- Joined
- Sep 17, 2019
- Messages
- 598
- Reaction score
- 7,611
Oh, she speaks fluent english now? Unbelievable.MT spends her days trying to be a "life coach" to other inmates??!!
Oh, she speaks fluent english now? Unbelievable.MT spends her days trying to be a "life coach" to other inmates??!!
Sick and twisted, isn’t it?MT spends her days trying to be a "life coach" to other inmates??!!
What's her message? "When given the opportunity in life to be truthful, lie"?Sick and twisted, isn’t it?
You could just zoom it, too?Inadvertent means without knowledge or intent. Having a document displayed on your computer screen in a GIANT font is not at all without knowledge or intent. You have to “click” on the document, highlight the print and “click” on the upper arrow to increase the font size so everyone in the courtroom can read it. That takes knowledge and/or intent. Sounds like she’s represented by another bozo.
MT's attorney, Crossland, was on WICC radio this a.m. (Melissa in the Morning). Going on about it being the fault of Law & Crime video-ing. One other thing he said--that it wasn't even MT's computer, but the same computer her attorney used, even to bringing it with them to examine witnesses on the stand. ??? That's what I understood him to say. Was there footage of Felsen having a separate computer? If not--is this a wow? That the report was on Felsen's computer--and she told the court she'd only see one or 2 pages of the report--the hard copy?Inadvertent means without knowledge or intent. Having a document displayed on your computer screen in a GIANT font is not at all without knowledge or intent. You have to “click” on the document, highlight the print and “click” on the upper arrow to increase the font size so everyone in the courtroom can read it. That takes knowledge and/or intent. Sounds like she’s represented by another bozo.
MT's attorney, Crossland, was on WICC radio this a.m. (Melissa in the Morning). Going on about it being the fault of Law & Crime video-ing. One other thing he said--that it wasn't even MT's computer, but the same computer her attorney used, even to bringing it with them to examine witnesses on the stand. ??? That's what I understood him to say. Was there footage of Felsen having a separate computer? If not--is this a wow? That the report was on Felsen's computer--and she told the court she'd only see one or 2 pages of the report--the hard copy?
![]()
Defendant Michelle Troconis, right, and her defense attorney Audrey Felsen speak during Troconis' criminal trial at Connecticut Superior Court in Stamford, Conn., Monday, Feb. 5, 2024. Troconis is on trial for charges related to the disappearance and
Download this stock image: Defendant Michelle Troconis, right, and her defense attorney Audrey Felsen speak during Troconis' criminal trial at Connecticut Superior Court in Stamford, Conn., Monday, Feb. 5, 2024. Troconis is on trial for charges related to the disappearance and death of New...www.alamy.com
Looks like 2 computers in above image.
Here's the audio--around 6:16 to 6:50 -I don't think MT's attorney Crossland has his facts straight.
First, MT was out on bond during the entire trial and therefore had access to her own laptop unlike many defendants who are held in custody and do not have computers while they are in jail and are transported to Court daily for the trial. Second, I think Crossland is conflating that MT was barred from bringing her personal laptop to Court following the allegation she was displaying the report, and that is when I believe MT used the laptop of counsel but not before. MOO
Here's a video clip of the Judge banning MT from bringing her computer to court.
Judge issues warning to courtroom, bars Troconis from having laptop during trial
It may not have technically belonged to her, but that computer was on that table specifically for her use, and not for the use of her attorneys. She was pulling up other stuff on that computer, too, if I recall, but she didn’t deliberately turn the computer so that whatever was on it, could be caught by the videographer. And if it wasn’t there for her sole use, how did she know that the report would exist on that computer, and where to find it?MT's attorney, Crossland, was on WICC radio this a.m. (Melissa in the Morning). Going on about it being the fault of Law & Crime video-ing. One other thing he said--that it wasn't even MT's computer, but the same computer her attorney used, even to bringing it with them to examine witnesses on the stand. ??? That's what I understood him to say. Was there footage of Felsen having a separate computer? If not--is this a wow? That the report was on Felsen's computer--and she told the court she'd only see one or 2 pages of the report--the hard copy?
![]()
Defendant Michelle Troconis, right, and her defense attorney Audrey Felsen speak during Troconis' criminal trial at Connecticut Superior Court in Stamford, Conn., Monday, Feb. 5, 2024. Troconis is on trial for charges related to the disappearance and
Download this stock image: Defendant Michelle Troconis, right, and her defense attorney Audrey Felsen speak during Troconis' criminal trial at Connecticut Superior Court in Stamford, Conn., Monday, Feb. 5, 2024. Troconis is on trial for charges related to the disappearance and death of New...www.alamy.com
Looks like 2 computers in above image.
Or how to land on that particular page of a multi-page document?It may not have technically belonged to her, but that computer was on that table specifically for her use, and not for the use of her attorneys. She was pulling up other stuff on that computer, too, if I recall, but she didn’t deliberately turn the computer so that whatever was on it, could be caught by the videographer. And if it wasn’t there for her sole use, how did she know that the report would exist on that computer, and where to find it?
I hope she uses the wall picture she had taken of herself as art work behind her as she ‘preaches’ her gospel. The one with all the ‘hair’. I better stop here.What's her message? "When given the opportunity in life to be truthful, lie"?
Thanks for the radio link.
That radio host tends to be agreeable with her guests, I've noticed.Crossland is misleading the radio host and the public about how this contempt charge is just being punitive and any penalty would be served concurrent to her conspiracy to commit murder sentence, and a waste of the Court's time.
For a defense attorney, Felson is pretty unobservant (if I actually believe that she had no idea what was happening inches away from her!)Attorneys Schoenhorn and Felsen's claims appear to negate Crossland's story. I trust the State will subpoena each of them to set the record straight!
![]()
Warrant: Video confirms sealed custody report was on Michelle Troconis’ laptop at trial
Troconis was officially charged with criminal contempt of court after the verdict came down for allegedly displaying a court-sealed custody report pertaining to the Dulos divorce case on her laptop.connecticut.news12.com
March 7, 2024
Troconis was officially charged with criminal contempt of court after the verdict came down for allegedly displaying a court-sealed custody report pertaining to the Dulos divorce case on her laptop.
The report was part of the ongoing contentious custody battle between Jennifer and Fotis Dulos. It was completed in April 2019, but neither party was allowed to have a copy of it.
The guardian ad litem for the five Dulos children said each parent and their attorney had to come to his office to view the evaluation. The following month a family court judge sealed the report just before Jennifer Dulos vanished.
[...]
On May 26, 2021, Judge John Blawie ruled Troconis’ defense counsel could get a copy of the sealed report but with the restriction that it could not be shared. The State’s Attorney’s Office said Troconis was present for that proceeding.
Troconis knowingly violated a court order by “unlawfully possessing the document that she knew was sealed from herself and the public, uploading it to her computer and displaying it in open court in the direct line of sight of media personnel currently live streaming the proceedings,” the warrant stated.
During the trial, News 12 asked attorney Jon Schoenhorn if his client had the report, “to my knowledge she does not have that report. She did not get it from me. Let's put it that way.”
His co-counsel, attorney Audrey Felsen, sat beside Troconis at trial, including when the alleged document was on her screen. But Felsen told the court she didn’t know anything about it.
“I have not reviewed the report in its entirety. I’ve never seen it on a computer. I have reviewed the last four or five pages that I was provided, and they were in paper form. I can say that I have never shared the contents of the report with Ms. Troconis. I don't know in fact whether she was reading from a memo or what it was,” Felsen told the judge.
Unobservant? It appears she was looking right at it!For a defense attorney, Felson is pretty unobservant (if I actually believe that she had no idea what was happening inches away from her!)
Unobservant? It appears she was looking right at it!
View attachment 580207
Blocking adding to obscure the screen
![]()
Sealed custody report viewed on Michelle Troconis’ laptop during trial, contempt warrant alleges
An arrest warrant affidavit obtained by the Hartford Courant details the contempt of court charge that Michelle Troconis incurred during her criminal trial.www.courant.com
Yep-that is exactly what I sawUnobservant? It appears she was looking right at it!
View attachment 580207
Blocking adding to obscure the screen
![]()
Sealed custody report viewed on Michelle Troconis’ laptop during trial, contempt warrant alleges
An arrest warrant affidavit obtained by the Hartford Courant details the contempt of court charge that Michelle Troconis incurred during her criminal trial.www.courant.com
And wasn't her response to the court something about not giving it to her and only having seen four pages of it herself?Yep-that is exactly what I saw
Yes @Megnut ….. and sad IMO how quickly it seems others forget. If not for the quick, alert, and responsive actions of IIRC prosecutor Michelle Manning and Judge Kevin Randolph that ‘sealed report’ or portions of it could have been entered on the record in the trial. And IIRC both of the convicted defendants defense counsel attempted to have the ‘sealed report’ or excerpts of it entered into evidence. One of them IIRC tried twice, once even after I believe the judge stated it was not to be entered. And it was Manning that caught that individual still trying to have it placed into evidence. IANAL. SMH.And wasn't her response to the court something about not giving it to her and only having seen four pages of it herself?
How'd she know it wasn't one of those four pages, as her quick answer rather implies?
Same attorneys who tried to slide it in with exhibits. And we're to believe they didn't know what MT was trying to do?
Hail Mary, throw the trial?
We can be sure it was carefully orchestrated whatever it was.
JMO
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.