There is absolutely nothing wrong with circumstantial evidence, It is used in courtrooms throughout America every day to convict people. You know what is not circumstantial, though? Those videos of FD dumping bloody sponges, etc, containing his wife's DNA, which are direct physical evidence linking him to JD's murder. You notice that his lawyer is staying quiet on that damning evidence-which the jury is going to see! The most FP has said is that those videos "look bad", he has an explanation for that conduct, but he is not going to tell us (or LE) what it is. Odd, FB likes to run his mouth, on and on and on, but even he cannot come up with a reason for why FD is dumping bloody evidence in a city over an hour from JD's home, in a manner clearly designed (at least FD thought) to avoid detection. FD will be charged with murder, whether of not JD's body is ever recovered. For the sake of her family, however, I am hopeful that they will be able to properly bury and grieve for her. If FD cared for his children, as he claims to, the least he could do is tell LE how he disposed of JD's body. I'm not holding my breath; his malignant narcissism is his only guiding light.