GUILTY CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, deceased/not found, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #71

[pernickety]

Nope, it was epic fail. But, I'm still a bit shook at the fact that the Troconis crew knew about the FD lies and how unhappy MT way (I WOULD HAVE LOVED TO SEE THE MT ALBANY CHAT WITH MAMA T AND HER SISTERS!), AND YET THEY SUPPORTED THE RELATIONSHIP UNTIL THE END!

I've wondered what Papa T's 2nd wife thinks of all the money the clan throws at Michi's problems.

 

[LosAngeles]

They still don’t have anything bad to say about Dulos. What could possibly account for that? He’s dead, and cannot do anything to hurt MT…the only reason I can come up with is that it has something to do with her future appeal(s), and their assertion that Jennifer is still alive somewhere, so if FD didn’t kill her, then MT couldn’t have helped him.

Maybe she's trying to demonstrate to the new BF (Julio) that she's very trustworthy and won't, under any circumstances, share any secrets.

 

[Eli9]

Maybe she's trying to demonstrate to the new BF (Julio) that she's very trustworthy and won't, under any circumstances, share any secrets.

Lol. What's up with the boyfriend. I'm shocked he hasn't lost interest already.

 

[Jmoose]

Lol. What's up with the boyfriend. I'm shocked he hasn't lost interest already.

He might not have many prospects; I’ve actually been in an elevator with him…not that looks are everything, but he doesn’t have them. If it ever mattered to MT, she seems to have lowered her superficial standards. I’m sorry-this was mean.

 

[LosAngeles]

Well, as the saying goes "there's a lid for every pot" but there must be at least one other woman in the tri states that he could court that hasn't had such a checkered history with men and convicted of co conspiring to murder a mother of 5 children. That's one unique man.

 

[Jmoose]

Well, as the saying goes "there's a lid for every pot" but there must be at least one other woman in the tri states that he could court that hasn't had such a checkered history with men and convicted of co conspiring to murder a mother of 5 children. That's one unique man.

Hard to know what draws him to her, when she might be in prison for years.

 

[Mysticeilis]

I found this interview to be helpful - and even made me feel a little more positive in my hope that mt will not have the Habes Trial rule in her favor.

 

[LosAngeles]

I found this interview to be helpful - and even made me feel a little more positive in my hope that mt will not have the Habes Trial rule in her favor.

Very helpful & Thank You. I'm going to stay hopeful that this judge is reasonable and honors Bowman's representation at the "snapshot" of known facts at the time in question. If his judgement is penalized, honestly, I'm afraid there is no hope whatsoever to practice law in the state of Connecticut (no sanctions for Norm or Jon or Kent...come on)?

 

[pernickety]

Very helpful & Thank You. I'm going to stay hopeful that this judge is reasonable and honors Bowman's representation at the "snapshot" of known facts at the time in question. If his judgement is penalized, honestly, I'm afraid there is no hope whatsoever to practice law in the state of Connecticut (no sanctions for Norm or Jon or Kent...come on)?

Hon. Schuman's ruling will only be round one. Whatever side loses will go to the AC for a 3-judge panel decision, then possibly CT Supreme Court. Then maybe motion for reconsideration, then possibly--if MT loses--to SCOTUS.

 

[Seattle1]

I found this interview to be helpful - and even made me feel a little more positive in my hope that mt will not have the Habes Trial rule in her favor.

Thanks for link.

Guest Attorney Jim Bergen does not seem clear here that Andy Bowman was NOT MT's counsel during her murder trial when she was convicted!

Nonetheless, good to see he agrees with my earlier opinion where, take away MT's police interviews, the surveillance videos of MT riding around Hartford with Fd disposing evidence, is equally, if not more, incriminating of MT!

I guess we now wait until around August at the earliest....

To prevail with the writ, MT's legal team must prove not only that Bowman’s representation was ineffective, but also that it directly led to her conviction. They then have to prove that if he had been effective, she wouldn’t have been convicted.

For those who followed this case, I think most will agree that had MT actually cooperated with investigators from the beginning, it's doubtful FD would have ever been released on bail, and MT wouldn't have ever been charged with conspiracy to commit murder.

Nonetheless, if MT wasn't charged in January 2020, I think the clear surveillance evidence would convict MT a second time for Tampering with or Fabricating Physical Evidence, in violation of Section 53a-155 C.G.S8., and Hindering Prosecution in the First Degree, in violation of Section 53a-165aa C.G.S.16

^^rsbm

 

[Southernsnooper]

They still don’t have anything bad to say about Dulos. What could possibly account for that? He’s dead, and cannot do anything to hurt MT…the only reason I can come up with is that it has something to do with her future appeal(s), and their assertion that Jennifer is still alive somewhere, so if FD didn’t kill her, then MT couldn’t have helped him.

I think it is because his family has proof of her involvement and they will share it if she ever said anything about Fotis. That’s why from the beginning she nor her family have said anything significant. Moo

 

[sleuth66]

While waiting for the next step of the habeus process. Here’s a link to recent Habeas petitions decided in CT (including appellate and Supreme Court). Interesting reading. The bar is high, fingers crossed.

Home - CT Judicial Law Libraries' NewsLog

 

[Megnut]

I still can't get a handle on what she wants people to think she believes happened to JFd.

If she wants us to think she had no idea where FD was that morning, that she has no way of knowing anything happened to JFd, why did she hide when LE came to the house? Maybe something bad happened to one of his children or hers -- or to a sibling or parent of her own. What was there to hide from?

And with JFd reported missing sure, it was possible she was taking a break from her life. People do that. But if MT wants the public to think that's why she wasn't worried and alos innocent, how come she didn't pretend to worry -- a mom abandons her five consent and you DON'T fear self-harm? You don't DROP EVERYTHING in order to locate this mother before something bad happens?

But then when she's presented with the bloody clothes alone, are we STILL supposed to believe the gone girl narrative? She did that to HERSELF? Before fleeing? And fleeing TO WHERE? Gone girl hospital?

Couldn't have been FD because he had no motive? Favorable report?

Yeah, no.

He's the one who was dragging that divorce out -- his motive was not custody IMO. He really wanted to destroy JFd. Emotionally. Knew how to hurt her. IMO the favorable was their motive alibi -- I think they really thought gone girl was genius -- and MT is staying faithful to that narrative, even though it fell completely apart.

Remember her family saying that she just fell in love with the wrong man? Sure, that happens. But what? She accidentally overlooked that he murdered his wife and implicated her?

It leaves only one conclusion for me. She needs to be the center of attention. Doesn't have to be right or true, she just needs be in the middle of it.

Drama mama.

JMO

 

[Southernsnooper]

Remember in the arrest warrants it said the police called her several times and left her several voicemails and she didn’t return their calls? This was before AB representing her and she didn’t return their calls… why not? If she was so innocent and had nothing to hide than why did she not call them?

Again before AB she wrote her timeline of lies… in perfect English!

So it should be emphasized that those actions contributed to her guilty sentence having nothing to do with his representation. The lies would have come out regardless as she wrote them down and the police investigated and discovered the lies so her case saying the interviews would’ve changed the outcome is bs!

Also… a cheater like FD wouldn’t have left his phone with her unless it was part of this scheme and her moving it around all morning, bringing over the mop, bleach etc. lighting several fires that she couldn’t possibly cozy up to with her multiple trips back and forth, her taking the keys to try and prevent pg from taking the Tacoma bc it had blood on the seats, driving w fd to Hartford as he made several trash dumps including the stop to prop
Jd’s Suburban mat up against Milagros! How can she say he’s dumping construction items as he props up a car mat against a restaurant wall? Or stuffs a fedex envelope down a drain, talking to petu and not paying attention is so weak! He had dumpsters! Trying to save money by driving an hour away as she claimed is preposterous as he could’ve just put it as his curb for his trash collector at his house then!

Following him to the bank to withdraw cash for a complete car
Wash and full detail of the Tacoma. Sure, we are supposed to believe she had no clue!

I could go on and on but point is HER actions are why she received her sentence! Not bc of AB’S ineffectiveness! Moo

 

[acutename]

Mama shouldn’t be the arbiter of keeping MT out of trouble, either. Is that really the best these bimbos can do? I wish I knew somebody at the IRS, so I could request that they audit each of these grifting sisters and their “businesses”, too.

I am sure that they take anonymous tips.

 

[acutename]

You give her all sorts of human emotions she doesn't have!

Usually we see narcissists pair with empaths who are unaware, but here, we see two narcissists on the same stage. I don't think she's capable of love. She's capable to memememememe. FD held promise -- to serve her need. His money, her lifestyle. Till she learned he didn't have any money (which he no doubt framed differently -- blaming the divorce on his finances -- when the truth was he was overbroke, clawing for money he had no right to. Those two, clash of egos. Clashes can be noisy, sexy, intoxicating and indeed I think it was for these two cheats.

She was NEVER protecting FD. She was protecting herself. There is only one person in her universe -- everyone around her is IN or OUT based on her immediate need for them.

Her playback has one trick. Lie. Repeat the lie. She hasn't embellished, she hasn't spun a new story where FD is the villain and duped her, barfing up invented details to confirm it.

To me, that's the confession.

If she could extricate herself from the murder of JFd and hand FD and KM to LE she would have, in a heartbeat. She's faithful to no one. She can't build a story that implicated them while disimplicating herself, she's that deep in it. She ordered the code read.

She hasn't even turned on KW. Fd was a smart man -- cruel, terrible but smart -- in the sense that no one could turn on the other.

There's all this talk about her lies. Her misrememberings. None of it's even novel. If it's not on the timeline, it didn't happen. She's not a good liar, she's just a repetitive one.

She does have some natural charm but I think the word is beguiling. Not to be trusted.

 JMO

she and FD had sports and sex and the fantasy that they were wildly attractive- well, to each other. And she did like his houses and his aura of wealth- JD was like a bad bit of truth that blew apart their fantasy IMO.

 

[Southernsnooper]

This judge best not waste anymore tax payer:s money on another trial because she refused to tell the truth and all of the evidence convicted her! What a joke that would be an a bad precedent to set!

All of us from the beginning on here since 24 May 2019 have read every single detail and know that she is guilty and was given the best representation money could buy! Just because the facts spoke for themselves and she failed to get away with it as Fotis promised she would, she thinks she can wine, complain. Cry and lie her way out of her sentence is disgusting! I pray that this judge sees through it by really following the facts during the time and AB’s decades of experience and desire to actually help his client rather than harm her and ignores the paid attorney spewing textbook instruction during the habeas whom speaks years later and clearly didn’t do his homework, ,MOO

 

[acutename]

This judge best not waste anymore tax payer:s money on another trial because she refused to tell the truth and all of the evidence convicted her! What a joke that would be an a bad precedent to set!

All of us from the beginning on here since 24 May 2019 have read every single detail and know that she is guilty and was given the best representation money could buy! Just because the facts spoke for themselves and she failed to get away with it as Fotis promised she would, she thinks she can wine, complain. Cry and lie her way out of her sentence is disgusting! I pray that this judge sees through it by really following the facts during the time and AB’s decades of experience and desire to actually help his client rather than harm her and ignores the paid attorney spewing textbook instruction during the habeas whom speaks years later and clearly didn’t do his homework, ,MOO

she did choose to talk to LE- her atty did not tell her to do that and he really could not have prevented her from doing that. it did throw a monkey wrench into everything when Fotis administered the death penalty to himself. he killed JD after having 5 children (no parents now); got MT involved in his scheme; took Anna's money ... and he never repaid JD's parents, and he tried to use that employee (forgot his name) and his attorney KM in his scheme too.

 

[LosAngeles]

Let's not forget Norm Pattis saying (I'm paraphrasing) that there is an explanation for the trash bags, but he's not going to tell it. Why not? If it supports someone's innocence, why wouldn't you, as an officer of the law, provide an explanation? Why hasn't MT's trial attorneys investigated that comment and place NP on record if it exonerates his client? If you knew something critical in nature that would clear someone's name and keep them from a 14.5 year prison sentence, wouldn't you "tell it"?

 

[pernickety]

Let's not forget Norm Pattis saying (I'm paraphrasing) that there is an explanation for the trash bags, but he's not going to tell it. Why not? If it supports someone's innocence, why wouldn't you, as an officer of the law, provide an explanation? Why hasn't MT's trial attorneys investigated that comment and place NP on record if it exonerates his client? If you knew something critical in nature that would clear someone's name and keep them from a 14.5 year prison sentence, wouldn't you "tell it"?

AIR, NP did come up with an explanation--that some unknown or unnamed person put the bags with bloody evidence on FD's steps at the Farmington house in order to frame him.

But what about NP's holding on to that bucket with the sweatshirt, tools, and whatever in it and not turning it over to LE? That would be hiding evidence, maybe tampering too. AIR, after FD's death, NP sent it to AB, who then sent it to Schoenhorn, who did that hot-potato thing with it that almost got him thrown off the case--having female attorney (who became a judge) try to give it to LE, not realizing there was a letter in it she was supposed to read, but LE wasn't supposed to read.