Would the owner of the red truck have left the keys either in the truck or with FD if he wasn’t asked specifically to do so? Just trying to get a feel for how likely it is that “the employee” would have left his truck there knowing that FD would likely move it/drive it, especially since it was apparently left where the exchange took place, but we still think FD drove it. If FD drove it with the employee’s knowlege, he (FD) could have parked it anywhere, and said “just pick it up at this location-I had to use it”. But would “the employee” have left his keys with it if he didn’t know FD would need it?
Leaving the truck parked at 80MS in hopes the employee would think that FD did not drive the red truck at all, on that Friday was not an accident.
I asked earlier if maybe the ex-employee lived around Albany Avenue in the Hartford 'Area' and it got me to thinking.
If the ex-employee lived around Albany Avenue or anywhere in between Hartford and Farmington, it would not be unreasonable to assume that FD and EE (ex-employee) exchanged the trucks each day.
Perhaps, they normally exchanged vehicles at 4JC, since that would be on EE's way to 80MS if EE lived north of 4JC.
However, FD may well have asked to meet at 80MS on That Particular Friday, so that FD could use the 'idea' or 'illusion' that the red truck Stayed Parked at 80MS All Day on that Friday.
Making the exchange at 80MS would leave FD without a vehicle to get home and he would then need EE's red truck keys to get back home to get a different vehicle.
Returning to pick up his red truck at 80MS would make EE think his red truck was never used that Friday, May 24, 2019 by FD.
FD used the leaving of the red truck at 80MS and Walking home as an 'Illusion' that the red truck had not been driven that Friday by FD.
Yes, normally, FD would not need the red truck keys if the truck was parked at 4JC, where FD had access to his other vehicles.
However, this One day, he and the EE met at 80MS, early in the morning.
IMO.
