtroom, MOO

Hate to say it but this is just the kind stuff you see in third/fourth world courtrooms.

Its all based on bully type tactics and in places where might makes right and there is no rule of law. NONE.

I've never had faith in the CT Courts but if this is allowed to happen here by Judge R with no consequences then we all minds well simply pack up and go to Venezuela or some such legal hellhole.

MOO

 

[Megnut]

MOO

I replayed the video and it's plain as day, fully visible, for a protracted amount of time.

As if to give someone in the gallery time enough to read it, in font big enough to be read.

I'm sorry. No sympathy for the defendant but this is attorney misconduct in the Judge's own courtroom.

Serious contempt by counsel if you ask me.