D
Deleted member 229974
Guest
I wonder if LE is checking out this guy’s property and whereabouts.I have been thinking about this new revelation concerning FD's divorce attorney's potential involvement in this murder. Remember the interview the chief of police gave to the reporter from Court TV? He said at the time more arrests could be coming (or words to that effect). Makes me think that our theories this lawyer and his potential involvement with this crime may be correct.
If nothing else, he had a non-privileged conversation of conversations about FD contacting the lawyer's estranged wife. FD had a plan; IMO the lawyer played some role, even IF he wasn't aware of what those plans were. I normally would give the lawyer the benefit of the doubt, and say he didn't know what FD was up to, but what lawyer in their right mind would solicit a client in a high conflict divorce to violate a no-contact order? Such conduct is highly improper and will result in disbarment in most states. This little town in Connecticut certainly seems to have plenty of "Peyton Place" drama.
Also, I strongly believe this lawyer was FD's claimed alibi. Now we have a false alibi which, if FD were innocent, why would he fabricated a false alibi? Consciousness of guilt, my friends, consciousness of guilt. Not sure how this piece of evidence could get to a jury, but it is quite telling. It will be interesting if the prosecutor offers the lawyer limited immunity to tell LE what he knows about FD's plans. Remember, there is a crime fraud exception to the attorney privilege, so those conversations will not be protected. Since this lawyer is charged the serious offense of marital rape, however, IMO his cooperation with FD investigation will not result is a "free pass."
I will definitely be looking to see how this new piece of evidence plays out.