GUILTY CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, deceased/not found, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #71

[tricia]

THIS SATURDAY = GUARDIAN ZOOM MADNESS
It’s EPIC.
It’s 8 HOURS.
It’s our MONTHLY GUARDIAN ZOOM CALL — and you’re invited!
Saturday, January 17
12 NOON – 8 PM Eastern
(Yes, really. No, you don’t have to stay the whole time )

YOU MUST REGISTER FIRST — CLICK HERE to register
Pro tip: You do NOT have to use your real name. Your Websleuths username is perfect.
WHAT WILL WE TALK ABOUT?

(Here are a few ideas but we can talk about almost anything you want)​

What case drives you absolutely crazy — and why
What changes you’d like to see on Websleuths
Your brush with fame (we KNOW you have one)
And lots more laughs, surprises, and great conversation

FREE STUFF!​

We’ll be giving away FREE Guardian memberships
You can nominate Websleuths members you think deserve one — because kindness matters.

REGISTER HERE for the call
Want to become a Guardian? CLICK HERE — it’s easy and only $3/month

Come and go as you please.
Pop in. Pop out. Stay 10 minutes or all day — it’s totally up to you.

Check out the screenshot from our last Guardian call…
See? We’re a fun bunch! That's me in the middle in the "Alice" square if you are looking at this like the Brady Bunch.

 

[LosAngeles]

The State probably knows the ropes in CT, and wasn’t being lazy, but more likely practical-you know, like they may have realized that their appeal would go no place, so why expend the energy. They know these judges don’t want to bother with all of the separate charges when they can stick the defendant with one, especially when everything’s going to run concurrently, and the defendant won’t spend another day in jail. I didn’t care so much about the second tampering charge, but I really wanted the judge to stick her with the contempt charge. Not doing so only enboldens people like MT.

Yes, it emboldens and sets a new legal precedence for future defendants, which is never a good idea (IMO). I've learned so much about the legal system in Connecticut and it's a bit eyeopening. Not sure if I were a recent law school graduate I'd pick to sit for the bar in Connecticut. I might live in Connecticut and practice in NY, but not a big fan of the apparent biased and surprisingly underwhelming judicial system.

 

[Jmoose]

Yes, it emboldens and sets a new legal precedence for future defendants, which is never a good idea (IMO). I've learned so much about the legal system in Connecticut and it's a bit eyeopening. Not sure if I were a recent law school graduate I'd pick to sit for the bar in Connecticut. I might live in Connecticut and practice in NY, but not a big fan of the apparent biased and surprisingly underwhelming judicial system.

It certainly does appear to be an underwhelming system, doesn’t it?

 

[BJarv]

It certainly does appear to be an underwhelming system, doesn’t it?

Underwhelming is too kind imo. It’s dysfunctional and does little to nothing to help provide justice to victims.

 

[waldojabba]

Gifted

Attorneys representing the state have opted not to present any witnesses in the habeas trial of Michelle Troconis, who is challenging her conviction in the death of Jennifer Dulos.

https://www.ctinsider.com/news/article/michelle-troconis-habeas-trial-ends-jennifer-dulos-21294836.php?utm_content=hed&sid=64de8f9094fd99647a0d23e4&ss=A&st_rid=fc410aae-714c-45eb-80e3-e0c02e0ca4a5&utm_source=marketing&utm_medium=copy-url-link&utm_term=test&utm_campaign=article-share&hash=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuY3RpbnNpZGVyLmNvbS9uZXdzL2FydGljbGUvbWljaGVsbGUtdHJvY29uaXMtaGFiZWFzLXRyaWFsLWVuZHMtamVubmlmZXItZHVsb3MtMjEyOTQ4MzYucGhw&time=MTc2ODQyNjMwMzkyNA%3D%3D&rid=ZmM0MTBhYWUtNzE0Yy00NWViLTgwZTMtZTBjMDJlMGNhNGE1&sharecount=MQ%3D%3D

 

[Jmoose]

Underwhelming is too kind imo. It’s dysfunctional and does little to nothing to help provide justice to victims.

I think it’s nothing but a dog and pony show-nothing to do with justice for victims.

 

[Seattle1]

Gifted

Attorneys representing the state have opted not to present any witnesses in the habeas trial of Michelle Troconis, who is challenging her conviction in the death of Jennifer Dulos.

https://www.ctinsider.com/news/article/michelle-troconis-habeas-trial-ends-jennifer-dulos-21294836.php?utm_content=hed&sid=64de8f9094fd99647a0d23e4&ss=A&st_rid=fc410aae-714c-45eb-80e3-e0c02e0ca4a5&utm_source=marketing&utm_medium=copy-url-link&utm_term=test&utm_campaign=article-share&hash=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuY3RpbnNpZGVyLmNvbS9uZXdzL2FydGljbGUvbWljaGVsbGUtdHJvY29uaXMtaGFiZWFzLXRyaWFsLWVuZHMtamVubmlmZXItZHVsb3MtMjEyOTQ4MzYucGhw&time=MTc2ODQyNjMwMzkyNA%3D%3D&rid=ZmM0MTBhYWUtNzE0Yy00NWViLTgwZTMtZTBjMDJlMGNhNGE1&sharecount=MQ%3D%3D

1/14/26

VERNON — Attorneys representing the state have opted not to present any witnesses in the habeas trial of Michelle Troconis, who is challenging her conviction in the death of Jennifer Dulos.

The move effectively puts an end to the three-day trial that took place in Rockville Superior Court, where most habeas cases are heard. The trial date scheduled for Friday has been canceled, according to documents filed in court Wednesday. Attorneys representing Troconis rested their case Tuesday after calling three witnesses.

[..]

Senior Assistant State’s Attorney Russell C. Zentner, representing the state, had until Thursday afternoon to decide whether he wanted to called witnesses to buttress his defense that Bowman was competent and Troconis' conviction should stand.

@Niner

 

[Jmoose]

Either Zentner determined that he didn’t need to do any more than what he did, or he figures the judge has already made up his mind, and no more effort would help.

 

[Megnut]

MT is a Teflon Dawn.

Judge Randolph hoped she'd use her period of incarceration to self-correct, as if she had a wealth of positive traits to work on.

Instead, she's using her time to try to slither out of the consequences of her vile actions, and a lenient sentence at that.

Bottom line here is I think she truly doesn't think she did anything wrong.

Which is the evilest part of it.

JMO

 

[Megnut]

I am watching parts of the Brendan Banfield trial. He was having an affair with their au pair. His wife was stabbed to death, they lured a stranger to the home who BB shot and then au pair fired the fatal shot. Two deceased individuals, a major conspiracy to commit murder. And she got a sweetheart deal, pleading guilty to the reduced charge of manslaughter, in exchange for testifying against him. Likely to get a 10 year sentenced, reduced to time served.

If MT had listened to her own attorney and remained silent, she may have been acquitted. If she had listened to her own attorney and agreed to testify against FD, she may have gotten the sweetest of sweetheart deals.

MT had her own agenda.

I hope this judge upholds AB's representation.

It's ironic that her other attorneys -- from Schoenhorn to her appellate ones -- all claim she wasn't lying anyway. She was just misremembering.

Even if AB spent 100 hours with her (though time was off the essence) to feel her out, how was he supposed to know whether she was lying or misrepresenting? She was convincing. To AB, to some of the investigators -- and in that context, it was effective counsel to work for a cooperation deal.

And truly, the time for it was THEN, before the body might be found, potentially incriminating her more, but also erasing want hope of a deal.

JMO

 

[carolmaria]

MT is a Teflon Dawn.

Judge Randolph hoped she'd use her period of incarceration to self-correct, as if she had a wealth of positive traits to work on.

Instead, she's using her time to try to slither out of the consequences of her vile actions, and a lenient sentence at that.

Bottom line here is I think she truly doesn't think she did anything wrong.

Which is the evilest part of it.

JMO

It is the evilest part.

Yes, I was dismayed when he referred to her numerous positive traits, I forget the wording. It had been bad enough, the parade of sycophants during “victim impact” statements.

Bothered me on several levels — how her extreme malice (not to mention courtroom behavior) IMO nullified her positive traits, the effect on JF’s family, hearing that (did he really have to put it that way?) etc.

 

[Megnut]

And honestly, if she had a beating heart and was not a party to the FD-MT-KM conspiracy, she would have dissolved in horror. Imagine being shocked to learn what you're belived boyfriend had done, and worse, implicated you in it, even though you had no part, or didn't know he'd used you to complete his mission. It would be devastating. To think you'd unwittingly advanced murder. Of a mother. And the children, who you'd come to know, you'd be broken for them.

Or not. Michelle, marriage interloper, has the GALL to be put-out that the divorce wasn't divorcing fast enough. Torture. As if.

What about JFd's torture? Cheating husband moves his mistress in. 100s of motions. Psychological warfare.

The real question is why MT didn't grab on to the cooperation opportunity.

It wasn't because she was hungry.

It wasn't because she was tired.

It wasn't because she didn't understand.

It wasn't because she got bad advice from her lawyer.

It's really the only question TO ask.

There's only one reason NOT to cooperate

She believed she could lie her way out of it.

Still does, apparently.

Problem is, her lies expose the truth.

She was intimately involved in the plan to murder and conceal JFd.

JMO

 

[BJarv]

Marissa alter is reporting the decision of the state to NOT present more witnesses.

I disagree and think that atty bowman should have a platform to rebut the wild speculation made by another local atty who didn’t read the entire transcript or ask for bowman’s notes.

I’m simply out of words for any of this as folks here have said it all.

I don’t think there are rights for victims or justice for victims in CT. I don’t think the States attys care anymore as they have been demoralized for years by the Judiciary and AG and bail and prison reform.

We saw the State decline to appeal the two tossed hindering convictions of judge Randolph and also fail to prosecute the Herman report on MT computer that was captured on video tape and streamed live.

There is a culture in CT that doesn’t believe incarceration and a judiciary that imo does not support law enforcement or their colleagues who are the trial judges such as judge Randolph. I personally don’t think these judges care about victims or even justice.

This is all awful to say but I’ve been watching this all play out over and over in court for years in Corrupticut and as awful as it it to type these statements out on here, it’s worse to see it played out in real life over and over.

https://www.reddit.com/r/JenniferDulos/s/WaGXFsIHat

 

[Megnut]

Each side still must prepare a brief for the Court. The hearing was unnecessary, could have been achieved without the stage IMO. No doubt MT's team postures for it. To attempt to persuade the masses that MT is the victim here. As if.

I hope the State's draft is a thing of beauty and knocks MT's whiny habeas on its flat backside.

JMO

 

[Jmoose]

MT is a Teflon Dawn.

Judge Randolph hoped she'd use her period of incarceration to self-correct, as if she had a wealth of positive traits to work on.

Instead, she's using her time to try to slither out of the consequences of her vile actions, and a lenient sentence at that.

Bottom line here is I think she truly doesn't think she did anything wrong.

Which is the evilest part of it.

JMO

I agree-she really doesn’t think she did anything wrong. She didn’t kill Jennifer, and didn’t “clean Jennifer”, so doesn’t understand that helping plan the murder, and facilitate the aftermath is something to be guilty of. I don’t doubt that she thinks she is innocent, for this reason.

 

[BJarv]

Gotta love a good Dr Leslie Dobson short video! She is a CA based forensic psychologist and expert witness and her latest short video series is on a personal favorite topic "PSYCHOPATHY"! She spent many years working in prisons in the CA doing evaluations of inmates and so she has imo met many folks like everyones least favorite convicted felon in CT, Michelle Troconis!

I was doom scrolling after reading the Melissa Alter short article about the State of CT not choosing to present any witnesses on Friday and isn't it amazing how GOD always provides the right video for the moment!

The series starts off strong here imo with a brief overview of what is supposed to be coming in terms of details to learn more about PSYCHOPATHY. Dr Leslie explains that 'sociopathy' is no longer a relevant term and she gives a short explanation of 'PSYCHOPATHY'!

I very much wonder if this is perhaps WHY Atty Bowman engaged the Neuro Psychologist to do an evaluation of Michelle Troconis? Sad he never told us in his testimony.

Enjoy.

 

[Seattle1]

It is the evilest part.

Yes, I was dismayed when he referred to her numerous positive traits, I forget the wording. It had been bad enough, the parade of sycophants during “victim impact” statements.

Bothered me on several levels — how her extreme malice (not to mention courtroom behavior) IMO nullified her positive traits, the effect on JF’s family, hearing that (did he really have to put it that way?) etc.

Hear, hear! I too had difficulty with Randolph's demeanor and words of encouragement when sentencing MT.

I recall that I was coming off the sentencing of Lori Milliron, and hearing the reality of lying to the grand jury to protect her lover (perjury), and being an accessory after the fact to murder, echoed by U.S. Senior District Judge William J. Martinez, who presided over the federal sentencing. Milliron was the office manager/sidepiece of wealthy dentist Lawrence Rudolph, convicted of killing his wife Bianca on an African Safari.

The Court granted an upward variance from the sentence recommended by the United States Sentencing Guidelines, referencing the underlying nature of the murder and trial evidence indicating that it was more likely than not that Milliron aided and abetted its execution by helping Rudolph obtain several vials of propofol, an anesthetic drug that is deadly at certain doses, before two of Rudolph and Bianca’s scheduled Zambian safaris. The Court also referenced Milliron’s torment of the victim’s family, and her lack of remorse. In addition to a sentence of 204 months in federal prison, the Court imposed the maximum fine of $250,000.

Standing in front of the judge, Milliron insisted she was innocent of the crimes and that she was "sympathetic" to the Rudolph family. In sentencing her to 17 years, Judge Martinez provided
that the long sentence was deserved because evidence pointed to Milliron "encouraging" the crime.
Martínez added that Milliron seemed "unrepentant," in part because he judged her emotionally unmoved when she was shown graphic images and listened to wrenching testimony during the trial. In other words, this Judge was watching, observing her in his courtroom!

Milliron's attorney, John Dill, said the prison sentence was longer than what is typically dolled out for such charges, calling it "excessive" and vowing to appeal. Dill argued that the convictions were merely based on Milliron's perjury charges and do not implicate her in the execution of the crime.

Accessory to Zambia Safari Murder Sentenced to 17 Years in Federal Prison

DENVER –The United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Colorado announces that Lori Milliron, 65, formerly of Paradise Valley, Arizona, was sentenced to 17 years in federal prison for her role as an accessory in the murder of Bianca Rudolph. Milliron had previously been convicted of...

www.justice.gov