Silver Alert CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #21

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #1,341
IMHO a lawyer’s reputation does not rest upon the type of client they represent. It rests upon how they can assist the client for the best outcome, given the facts presented to the lawyer from all sources, about the client and the situation they are facing.
Well said! And I agree. No matter who you are or what you believe, you have a Constitutional right to counsel. The following is mentioned in the ABA’s Rules of Professional Conduct:

“A lawyer's representation of a client, including representation by appointment, does not constitute an endorsement of the client's political, economic, social or moral views or activities.”
Model Rules of Professional Conduct: Table of Contents

And yes, the evidence indicates that MT played a large role in these crimes and appears to be an evil gold digger but she still has a right to effective and ethical legal representation.

MOO
 
  • #1,342
  • #1,343
I am going to venture and say yes, especially after living here in CT and seeing what I have seen. The expanse between the haves and the have nots is the width of the Atlantic, with the haves absolutely clueless (or at least they act clueless) as to how the have nots and the rest of the world actually survives. Every single time my husband and I have been taken advantage of here it has been by someone far richer, with access to everything we don't have. It seems to be the name of the game here. If I had been PG, and my life is probably very comparable, I would have been scared to death when I put together what was happening. Over the fact I would need to quit my job, how would my family survive and how would this affect them, how would I hire an attorney and where would that money come from since I don't have family to help me, etc., etc. I am sure it would have taken me some time to figure it all out too.
So well said and absolutely correct about CT IMO. I didn't do as well as you explaining it earlier this evening and people jumped on me a bit for saying EE would have been terrified and the financial issues were huge as well. I remember ages ago trying to find an atty for a small matter and it took 3 weeks because nobody would take less than $15,000 retainer. It was pure craziness IMO. So glad EE found someone that understands his situation and I am sure will take excellent care of EE and his family as Pattisville will come out guns blazing. MOO
 
  • #1,344
Hey, this intel isn't going to last much longer as I'm movin' on out immenintly. Better enjoy it while you can, haha :)

Lol! Just be careful in CT and on your way to CA!
 
  • #1,345
I think if LE believed they needed an interpreter they would have used one.

I do think she was saying that the body of Jennifer was in the Tacoma because of the evidence that was provided her, but I thought she was just being coy.
Instead of stating that she knew it for a fact, she phrased it in such a way as to suggest she assumes it's true because LE found her blood there.

It's just a way of avoiding the question and not directly admitting to it.
I think she understands just fine. Imo
Absolutely. She knows everything, and lied her 🤬🤬🤬 off over those interviews.

I hope she pays a price for that, and for her involvement.
 
  • #1,346
MT was born in TN but went back to Caracas with her family shortly after birth we believe and received all her schooling and university in Venezuela. We have no reason to believe that English is MT first language. Her father was in TN doing his residency at the time of MT birth so it is believed that he speaks english and MT mother was previously a licensed psychologist (no longer) and is also believed to speak english.

My guess is that the language spoken in the home is Spanish but this is pure speculation.

But the language in the arrest warrant IMO heard from MT appears disjointed, unclear and incomplete. I do wish that LE would investigate further on the language issue to make sure that the correct language is being used for MT in these interviews. We see incorrect tense usage, pronoun usuage and references that make little sense and sometimes its even unclear whether MT understands the question or when she refers to the body of JD being in EE passenger seat it appears that she is simply saying what she believes LE wants her to say based on what was being said. The AW says directed and probing was used to get anything out of MT so my guess is that things might have gotten tense as LE saw how things were going with the interview. IDK. But based on the AW it seems like the interviews were far from productive. Could things have been managed differently to get a better result or was this just a very determined MT who was going to do or die and follow the alibi scripts at all costs? IDK, but the AW question responses from MT certainly seem odd IMO.

Sorry if I was unclear about the language issue.

I am bringing up the language issue as a question or possible explanation for why the responses from MT simply seem oddly 'off'. Did MT fully understand the questions being asked or her?

Neither MT nor her atty so far as what is mentioned in the arrest warrant brought up the entire issue of what language the interrogation should be made in.

Perhaps Spanish would have been a more productive way to interview MT?

My guess is that is someone is determined to lie that it doesn't matter which language they are interviewed in!

If the Alibi Scripts are written in English that would be a clue that MT is fluent, I'm thinking.

She would have had to answer to the affirmative that she understood her Miranda rights which I'm just guessing were in English.

I'm more inclined to think MT was stoned/high than that she "no abla ingles".

Thinking further.....how does she run that rug business up there without English-speaking skills?

MOO
 
Last edited:
  • #1,347
Absolutely. She knows everything, and lied her 🤬🤬🤬 off over those interviews.

I hope she pays a price for that, and for her involvement.

MT also had Bowman there guiding her conversation with LE.

Perhaps he corrected the way she said that about "evidence".

He also would have been able to intervene if she was struggling to understand the questions.
 
  • #1,348
OMG ! Thank you for doing all this but I am so glad you weren't injured with what sounds like dangerous driving with the 2 uhauls and the 2 speeding cars.

What you describe sounds like an unusual situation with 2 huge Uhaul and the racing Suburban and white SUV. Your instincts have been spot on with everything you have reported so if you felt what you saw could be relevant to the case I would strongly suggest giving some thought to calling NCPD:

In addition to the tip line, 203-594-3544, to further gather information regarding Jennifer’s disappearance there is now a dedicated e-mail [email protected] and website www.FindJenniferDulos.com

A bunch of folks worked together to get the info you wanted on the Suburbans and I posted a picture of the white SUV with GA plates that was being driven by MT Mamma at the last arrest event. It looked like a Nissan with alot of silver trim.

Be safe and thanks a million for the picture it certainly looks overgrown. I wonder if what you saw was MT finally picking up her belongings from 4Jx with the 2 trailers? Wouldn't that be wild? But if the Suburban were involved then that would be a violation of the no contact order?

PS. With all the 'adventures' you have I hope you have a dash cam?!? Every time we talk about Albany the image of you in that neighborhood pops up in my head and it hard not to worry about your safety! Be safe and take care always please!!!

I wouldn't expect MT to have two large trucks full of her own possessions there.

Wanta' bet lots of items bought with Jennifer's money just blew down that road?

I suppose any scintilla of evidence has long been in the hands of LE. Let us hope.

Thinking a bit here, I feel sure LE has MT in their sites all the time so they couldn't have been far away.

MOO

Edited to say: Maybe she just robbed FD blind! Cargo shorts....gone. Glove....gone. Skis? I'm getting happier by the minute!
 
Last edited:
  • #1,349
Somebody sent me a link to Gray Hughes chat (long one) on the FD latest arrest. Haven't listened to it but wanted to share it in case others hadn't seen it post:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
  • #1,350
Hey, this intel isn't going to last much longer as I'm movin' on out immenintly. Better enjoy it while you can, haha :)
Please be careful and let us know when you get to Cali.
You have enhanced our lives, TKF.
I pray that life is way better wherever you land.
 
  • #1,351
Please be careful and let us know when you get to Cali.
You have enhanced our lives, TKF.
I pray that life is way better wherever you land.
@thekirbyfamily glad you are doing what is best for your and your family and that you will still be with us here on WS and that the note on your id gets changed from 'stuck in CT' to maybe 'happy in xx'! Be well!
 
  • #1,352
I think you’re missing an important paragraph (#16) in the arrest warrant.
It was on 6/6 (5 days after FD/MT arrest) that LE took the red Tacoma, and on that day while LE was securing his truck, EE ADVISED to LE at that time that the seats were different than the ones that were in the truck in 5/24;EE offered the seats to LE, and LE took them and entered them into evidence separately.
So EE did not hold onto the seats for a month, he volunteered that info to LE and gave them the seats within 5 days of FD arrest. Remember though, that the contents of the arrest warrant weren’t revealed until the arraignment which was that Monday the 3rd, thats when the general public learned of the Albany Ave run and of the bloody bag evidence for arresting FD and MT. So thats even less than 5 days.

According to EEs attorney interview, EE was shocked to learn that his truck had been in NC on the 24th, and EE had thought that FD was innocent until FD was arrested. (Likely because EE had heard the alibi script practiced by FD and MT as EE reported- as did we at the time, trying to figure out which lawyer his morning meeting was with, etc.
Knowing all that we know now, it’s hard to go back and remember the limited insight we had that first couple of weeks after JDs disappearance.

He switched out the seats on 5/31, kept the seats in his possession, and didn’t tell LE about the switcheroo or that he had the seats until 6/6 when they were in the process of securing the truck on a warrant. So over a month he had the seats and didn’t say anything. Just facts. Read #16 and #17 again. It’s confusing but it’s there.
 
  • #1,353
He switched out the seats on 5/31, kept the seats in his possession, and didn’t tell LE about the switcheroo or that he had the seats until 6/6 when they were in the process of securing the truck on a warrant. So over a month he had the seats and didn’t say anything. Just facts. Read #16 and #17 again. It’s confusing but it’s there.
BBM

Huh?
 
Last edited:
  • #1,354
IMO---MT and FD went to Bowman office together for a little heart to heart. But the bill was paid by MT (b/c her family had the money to put in her account so that she could cut the check) which would make Bowman MT attorney.....not FD attorney. She paid...got Bowman not FD (who had no money, obviously).

Ole Bowman read right thur FD and was quick to realize MT just isn't ---well, "very quick thinking" to pull off a murder. Oh and there's "ITS ALWAYS THE HUSBAND" thing in the back of his head ----and told her to stop talking to him.

Who pays the bill, usually does not dictate who’s attorney it will be. The attorney client relationship has many facets. Paying is not the criteria. It’s way more complicated than payment. Money paid could lead to more ethics issues now for Bowman. IMOO.
 
  • #1,355
He switched out the seats on 5/31, kept the seats in his possession, and didn’t tell LE about the switcheroo or that he had the seats until 6/6 when they were in the process of securing the truck on a warrant. So over a month he had the seats and didn’t say anything. Just facts. Read #16 and #17 again. It’s confusing but it’s there.
You’re right it is confusing.
How do you figure that from 5/31 to 6/6 is a month?
 
  • #1,356
You’re right it is confusing.
How do you figure that from 5/31 to 6/6 is a month?
You’re right it’s not a month. It isn’t that long. Oops.
 
  • #1,357
  • #1,358
No-they’ll probably be called to testify like that woman in Jodi Arias’s trial, who claimed JA showed all the signs of DV at the hands of Travis. I don’t think either of them will amend.
They won’t amend for sure. And I HIGHLY doubt that FD saw them 20 times. More like 2. I have seen these evals in CT the client goes about twice. There is NO way the psychiatrist saw him 20 times. That’s just NP blowing steam . What likely happened is that they went to see family therapists . CT sends all divorces with children to see family therapists, usually weekly , There’s a whole segment called family relations . The goal is “in the best interest of the children.” They have everyone going to therapy
 
  • #1,359
What about the “purse drop-off”?
Wondering that myself. When did FD catch up with her? He didn’t take his phone so he couldn’t call her to meet him at 80 MS. She just “happened” to be there ? I’m not buying that. I think she knew that was the day and he had her stay behind with his phone and when he arrived they continued the plan
 
  • #1,360
So well said and absolutely correct about CT IMO. I didn't do as well as you explaining it earlier this evening and people jumped on me a bit for saying EE would have been terrified and the financial issues were huge as well. I remember ages ago trying to find an atty for a small matter and it took 3 weeks because nobody would take less than $15,000 retainer. It was pure craziness IMO. So glad EE found someone that understands his situation and I am sure will take excellent care of EE and his family as Pattisville will come out guns blazing. MOO
Ok people, CT is NO different than any other states in this regard . The have have not difference as you put it , is the country at large NOT just CT. Getting kind of tired of reading things about this state that are not true .
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
115
Guests online
3,574
Total visitors
3,689

Forum statistics

Threads
632,667
Messages
18,630,016
Members
243,241
Latest member
Kieiru
Back
Top