GUILTY CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, deceased/not found, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #71

[Megnut]

AB believed she was innocent. He felt she had information which would help the State in its prosecution of FD, while not being harmful to her.

 

[Megnut]

False information in the warrant -- about thirty trash stops.

Other warrant was sealed for 30 days.

AB keeps stressing how he told MT she had to tell the truth. Avoid obstruction. Just tell the truth.

He says MT decided to go in.

AB had a DUTY to advise her, she didn't have to do this, she had the right to remain silence, only talk to them if she was going to be truthful.

He fully advised her.

 

[Megnut]

MOO

This really is wild. He gave her rock solid advice. Agree to talk to the State only if she intended to be honest. Otherwise, do not.

How is her decision to lie his fault?

MOO

 

[Megnut]

AB he brought her mother in a couple times to translate, if MT didn't understand him. But he could she had facility in English.

 

[Megnut]

MOO

Are you KIDDING ME???

Defense implies MT didn't understand what accessory (to murder) meant, that she thought it meant jewelry.

Put a fork in it.

She's done.

JMO

 

[Megnut]

AB says MT declined an interpreter three times.

 

[Megnut]

MOO

Defense is trying to pin it on AB that MT didn't have an interpreter.

When MT is the one who declined having one, repeatedly.

And she doesn't have one in the courtroom today.

So does that make this defense attorney ineffective as counsel?

News flash: MT doesn't need an interpreter. And everyone knows it.

MOO

 

[Megnut]

Lunch recess until 2pm EST.

 

[Jmoose]

MT told him how she'd met FD, that FD's divide attorbey said they should write down their activities of the day.

It was news to her that FD had been at JFd's that Wednesday.

I still don’t understand why she thought she needed to coordinate with Dulos, on the events of the day. If she wasn’t involved, and had no knowledge of his whereabouts and his actions, why did she think she needed a timeline at all? Or why couldn’t she do one independently of him?

 

[BJarv]

Trial AM Session Video


Day 1 Trial Video - AM Session

 

[waldojabba]

Love that AB can talk freely being released from attorney client privlege. His statements are making her look even more guilty than before and we see from him how she was out to manipulate and gaslight the narrative.

IMO this is a foolish move on MT’s part.
Altho she has nothing to lose but her Dads money - so maybe just a little diversion from the clink.

Did anyone see in the shot of the court room whether the boyfriend is there?

In the article I gifted it says Carrie Luft and a few others are there in person . I do admire her loyalty to her friend and her family.

Bowman asked her three times if she wanted an interpreter - how many times is enough Michi?

JMO

 

[Jmoose]

DA told AB that was MT was lying. Not impressed with her credibility.

And that made her out to be a witness of low value, so they didn’t offer her immunity. They knew, and Bowman knew. Bowman appears to have also known that she might lie, so he told her that he did not want her talking to the police, but that if she did, she had to be truthful.

 

[BJarv]

There is no live stream for habeas corpus petitions which are heard only by the Judge, and no jury is present. Also, on 12/26/25, the State filed a Caseflow Request -- seeking the court provide a remote link to the courtroom for the victim's family (including victim's 90 year old mother) to have access to the proceeding.

https://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentInquiry/DocumentInquiry.aspx?DocumentNo=31676785

Actually I think the Judge this am said that there will be live coverage. Judge did brief interview with the Convicted Felon to make sure she understood that she is waiving attorney client privilege with Bowman as part of this proceeding. She said she understood.....

Here is link to AM session:

 

[Jmoose]

It was a live feed until about one second after I linked it.

I can't find a live feed anywhere now!

They’re on lunch break until 2 eastern time

 

[Jmoose]

Love that AB can talk freely being released from attorney client privlege. His statements are making her look even more guilty than before and we see from him how she was out to manipulate and gaslight the narrative.

IMO this is a foolish move on MT’s part.
Altho she has nothing to lose but her Dads money - so maybe just a little diversion from the clink.

Did anyone see in the shot of the court room whether the boyfriend is there?

In the article I gifted it says Carrie Luft and a few others are there in person . I do admire her loyalty to her friend and her family.

Bowman asked her three times if she wanted an interpreter - how many times is enough Michi?

JMO

Yes, the Churro King is there.

 

[BJarv]

Yes, the Churro King is there.

Yep, the entire crew is present. I just started watching the morning session and I LOVE the idea that MT had to waive attorney client privilege with Bowman and I cannot wait to see what he has to say!

 

[Fromeaster]

I wonder how she's doing in prison, I hope she's suffering. A new hairstyle won't help her.

 

[I am not Sherlock H.]

AB told her she DID NOT need to go into that interview, but only to go in if she intended to tell the truth. SHE COULD NOT LIE.

The only thing @Megnut that would be even better IMO is if attorney AB had also instructed then the now convicted felon that in writing. And could produce that to the court now? IANAL. MOO

 

[BJarv]

Listening to the Bowman testimony now and his initial assessment of MT. Love the comment he made that, "....sometimes you are right and sometimes you are wrong..." in your initial assessments!

Listening to Bowmans account of the initial contact with Fotis and MT is fascinating as I'd always wondered about the web of attorney contacts in this case. Fairfield Country is a very small universe and it seems that the attorneys involved were all speaking with each other. I do very much wonder why Attorney Riccio did not appear to take on Dulos and I wonder if the process of Dulos making his way to Pattis is ever clarified? I do also wonder by Attorney Riccio didn't take on MT but perhaps he had a conflict due to speaking with Dulos previously. Fascinating to see the role played by Attorney Rose here in finding attorneys as he was the Hartford attorney who was most recently part of the entire Family Court debacle with the Herman Report and the corrupt GAL Attorney Meehan and the 'theft' of the report by Dulos. Family Court Judge had dismissed Attorney Rose from her Court for his role in the entire mess and I will never in a million years understand WHY she chose to not refer him to the CT Bar for review and ditto for GAL Attorney Meehan? CT Judges so far as I can see rarely make referrals and so the behaviour of these imo quite corrupt attorneys never changes and frankly is never made public in a way to make clear to prospective clients (and their opponents) precisely who these attorneys are as professionals and their imo convenient grasp of the rules of professional conduct. Attorney Rose also was reprimanded on the record in Family Court for his role in facilitating the lying of Dulos on the financial disclosures as he had prepared the most recent disclosures that absolutely enraged the Family Court Judge as she knew the information to be false and the forms fabricated. AND YET, THE JUDGE DISMISSED ATTORNEY ROSE FROM HER COURT RATHER THAN REFERRING HIM TO THE CT BAR FOR FULL INVESTIGATION.

The Bowman testimony so far imo as it relates to MT is quite damning as it appears she tried from Day 1 to 'sell and sell hard' her own attorney on her innocence and used the timeline as part of her discussion with her attorney. I do wonder if at any point and with any of her attorneys do we see MT backing off of the timeline or her early claim to Bowman that Dulos had not murdered his wife? I'm fixated on this idea of the co conspirators with their 'pre baked' narrative and then selling this narrative to their respective attorneys. I do wonder if Atty Riccio saw through this pre baked narrative and perhaps had some undisclosed information from NCPD on the contents of the Dulos phone which had been seized and that is why he might not have taken on Dulos as a client? Still so many questions....back to watching.

 

[Megnut]

Live again. Defense asking questions --

Did you stop the interview?

Did you ask MT why the trash stops weren't in the timeline?