GUILTY CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, deceased/not found, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #71

[BJarv]

Just a quite footnote: I think MT burned documents and plans and the Herman report. She missed that last copy. It is my opinion that, after LE took it into evidence, FD, MT, and anyT's no longer had a physical copy of the report. They regurgitated it from memory often but did not have the text, until, after a lively tete a tete with Atty Felsen, suddenly the moment had arrived for the great reveal. MT, lighting it up on her tablet. She was probably giddy with anticipation. I do wonder if MT was in possession at that moment of the entire sealed report or just four pages of it. MT did not do this on her own. But then, she's intimately familiar with conspiracy to crime.

NO ONE should skate on this breach.

JMO

Good questions. We don't know which of the 4 pages Atty Felson allegedly had or even if Atty Felson told the truth about only having 4 pages. The attorneys I asked about the Felson statement said it made zero sense as her only role in the trial was to handle cross examimation of the other corrupt attorneys (GAL Meehan and Rose) about the report and related matters and how could she do this effectively with only 4 pages.

Its so easy to digitise documents using a phone these days and we know MT lived on her phone. I think the report lived on in digital form either as screen shots or in pdf form and that is what was seen on MT computer at the trial.

It does make me angry though that its unclear whether the State of CT demanded Horn and Mini Horn to return any all copies of the report to the State and certify that no digital copies existed on their computers or servers.

MOO

 

[pernickety]

^^rsbm

I don't see the comparison between the cited civil action and the subject criminal case. This is emphasized here in that MT was charged with contempt separately under a new criminal charge. JMO

I was thinking of Horn trying to slip the report into the evidence stack. AIR, after Manning caught him in the act, he said something to the judge about having the clerk mark it as an exhibit? In the Kortner case the clerk Did get the improper doc before the jury and then allegedly didn't tell the judge about the jurors' question about it--resulting in a mistrial. In the appeal to the SC in that case, the CT Bar Association filed an amicus brief. Without seeing it, I can only speculate what attorney misconduct it could've been about. Was it the clerk's? Was that clerk investigated by the Bar?

 

[pernickety]

Interesting. Perhaps as you say this all was in the back of the pea brain of Schoenhorn as a kind of 'hail mary pass' or get out of jail card for convicted felon MT? Your information might explain why a useless report was given so much attention by Schoenhorn and MT was willing to commit the act of contempt?

And Horn had gone out to lunch that day with Mami and Papi and had to do something to make them keep loving him.

 

[Jmoose]

Actually I hope she has found peace and is not wasting her time or energy reliving this tragedy through MT and her pathetic attempts to absolve herself from Jennifer’s murder.

Me, too. Seeking retribution does nothing to help those children.

 

[Deleted member 229974]

Me, too. Seeking retribution does nothing to help those children.

And I think Jennifer would agree too.

 

[Seattle1]

I was thinking of Horn trying to slip the report into the evidence stack. AIR, after Manning caught him in the act, he said something to the judge about having the clerk mark it as an exhibit? In the Kortner case the clerk Did get the improper doc before the jury and then allegedly didn't tell the judge about the jurors' question about it--resulting in a mistrial. In the appeal to the SC in that case, the CT Bar Association filed an amicus brief. Without seeing it, I can only speculate what attorney misconduct it could've been about. Was it the clerk's? Was that clerk investigated by the Bar?

When Rose testified?

Even if Horn slipped in the report following Rose's testimony, I don't see how it would have affected the verdict. Noting remarkable about Rose where I doubt jurors would have looked at it. I don't have any doubt that MT still would have been convicted. In the referenced case, a civil action, this was a money grab-- the only punishment is with the checkbook. That case wasn't about a conviction or sentence, it was about the total award at final judgement, where the burden is very low.

Rose recounted how he and Fotis Dulos had reviewed a custody report at the offices of attorney Michael Meehan in April 2019, and how his client reacted to the report. “He was very happy with what was there, pleased. He just seemed relieved and more optimistic than I’d seen him in a while,” Rose said.

Given the chance, the defense would have loved to paint a picture that JFd disappeared herself because Fd was going to receive custody of the children, and therefore he had no reason to murder JFd, and she left on her own, as she had before. This ^^ based on one (Herman) paid expert's opinion. But it doesn't work that way. What's missing is JFd vanished before she could challenge Herman with her own expert. Noting that Herman couldn't even stand up to being questioned by an attorney -- let alone if challenged by a peer with similar credentials! His own behavior in Court caused the mistrial and his report to be sealed.

As for the State's overwhelming evidence at MT's trial, I believe Gloria Farber ultimately countered and buried Rose's testimony that Fd really wouldn't be celebrating custody (unless JFd was deceased), given Fd went from not seeing his children in March 2019 to only being allowed supervised visitation, a month before JFd was murdered, and how JFd never missed a birthday or event in the lives of her children from the day they were born.

Nope. This was hardly the picture of a man about to be awarded full custody of his children in a divorce! More like a morally and financially bankrupt man guilty of killing the mother of his children, and dependent on his children for financial support. MOO

https://www.stamfordadvocate.com/news/article/troconis-trial-jennifer-dulos-week-7-testify-18684195.php

 

[Deleted member 229974]

When Rose testified?

Even if Horn slipped in the report following Rose's testimony, I don't see how it would have affected the verdict. Noting remarkable about Rose where I doubt jurors would have looked at it. I don't have any doubt that MT still would have been convicted. In the referenced case, a civil action, this was a money grab-- the only punishment is with the checkbook. That case wasn't about a conviction or sentence, it was about the total award at final judgement, where the burden is very low.

Rose recounted how he and Fotis Dulos had reviewed a custody report at the offices of attorney Michael Meehan in April 2019, and how his client reacted to the report. “He was very happy with what was there, pleased. He just seemed relieved and more optimistic than I’d seen him in a while,” Rose said.

Given the chance, the defense would have loved to paint a picture that JFd disappeared herself because Fd was going to receive custody of the children, and therefore he had no reason to murder JFd, and she left on her own, as she had before. This ^^ based on one (Herman) paid expert's opinion. But it doesn't work that way. What's missing is JFd vanished before she could challenge Herman with her own expert. Noting that Herman couldn't even stand up to being questioned by an attorney -- let alone if challenged by a peer with similar credentials! His own behavior in Court caused the mistrial and his report to be sealed.

As for the State's overwhelming evidence at MT's trial, I believe Gloria Farber ultimately countered and buried Rose's testimony that Fd really wouldn't be celebrating custody (unless JFd was deceased), given Fd went from not seeing his children in March 2019 to only being allowed supervised visitation, a month before JFd was murdered, and how JFd never missed a birthday or event in the lives of her children from the day they were born.

Nope. This was hardly the picture of a man about to be awarded full custody of his children in a divorce! More like a morally and financially bankrupt man guilty of killing the mother of his children, and dependent on his children for financial support. MOO

https://www.stamfordadvocate.com/news/article/troconis-trial-jennifer-dulos-week-7-testify-18684195.php

All so true. FD knew the only way to get money was to get rid of Jennifer. And evil MT was right there cheering him along. IMO

 

[Megnut]

All so true. FD knew the only way to get money was to get rid of Jennifer. And evil MT was right there cheering him along. IMO

Exactly.

Hence, the murder's eve dinner party. FD decided to be the ultimate divorce court, Judge-and-jury FD declared who lived and who died, in order to "divorce" on his own terms. And by 'his own terms', I mean 'hi$ own term$'. And he conspired with MT and KM to pull it off.

JMO

 

[Seattle1]

Exactly.

Hence, the murder's eve dinner party. FD decided to be the ultimate divorce court, Judge-and-jury FD declared who lived and who died, in order to "divorce" on his own terms. And by 'his own terms', I mean 'hi$ own term$'. And he conspired with MT and KM to pull it off.

JMO

And yet within hours of ending the life of Jennifer, Fotis suddenly wanted Lauren in NY with the children to have them packed and ready for him, never mind the Court had only recently began allowing him supervised visits with the children, he just arrogantly assumed that by some miraculous default, he had the all powers of fatherhood restored to him, without any limitation or restriction, simply because he removed Jennifer from their lives, and from his divorce equation!

Guess what Fotis, think again!

MOO

 

[Megnut]

And yet within hours of ending the life of Jennifer, Fotis suddenly wanted Lauren in NY with the children to have them packed and ready for him, never mind the Court had only recently began allowing him supervised visits with the children, he just arrogantly assumed that by some miraculous default, he had the all powers of fatherhood restored to him, without any limitation or restriction, simply because he removed Jennifer from their lives, and from his divorce equation!

Guess what Fotis, think again!

MOO

And MT was fast getting hairs done, ready to assume JD 2.0 status.

I believe, even though they were grilling meats, they were both smelling a gravy train.
So preposterously self-serving.

With no concern for the damage done.

JMO

 

[Deleted member 229974]

There’s no doubt about that, the coward. IMO

 

[Jmoose]

And yet within hours of ending the life of Jennifer, Fotis suddenly wanted Lauren in NY with the children to have them packed and ready for him, never mind the Court had only recently began allowing him supervised visits with the children, he just arrogantly assumed that by some miraculous default, he had the all powers of fatherhood restored to him, without any limitation or restriction, simply because he removed Jennifer from their lives, and from his divorce equation!

Guess what Fotis, think again!

MOO

I guess that implies proof that he knew Jennifer was gone for good.

 

[sds71]

After waiting five years for justice, the children addressed Troconis with scathing statements in court at her sentencing in May, with Theodore, now 18, branding her 'evil, violent, and most definitely a coward'

Michelle Troconis makes bid for freedom with bombshell legal filing

Michelle Troconis, 49, has filed a petition requesting a review of her conviction in a move that could bring the grisly case back to the courtroom.

www.dailymail.co.uk

 

[BJarv]

After waiting five years for justice, the children addressed Troconis with scathing statements in court at her sentencing in May, with Theodore, now 18, branding her 'evil, violent, and most definitely a coward'

Michelle Troconis makes bid for freedom with bombshell legal filing

Michelle Troconis, 49, has filed a petition requesting a review of her conviction in a move that could bring the grisly case back to the courtroom.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Thanks for posting this vile article by the DM. I just had read it and honestly wasn't sure what to make of it as it seemed like Horn misinformation. I usually see solid crime and trial reporting from the DM but this article sadly smacks of being written by Horn and MT imo. Can't you just picture lazy ass attorney Schoenhorn saying, "I have some talking points all written up so just let me email them to you so we don't have to spend so much time on the phone chatting as I sadly no longer have a client in this matter that can pay me and I'm forced to go back to defending dog bite cases of cartel members...". Will have to follow up on this article as its simply not been fact checked at all imo.

Does anyone understand HOW Horn can continue to make public references and characterizations about the discredited report with no consequences? He and MT/familia continue to do this and nobody seems to be following the rules established long ago by Judge Blawie. Even Judge Randolph didn't fully follow the guidelines of Judge Blawie imo and now to see Horn simply 'horning on' about what the report maybe/mighta/coulda done for his convicted felon client YET again is simply the bridge too far imo.

The amicus filing by MT also continues to baffle my feeble brain with its flimsy narrative as I'm trying to understand HOW anyone can logically conclude NOW that she was leaving FD when it was clear the money was gone and the couple were no doubt surviving on her child support for Nicole and the Family Court matter was back to square 1? Was it as simple that she KNEW that JFD would no longer be an 'issue' and that the Farber would soon be rolling? Actually to me, if this were the fact pattern (and I think it might have been), then this shows clear direct knowledge of not only FD finances but the murder 'solution' to the couples 'financial woes'! Yep, she was planning on being a 'mother of 6' and enjoying all the child support money that would bring her for a period of time. No working any more for MT. Nope. No more smelly and heavy animal hide rugs to haul around and she would shortly be back on the year round skiing schedule with a summer trip to Greece!

MT knew that the credit cards were maxed out (FD credit report was posted many threads ago and showed that the couple were juggling credit cards) and the basic utilities had also been stacking up for months per the reports seen in the Probate Court iirc. I also guess they were using fires to simply keep the massive stone filled house warm and livable too (propane tank cost $6,000 then to fill up and FD didn't have the cash)! The world also saw MT and her MANY black HEFTY BAGS scrambling to pack up and leave 4JX after the police kicked the couple out for the search. MT showed no evidence that I can recall seeing that she was packed and ready to go or had any plan to abandon FD.

Horn could have (but didn't) present this narrative at trial and shown a text/email trail of convos between the couple (OOPs, this wasnt possible as he got the cell phone of MT tossed - curious that he fought to the mat to do this too - no mystery to me why but its quite ballsy imo to in the amicus filing to make the unsubstantiated claims that she does!). The other day I tried to recall if Horn and Mini Horn presented even ONE piece of exculpatory evidence in support of MT at trial I could not come up with anything! I think if we played a "Price is Right style game" with the trial category of "Exculpatory Evidence at Trial" that each card listed would be blank as there would be nothing to fill up questions for the category?! I do think Horn and MT and Mama Troconis thought the jurors would be idiots and not see the sand based foundation of their sorry case. Unreal that MT and her new attorney now seem to be implying that exculpatory evidence might exist? IDK, too little too late and there is zero that I can recall in the trial transcript to support any of the latest claims in the habeas filing by MT.

I do wonder how many MT stories will be told? I think we now have at least 4 narratives about a whole slew of issues between FD and MT including their relationship, thoughts on the future and future plans, money or lack thereof and on and on. It just seems like a 'spin the wheel' and pick a story process of self defense and I for one am beyond furious that yet another [link removed] CT attorney allowed that amicus document to be filed with the Court, complete with imo unsubstantiated lies for which no trial evidence exists to support any of it.

My strong suspicion is that yet again MT is lying about the relationship and this latest version of her 'story' is a pure WHOPPER!

I do wonder if delusion can be a genetic disorder as MT seemed delusional about her relationship with FD (he obviously didn't give a rats ass about her as he knew he needed alot of money and so simply found a person that had some and was stupid enough to trust him) and her family continues to demonstrate advanced level delusion via their claims that she is 'innocent'! I do love to hear the amusing protestations of MT innocence from the Troconis clan as its never quite clear exactly what they think she is innocent of...... FWIW I don't think MT has an 'innocent' bone in her entire body and imo also this goes back to the time her parents sent her half way around the world to the therapy horse farm in NY as a no doubt troubled teen.

MOO

 

[I am not Sherlock H.]

Thanks for posting this vile article by the DM. I usually see solid crime and trial reporting from the DM but this article sadly smacks of being written by Horn and MT imo. Can't you just picture Horn saying, "I have some talking points all written up so just let me email them to you so we don't have to spend so much time on the phone chatting...". Will have to follow up on this article as its simply not been fact checked at all imo.

Does anyone understand HOW Horn can continue to make public references and characterisations about the discredited report with no consequences? He and MT/familia continue to do this and nobody seems to be following the rules established long ago by Judge Blawie. Even Judge Randolph didn't fully follow the guidelines of Judge Blawie imo and now to see Horn simply 'horning on' about what the report maybe/mighta/coulda done for his convicted felon client YET again is simply the bridge too far imo.

The amicus filing by MT also continues to baffle my feeble brain with its flimsy narrative as I'm trying to understand HOW anyone can logically conclude NOW that she was leaving FD when it was clear the money was gone and the couple were no doubt surviving on her child support for Nicole and the Family Court matter was back to square 1? Was it as simple that she KNEW that JFD would no longer be an 'issue' and that the Farber would soon be rolling? Actually to me, if this were the fact pattern (and I think it might have been), then this shows clear direct knowledge of not only FD finances but the murder 'solution' to the couples 'financial woes'! Yep, she was planning on being a 'mother of 6' and enjoying all the child support money that would bring her for a period of time. No working any more for MT. Nope. No more smelly and heavy animal hide rugs to haul around and she would shortly be back on the year round skiing schedule with a summer trip to Greece!

MT knew that the credit cards were maxed out (FD credit report was posted many threads ago and showed that the couple were juggling credit cards) and the basic utilities had also been stacking up for months per the reports seen in the Probate Court iirc. I also guess they were using fires to simply keep the massive stone filled house warm and livable too (propane tank cost $6,000 then to fill up and FD didn't have the cash)! The world also saw MT and her MANY black HEFTY BAGS scrambling to pack up and leave 4JX after the police kicked the couple out for the search. MT showed no evidence that I can recall seeing that she was packed and ready to go or had any plan to abandon FD. Horn could have (but didn't) present this narrative at trial and shown a text/email trail of convos between the couple (OOPs, this wasnt possible as he got the cell phone of MT tossed - curious that he fought to the mat to do this too!).

I do wonder how many MT stories will be told? I think we now have at least 4 narratives about a whole slew of issues between FD and MT including their relationship, thoughts on the future and future plans, money or lack thereof and on and on. It just seems like a 'spin the wheel' and pick a story process of self defense and I for one am beyond furious that yet another CT attorney allowed that amicus document to be filed with the Court, complete with imo unsubstantiated lies for which no trial evidence exists to support any of it.

My strong suspicion is that yet again MT is lying about the relationship and this latest version of her 'story' is a pure WHOPPER!

I do wonder if delusion can be a genetic disorder as MT seemed delusional about her relationship with FD (he obviously didn't give a rats *advertiser censored* about her as he knew he needed alot of money and so simply found a person that had some and was stupid enough to trust him) and her family continues to demonstrate advanced level delusion via their claims that she is 'innocent'! I do love to hear the amusing protestations of MT innocence from the Troconis clan as its never quite clear exactly what they think she is innocent of...... FWIW I don't think MT has an 'innocent' bone in her entire body and imo also this goes back to the time her parents sent her half way around the world to the therapy horse farm in NY as a no doubt troubled teen.

MOO

Thanks @BJarv ….. great summary!

And that possible synopsis described, maybe created by JS and the convicted felon defendant. Wondering too about AF? And of course blame and aspersions are cast everywhere but…….. Seems the convicted defendant and her counsel don’t have mirrors for self reflection.

That seems to remind me of a certain defense expert that had taken an Uber ride IIRC from a location? And dictated a report for the defense counsel? One that IIARC the defense expert might not have even seen it it’s final form.

It won’t be any too soon IMO when the whole defense group can be overlooked. And emphasis instead on the still missing JF, her children, and family.

And I am glad that article used the word ‘bombshell’; that told me plenty and that one probably should scroll past it perhaps. MOO

 

[Megnut]

Thanks for posting this vile article by the DM. I just had read it and honestly wasn't sure what to make of it as it seemed like Horn misinformation. I usually see solid crime and trial reporting from the DM but this article sadly smacks of being written by Horn and MT imo. Can't you just picture Horn saying, "I have some talking points all written up so just let me email them to you so we don't have to spend so much time on the phone chatting...". Will have to follow up on this article as its simply not been fact checked at all imo.

Does anyone understand HOW Horn can continue to make public references and characterizations about the discredited report with no consequences? He and MT/familia continue to do this and nobody seems to be following the rules established long ago by Judge Blawie. Even Judge Randolph didn't fully follow the guidelines of Judge Blawie imo and now to see Horn simply 'horning on' about what the report maybe/mighta/coulda done for his convicted felon client YET again is simply the bridge too far imo.

The amicus filing by MT also continues to baffle my feeble brain with its flimsy narrative as I'm trying to understand HOW anyone can logically conclude NOW that she was leaving FD when it was clear the money was gone and the couple were no doubt surviving on her child support for Nicole and the Family Court matter was back to square 1? Was it as simple that she KNEW that JFD would no longer be an 'issue' and that the Farber would soon be rolling? Actually to me, if this were the fact pattern (and I think it might have been), then this shows clear direct knowledge of not only FD finances but the murder 'solution' to the couples 'financial woes'! Yep, she was planning on being a 'mother of 6' and enjoying all the child support money that would bring her for a period of time. No working any more for MT. Nope. No more smelly and heavy animal hide rugs to haul around and she would shortly be back on the year round skiing schedule with a summer trip to Greece!

MT knew that the credit cards were maxed out (FD credit report was posted many threads ago and showed that the couple were juggling credit cards) and the basic utilities had also been stacking up for months per the reports seen in the Probate Court iirc. I also guess they were using fires to simply keep the massive stone filled house warm and livable too (propane tank cost $6,000 then to fill up and FD didn't have the cash)! The world also saw MT and her MANY black HEFTY BAGS scrambling to pack up and leave 4JX after the police kicked the couple out for the search. MT showed no evidence that I can recall seeing that she was packed and ready to go or had any plan to abandon FD. Horn could have (but didn't) present this narrative at trial and shown a text/email trail of convos between the couple (OOPs, this wasnt possible as he got the cell phone of MT tossed - curious that he fought to the mat to do this too!).

I do wonder how many MT stories will be told? I think we now have at least 4 narratives about a whole slew of issues between FD and MT including their relationship, thoughts on the future and future plans, money or lack thereof and on and on. It just seems like a 'spin the wheel' and pick a story process of self defense and I for one am beyond furious that yet another CT attorney allowed that amicus document to be filed with the Court, complete with imo unsubstantiated lies for which no trial evidence exists to support any of it.

My strong suspicion is that yet again MT is lying about the relationship and this latest version of her 'story' is a pure WHOPPER!

I do wonder if delusion can be a genetic disorder as MT seemed delusional about her relationship with FD (he obviously didn't give a rats *advertiser censored* about her as he knew he needed alot of money and so simply found a person that had some and was stupid enough to trust him) and her family continues to demonstrate advanced level delusion via their claims that she is 'innocent'! I do love to hear the amusing protestations of MT innocence from the Troconis clan as its never quite clear exactly what they think she is innocent of...... FWIW I don't think MT has an 'innocent' bone in her entire body and imo also this goes back to the time her parents sent her half way around the world to the therapy horse farm in NY as a no doubt troubled teen.

MOO

FD and MT found a workaround to court, divorce, child support, bankruptcy.

"Mother of 6" IMO was code for lottery. FD and MT believed that the jackpot was near.

Unbelievably crass.

Child support and trusts, full access to Farber family money to save his failing business -- except he'd likely retire to year round waterskiing somewhere, with a nanny on retainer (more Farber money). No one would suspect him/them and he'd just keep charming his way through their money.

He underestimated JFd's strength in fighting back

He underestimated GF.

And we now know everything we need to know about FD and MT.

Except

WHERE'S JENNIFER?

JMO

 

[BJarv]

Yep, 'bombshell' was the tip off that the article was drafted by Horn & MT imo. What a farce.

Since Horn says MT is getting lots of letters in prison, I'm tempted to brave my post COVID brain fog feebleness and draft a simple letter.

Dear Duchess of York,

I am so happy to see that you are where you belong in York Prison following the brilliant work done by a very savvy and astute jury of your peers (I'm saying this about comparing you to the jury to be kind as this is sadly how I'm wired but I don't truly believe this at all as we all know you to be evil and self interest incarnate and the jury members were in no way your peers in any way that matter imo).

I looked at the commissary list with the idea of trying to find something that I know you would enjoy and which fit my budget of USD.01 but sadly I could not find anything that met my criteria. I will however keep looking and maybe in the future something tasty might be coming your way, or not. You and your lovely hermanas and all your beautiful crucifix jewelry worn over the years inspired me with a gift though. I do have a wonderful spanish/english bible that I will pop in the mail to you today that might perhaps make for some enlightening reading during the cold winter months ahead. Go with GOD chica!

So glad to hear that you are doing volunteer work to 'help people'! But, I would encourage you to do instead what you do best and help yourself to the wide range of mental health services you have access to courtesy of the poor CT Taxpayers. I looked at the options for classes and you can perhaps take some english classes to improve your proficiency and maybe learn a profession to get you through retirement as no doubt your days of making 'a man' your career plan are in your rear view mirror at this point.

I have many thoughts on your latest habeas filing with the court but will save those for a future letter I think. But, I am curious if your attorney made you aware of the consequences of not telling the truth aka lying in a filing made to the Court which you signed?

Adios!
XOXO (not!)

 

[Cloudydiamond]

Socialite lol

 

[Deleted member 229974]

Thanks for posting this vile article by the DM. I just had read it and honestly wasn't sure what to make of it as it seemed like Horn misinformation. I usually see solid crime and trial reporting from the DM but this article sadly smacks of being written by Horn and MT imo. Can't you just picture lazy *advertiser censored* attorney Schoenhorn saying, "I have some talking points all written up so just let me email them to you so we don't have to spend so much time on the phone chatting as I sadly no longer have a client in this matter that can pay me and I'm forced to go back to defending dog bite cases of cartel members...". Will have to follow up on this article as its simply not been fact checked at all imo.

Does anyone understand HOW Horn can continue to make public references and characterizations about the discredited report with no consequences? He and MT/familia continue to do this and nobody seems to be following the rules established long ago by Judge Blawie. Even Judge Randolph didn't fully follow the guidelines of Judge Blawie imo and now to see Horn simply 'horning on' about what the report maybe/mighta/coulda done for his convicted felon client YET again is simply the bridge too far imo.

The amicus filing by MT also continues to baffle my feeble brain with its flimsy narrative as I'm trying to understand HOW anyone can logically conclude NOW that she was leaving FD when it was clear the money was gone and the couple were no doubt surviving on her child support for Nicole and the Family Court matter was back to square 1? Was it as simple that she KNEW that JFD would no longer be an 'issue' and that the Farber would soon be rolling? Actually to me, if this were the fact pattern (and I think it might have been), then this shows clear direct knowledge of not only FD finances but the murder 'solution' to the couples 'financial woes'! Yep, she was planning on being a 'mother of 6' and enjoying all the child support money that would bring her for a period of time. No working any more for MT. Nope. No more smelly and heavy animal hide rugs to haul around and she would shortly be back on the year round skiing schedule with a summer trip to Greece!

MT knew that the credit cards were maxed out (FD credit report was posted many threads ago and showed that the couple were juggling credit cards) and the basic utilities had also been stacking up for months per the reports seen in the Probate Court iirc. I also guess they were using fires to simply keep the massive stone filled house warm and livable too (propane tank cost $6,000 then to fill up and FD didn't have the cash)! The world also saw MT and her MANY black HEFTY BAGS scrambling to pack up and leave 4JX after the police kicked the couple out for the search. MT showed no evidence that I can recall seeing that she was packed and ready to go or had any plan to abandon FD.

Horn could have (but didn't) present this narrative at trial and shown a text/email trail of convos between the couple (OOPs, this wasnt possible as he got the cell phone of MT tossed - curious that he fought to the mat to do this too - no mystery to me why but its quite ballsy imo to in the amicus filing to make the unsubstantiated claims that she does!). The other day I tried to recall if Horn and Mini Horn presented even ONE piece of exculpatory evidence in support of MT at trial I could not come up with anything! I think if we played a "Price is Right style game" with the trial category of "Exculpatory Evidence at Trial" that each card listed would be blank as there would be nothing to fill up questions for the category?! I do think Horn and MT and Mama Troconis thought the jurors would be idiots and not see the sand based foundation of their sorry case. Unreal that MT and her new attorney now seem to be implying that exculpatory evidence might exist? IDK, too little too late and there is zero that I can recall in the trial transcript to support any of the latest claims in the habeas filing by MT.

I do wonder how many MT stories will be told? I think we now have at least 4 narratives about a whole slew of issues between FD and MT including their relationship, thoughts on the future and future plans, money or lack thereof and on and on. It just seems like a 'spin the wheel' and pick a story process of self defense and I for one am beyond furious that yet another CT attorney allowed that amicus document to be filed with the Court, complete with imo unsubstantiated lies for which no trial evidence exists to support any of it.

My strong suspicion is that yet again MT is lying about the relationship and this latest version of her 'story' is a pure WHOPPER!

I do wonder if delusion can be a genetic disorder as MT seemed delusional about her relationship with FD (he obviously didn't give a rats *advertiser censored* about her as he knew he needed alot of money and so simply found a person that had some and was stupid enough to trust him) and her family continues to demonstrate advanced level delusion via their claims that she is 'innocent'! I do love to hear the amusing protestations of MT innocence from the Troconis clan as its never quite clear exactly what they think she is innocent of...... FWIW I don't think MT has an 'innocent' bone in her entire body and imo also this goes back to the time her parents sent her half way around the world to the therapy horse farm in NY as a no doubt troubled teen.

MOO

It is nice to know that she’s not adjusting very well to her new environment.

 

[Seattle1]

After waiting five years for justice, the children addressed Troconis with scathing statements in court at her sentencing in May, with Theodore, now 18, branding her 'evil, violent, and most definitely a coward'

Michelle Troconis makes bid for freedom with bombshell legal filing

Michelle Troconis, 49, has filed a petition requesting a review of her conviction in a move that could bring the grisly case back to the courtroom.

www.dailymail.co.uk

From the quoted MSM link:

Schoenhorn added that he frequently visits former glamorous ESPN TV host Troconis at York Correctional Institution in Niantic, CT, and said she was 'very sad and stressed' the last time they spoke a few weeks ago.

And you can guess who doesn't visit MT in prison -- no 'little horn' on her visitors list!

And JLS really needs to give up on this key defense idea how Jennifer disappeared abruptly in 1990 and was estranged from her own family for four years! Jennifer was 21 in 1990! Seriously, this is no comparison to a 50 year old mother of five children in 2019. What is wrong with that man? MOO