CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, deceased/not found, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #63

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #101
Atty Meehan represented the five Dulos children. Certain elements are precluded. In order to protect the rights of the children.
He wants a 3rd party witness protective order to protect his testimony of the minor children.
 
  • #102
Looks like hardball from the State to put a pin into the "FD is winning" argument might be in play.....

Curious how they are bringing Atty Meehan given what was found regarding his behaviour by Family Court.....

MOO
Replying to myself.

Think we are seeing a brilliant "panther like" move by the State.

The MT public statements and the Troconis crew are being specifically referenced!

MO)
 
  • #103
Already I didn't have "pelvic thrust" on my card.

Buckle up, Everybody. It's going to be a noisy morning!
Yeah. Coming from the interpreter.
 
  • #104
Looks like hardball from the State to put a pin into the "FD is winning" argument might be in play.....

Curious how they are bringing Atty Meehan given what was found regarding his behaviour by Family Court.....

MOO
Bingo!
 
  • #105
Translator is screaming!
Yikes.
 
  • #106
State proffers -- State does not plan to ask the 3rd party witness (Meehan) about the children's health or well-being.

State wishes to elicit testimony from the guardian ad litem the history of visitation restrictions imposed on both FD and the defendant.

State also wants to have witness testify to a phone call between him and FD and the defendant, goes to their states of mind.

State doesn't intend to query on the contents of the custody report, but she does want to introduce testimony to show that things were not going well for FD.
 
  • #107
Judge is asking the State how they can query the third party witness without encroaching into the custody report.

State says she doesn't need to go into the content of the report. She wants to elicit the history of contention, FD's state of mind over 18 months.
 
  • #108
Atty Manning is stalking and pouncing like a panther on argument of Defence overstepping on the issue of "State of Mind of FD and MT".

IMO this issue was created by Defence hyperbole on the entire issue of 'winning' and if they had just left this issue by the side this direction might not be needed. But, Defence opened this door and now State's offer will put a total 'pin' in the status of state of mind of MT and FD.

So agree as its what we have been chatting about here for 4 years here.

MOO
 
  • #109
Judge hit on my exact concerns about this. Cross.
 
  • #110
Atty Manning is stalking and pouncing like a panther on argument of Defence overstepping on the issue of "State of Mind of FD and MT".

So agree as its what we have been chatting about here for 4 years here.

MOO
I don’t think the Judge is buying
 
  • #111
Defence Counsel brings it all back to the discredited Dr Herman report as expected imo.

So despicable imo.

MOO
 
  • #112
Specifically Atty Manning wants Mehan to testify to FD's state of mind going into the custody report hearing and then his state of mind leaving that hearing. State alludes a marked difference in his state of mind IMO
 
  • #113
Judge does not want to use a cliche -- doesn't want to walk a razor's edge.

He is worried about anything that exposes the custody report.

Summarizes the State's position: questioning the third party witness for his observations of FD and the defendant's frames of mine
 
  • #114
Whoa

Is JS testifying to what's IN THE REPORT??
 
  • #115
The 'reaction' of the children that Defence Counsel is talking about is severe psychological damage per the Family Court. To see this damage diminished by Defence Counsel is OFFENSIVE and FACTUALLY INCORRECT.

What nonsense from Defence Counsel and lots of spaghetti flying around here imo.

MOO
 
  • #116
Whoa

Is JS testifying to what's IN THE REPORT??
YES. But not telling the story correctly. This is absolutely shameful.
MOO
 
  • #117
Defense accuses the state of cherry picking.
 
  • #118
Lots of "THRUSTING" by Defence Counsel at Judge R....
 
  • #119
JS says FD was delighted with the report.

JS says there was movement toward intergating the defendant and her daughter into the visitation agreement.

JS says he has no intention of asking anything about the children, their health, anything they said.
 
  • #120
He is now claiming the Unfinished Report from DR Hermann had to do with lack of payment imo is factually incorrect. Judge Heller tossed the report as it was unfinished and DR Hermann would not testify iirc.
MOO
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
128
Guests online
2,416
Total visitors
2,544

Forum statistics

Threads
632,615
Messages
18,629,113
Members
243,216
Latest member
zagadka
Back
Top