CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, deceased/not found, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #63

[Megnut]

I sure hope they weren’t burning her. The smell of human tissue or bone burning is a scent like no other. Neighbors would have noticed that odor if they were outside.

Grisly... flesh and bone, yes. But disarticulated innards? Macabre I know but how would that be different than grilling? I'm sorry, such an awful topic and suggestion. But we'd be talking about a very small package, relatively.

Bones dealt with separately...

JMO

 

[nodamselindistress]

I just don't get the idea that Fotis works that hard at anything except playing. I recall hearing he had a background from childhood in skinning (what animals? I can't recall that part), but I just can't see him doing that after his early morning ride and murder in New Canaan. He is the kind of guy who tells others what to do and does very little himself.

 

[Megnut]

I just don't get the idea that Fotis works that hard at anything except playing. I recall hearing he had a background from childhood in skinning (what animals? I can't recall that part), but I just can't see him doing that after his early morning ride and murder in New Canaan. He is the kind of guy who tells others what to do and does very little himself.

However, he was seriously motivated... deadly serious...

 

[oc1234]

2:59, just before the lunch recess, Atty Felson leans over in front of the defendant and whispers, "just leave it. I'm going to turn off the screen".

Thoughts?

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Good Catch! Seems like this further supports that MT was utilizing the counsel's laptop.

 

[Ruminations]

Weeks from now.....nothing else being done now other than removing PC from Defendant.

But, if her attorneys are letting her use their laptops then what was the purpose of what Judge R did today?

I'm confused as it seems there are no consequences for the Defendant.
MOO

Fine with me- I'd rather finish the murder trial before the hearing for contempt of court.

What else? Night court for a contempt hearing?

I'm not clear on how it could be sooner than after this trial.

MOO

 

[Megnut]

MOO

5:10 the laptop is again in front of the defendant. Screen black. As JS walks past her, she actually lifts up the laptop and moves it.

Is this some kind of game?

Judge said only Counsel was to have laptops. But since he didn't say anything about laptops that might be off, it's okay? It's not like Atty Felsen is unaware.

This is very intentional.

What's the end game?

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[oc1234]

MOO

5:10 the laptop is again in front of the defendant. Screen black. As JS walks past her, she actually lifts up the laptop and moves it.

Is this some kind of game?

Judge said only Counsel was to have laptops. But since he didn't say anything about laptops that might be off, it's okay? It's not like Atty Felsen is unaware.

This is very intentional.

What's the end game?

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

WOW, this needs to be shown to the prosecution. She is controlling a laptop on the very day the Judge took them away from all but counselors. Beyond brazen behavior. Maybe she thought that when he was moving towards her it would also be blocking the camera view so she could move it without detection? This is shocking to see.

 

[Megnut]

MOO

Back to 80 MS...

Does anybody else recall LE interest in a basement -- was it at 80 MS? Looking for anomalies in the concrete? As I recall it, nothing found....

Hear me out.

If FD was doing the unthinkable and separating a body for disposal, what would be the overall mass of bone for a petite female? Not a lot. If LE was using ground generating radar and the like, they were likely looking for a body. Not a parcel.

I know it's ghastly but he is ghastly. What we already know he did is ghastly. Clothes cut off, tip ties cut off. Evidence burned at 4 JC. Evidence discarded in Hartford. What else did he divide and conceal?

And when and where did the ponchos get used? At 80 MS? Prior to 80 MS? Somewhere adjacent to MS?

When did the defendant wear hers? The lunch hour that never happened?

There's no way she wasn't in deep.

Jmo

 

[Genieeasy]

Exhausting but insightful day! Still trial seems a mess and not near a resting spot…what does everyone else think?
MT is basically coming off psychotic and hysterical. Det. Kimball’s focus and stealthy stares nail it. JS can bring in testimony from his “lying expert” but like was mentioned her involvement with other questionable trials …Epstein, Maxwell, Weinstein did not seem to produce much exoneration. I have so much respect for this jury who are being put through this very extended and tedious trial and since the early glitches are displaying very honorable and responsible service.
Glad we can all decompress on a long weekend and see what next week brings toward any reasonable trial closure date.
And again thanks to all the posters who keep up updated to the moment during the trial.

 

[BUF]

I think Detective Kimball understands what is going on with Defendant perfectly imo.

View attachment 483740

He sure does.

If anyone can bring this all together, this is the guy imo.

 

[Boxer]

From 3:30-7pm on May 24th, 2019 was "Middle School Fun Night" at EWS, then from 7pm-9pm was the Spring Musical for 9th/10th grades. If FD/MT picked up NBT at 9, then she stayed for the Upper School Spring Musical? And it would seem that musical was Chicago? MOO

wow.

 

[citygirl]

Any ideas on who the final witness may be?

 

[MX27875]

If someone asks me what new thing I learned today, I’ll say “eeeeeehhhhhhheeeeeeem”.

 

[Megnut]

5:38 nice screenshot of the defendant with a laptop that's not hers.

Feels like playing games.

JMO

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[MX27875]

Any ideas on who the final witness may be?

I would think either KM or Home Depot person if they have proof of her buying things in advance.

 

[kaen]

I was not surprised by the Contempt hearing being moved. Nor was I surprised that the judge took all gallery to task. If there are people making motions to witnesses or defendants it is not appropriate. Hearts and well wishes for anyone should not be tolerated. Supporters of MT should not and neither should supporters of the Farber/Dulos family. It is a little unbelievable that the defense had seen things and let it slide bc they should not have. I was glad that the judge told everyone to stop doing anything that could jeopardize the case. I care that JD is represented with respect AND I also care that the jury is able to move forward in a clean and fair way rather than be dismissed for some BS that occurs in the gallery.

The defense counsels tantrum on his expert witnesses was not unexpected. I think that the relationship between the defendant and her legal team is more than strained and is almost hostile at this point. Even JS's "sientete" to his client felt dismissive and hostile. At this point MT often leaves and doesn't say a word to either of them at the end of the court day. I am sure things got frostier when they found out the antics she was pulling. JS has been struggling to get any of his motions and challenges granted. I think he thought this would be easier and it has been harder--- he is, in effect, representing FD for free and dealing with videos that are damning and a client who clearly is hiding things, again and again.

The judge's ruling on the document made sense to me for two reasons. 1. If he precludes the defense from any option to present their defense the appeal will surely go in her favor. So he split the baby. 2. Giving the defense such a limited amount of time to create a document means that they will have to stay within what has been cobbled together which means that it will be easier for the prosecution to tear it apart. It is a bunch of work and I am sure not what they want to do with their long weekend but they got something.....a trimmed down scope. The defense is going to pay big bucks AND will not be able to cherry pick what they wanted to put in the document nearly to the degree they had hoped.

 

[Knitty]

New thread in 5 minutes.

 

[citygirl]

Exhausting but insightful day! Still trial seems a mess and not near a resting spot…what does everyone else think?
MT is basically coming off psychotic and hysterical. Det. Kimball’s focus and stealthy stares nail it. JS can bring in testimony from his “lying expert” but like was mentioned her involvement with other questionable trials …Epstein, Maxwell, Weinstein did not seem to produce much exoneration. I have so much respect for this jury who are being put through this very extended and tedious trial and since the early glitches are displaying very honorable and responsible service.
Glad we can all decompress on a long weekend and see what next week brings toward any reasonable trial closure date.
And again thanks to all the posters who keep up updated to the moment during the trial.

BBM.
Why do you think this?
I felt as though we have met a resting spot.
What am I missing?
MOO

 

[citygirl]

He sure does.

If anyone can bring this all together, this is the guy imo.

IMO, he is psyched. Today was his day. All of his efforts brought to the fore.

 

[I am not Sherlock H.]

I was not surprised by the Contempt hearing being moved. Nor was I surprised that the judge took all gallery to task. If there are people making motions to witnesses or defendants it is not appropriate. Hearts and well wishes for anyone should not be tolerated. Supporters of MT should not and neither should supporters of the Farber/Dulos family. It is a little unbelievable that the defense had seen things and let it slide bc they should not have. I was glad that the judge told everyone to stop doing anything that could jeopardize the case. I care that JD is represented with respect AND I also care that the jury is able to move forward in a clean and fair way rather than be dismissed for some BS that occurs in the gallery.

The defense counsels tantrum on his expert witnesses was not unexpected. I think that the relationship between the defendant and her legal team is more than strained and is almost hostile at this point. Even JS's "sientete" to his client felt dismissive and hostile. At this point MT often leaves and doesn't say a word to either of them at the end of the court day. I am sure things got frostier when they found out the antics she was pulling. JS has been struggling to get any of his motions and challenges granted. I think he thought this would be easier and it has been harder--- he is, in effect, representing FD for free and dealing with videos that are damning and a client who clearly is hiding things, again and again.

The judge's ruling on the document made sense to me for two reasons. 1. If he precludes the defense from any option to present their defense the appeal will surely go in her favor. So he split the baby. 2. Giving the defense such a limited amount of time to create a document means that they will have to stay within what has been cobbled together which means that it will be easier for the prosecution to tear it apart. It is a bunch of work and I am sure not what they want to do with their long weekend but they got something.....a trimmed down scope. The defense is going to pay big bucks AND will not be able to cherry pick what they wanted to put in the document nearly to the degree they had hoped.

Agree with all, and would add though, that as I recall from testimony in court last week (or week prior), the state brought up the issue of obtaining defense expert testimony CV, resume, and reports of their testimony. And that was in court in presence of the judge and counsel for the defendant. MOO