Silver Alert CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #29

[HopeForTheBest]

That is very interesting about inheritance not being exempt from distribution in CT-in NY, where I live, I hear that a divorce cannot split up your inheritance. So maybe FD was waiting impatiently for GF to die, and she wouldn’t accommodate him, and so he did the next best thing by killing Jennifer. No wonder GF had armed guards!

Does that mean only if they commingled it, like put inherited money in a shared account and then used it to buy things and take vacations, etc.? (Things that aren’t easily tracked like buying a house.) Not my area at all and I don’t live in CT but I looked it up for a relative once. MOO.

 

[enelram]

Who would do such a thing???(lol)

Where's our resident reporter of all things fraudulent? Morgan 10028? afitzy? Jmoose?
who am I missing?
Come on guys, it has to be someone familiar
w/ FD's income stream or lack thereof, plus
wouldn't it be a HOOT if we got Justice for
Jennifer by getting IRS on his tail and he ends
up doing time for it.???
I hear things in the Hartford IRS Office are a
little slow right now.

 

[HopeForTheBest]

I think you are probably right about Jennifer or an attorney bringing up the subject of tax evasion, and that it may have been the catalyst for her murder. However, there isn’t anything stopping the IRS now, and his lack of cooperation, so helpful in the divorce action, cannot save him now. You can’t just tell the IRS to go pound sand when they make a demand for whatever it is that they need or want-wealthier and more powerful people than FD have attempted this route, and found that it wasn’t going to work the way they thought it would. When is this guy going to go to jail for the stuff we wouldn’t even hope to get away with? Seriously, who is protecting this creep?

I know this is a basic question but is it possible to take FD/MT to trial now for tampering, tax evasion, etc. and then LATER when more evidence is found or MT decides to make a deal after living in prison for a while, charge FD for that then? Not double jeopardy since it’s not the same crime, right? And there’s no time limit on murder charges, right? I know it’s been discussed many times but I don’t know where and when last. MOO.

 

[hivee]

When is this guy going to go to jail for the stuff we wouldn’t even hope to get away with? Seriously, who is protecting this creep?

That's my question!

 

[HopeForTheBest]

Where's our resident reporter of all things fraudulent? Morgan 10028? afitzy? Jmoose?
who am I missing?
Come on guys, it has to be someone familiar
w/ FD's income stream or lack thereof, plus
wouldn't it be a HOOT if we got Justice for
Jennifer by getting IRS on his tail and he ends
up doing time for it.???
I hear things in the Hartford IRS Office are a
little slow right now.

Every time I’ve ever called the IRS just to ask questions, they have been so helpful and so efficient. Perhaps they will drive the next karma bus toward Justice for Jennifer. I can’t see them putting up with the three-ring circus of drama created by FD/NP/MT. MOO.

 

[enelram]

Every time I’ve ever called the IRS just to ask questions, they have been so helpful and so efficient. Perhaps they will drive the next karma bus toward Justice for Jennifer. I can’t see them putting up with the three-ring circus of drama created by FD/NP/MT. MOO.

Wasn't there a time when a 'snitch' got a percentage of whatever IRS found wasn't reported or paid? Don't know if that's still in effect.

 

[BellaVita]

Does that mean only if they commingled it, like put inherited money in a shared account and then used it to buy things and take vacations, etc.? (Things that aren’t easily tracked like buying a house.) Not my area at all and I don’t live in CT but I looked it up for a relative once. MOO.

Nope. Even if not commingled.
Inheritance Laws for Married People in Connecticut
"Unlike other equitable distribution states, Connecticut law permits the court to divide both marital property and separate property."
It doesn't HAVE to be divided 50/50 but it sounds like CT is much more willing to divide an inheritance than most states. At least some percentage. As always, in equitable distribution, 50/50 is not always equitable as determined by the courts. JMO>

 

[Twistinginthewind]

And we don't know the stipulations of the trust and how they may be or have been passed along offspring.

I think FD has had his mind on JD's family's incredible wealth from Day 1 (when he 'bumped into her' at the airport, swept her off her feet, married her within less than a year, and proceeded to have 5 children within 5 years with her). JD's family has millions and millions of dollars (her dad ran a bank / brokerage firm, and her mom is a doctor and the niece of a legendary clothing business owner). JD is one of two children, and her sister does not have any children.

So all the wealth in the Farber family will eventually trickle down to Jennifer and her children, and her sister. FD was counting on that eventuality, and may have gotten impatient and worried he was going to lose control of that wealth when JD left him and filed for divorce after he started an affair with MT and proposed she move in with them with her daughter. MOO.

 

[Jmoose]

Does that mean only if they commingled it, like put inherited money in a shared account and then used it to buy things and take vacations, etc.? (Things that aren’t easily tracked like buying a house.) Not my area at all and I don’t live in CT but I looked it up for a relative once. MOO.

I am not sure how it works; I know a couple who live in NY, each of whom have inherited money from their respective parents, and when I said something about their inheritances being fair game for each other, I was told “not in New York”. But the wife inherited hers several years ago, and he got his after they decided to split. Hers might have already been spent by the two of them...if it is co-mingled and being used for, say payment of a mortgage for which they are both responsible, I am not sure what happens. In Ct, I guess it’s all fair game!

 

[Jmoose]

I think FD has had his mind on JD's family's incredible wealth from Day 1 (when he 'bumped into her' at the airport, swept her off her feet, married her within less than a year, and proceeded to have 5 children within 5 years with her). JD's family has millions and millions of dollars (her dad ran a bank / brokerage firm, and her mom is a doctor and the niece of a legendary clothing business owner). JD is one of two children, and her sister does not have any children.

So all the wealth in the Farber family will eventually trickle down to Jennifer and her children, and her sister. FD was counting on that eventuality, and may have gotten impatient and worried he was going to lose control of that wealth when JD left him and filed for divorce after he started an affair with MT and proposed she move in with them with her daughter. MOO.

Wouldn’t you think, with that much money on the line, that he could have kept it in his pants? Is any sidepiece really, really worth it? Could MT possibly be that compelling for someone who is as shallow as FD appears to be?

 

[BellaVita]

I am not sure how it works; I know a couple who live in NY, each of whom have inherited money from their respective parents, and when I said something about their inheritances being fair game for each other, I was told “not in New York”. But the wife inherited hers several years ago, and he got his after they decided to split. Hers might have already been spent by the two of them...if it is co-mingled and being used for, say payment of a mortgage for which they are both responsible, I am not sure what happens. In Ct, I guess it’s all fair game!

In Florida, for example, if it's not commingled, there can't be any division. There's even been case law where the court will still consider it separate, even after commingling, like if the parties split up shortly after the inheritance. Even though it can't be split per se, it can be a determining factor in amount of alimony awarded or division of other assets. Like if someone has been a stay at home wife with limited job skills, a court can determine that because of the spouse's increased ability to pay due to the inheritance, alimony could be higher than it ordinarily would be. To make things equitable. Based on research, unfortunately.

 

[pernickety]

Yes, IMO this ruling was one of the more confusing things I have tried to unravel in the Civil Case so far. The original Atty. P. motion to quash made reference to both the deposition and the requested information and the Jud

The court granted NP’s motion to quash, even though NP didn’t even have the right to file a motion in the Farber civil case, since he didn’t file an appearance, and was subpoenaed as a non-party witness-- IMO after reading Practice Book Rule 13-28. Procedure is that the subpoenaed witness who objects to it sends his/her objection by certified or registered mail to the counsel who issued it (Weinstein). Then counsel (RW) files a motion to compel, the clerk schedules it for a hearing. Then after parties are heard if the judge grants the motion to compel and orders the witness to comply with the subpoena and he/she doesn’t do so, the court can issue a bench warrant for arrest of the witness. PB Rule 13-3 states if a privilege is asserted, a privilege log identifying the documents withheld shall be provided. The Complex Litigation Docket clerk is supposed to inform the judge of pertinent court rules. Let’s see how RW’s motion for reconsideration goes. MOO

 

[Tink56]

I think FD has had his mind on JD's family's incredible wealth from Day 1 (when he 'bumped into her' at the airport, swept her off her feet, married her within less than a year, and proceeded to have 5 children within 5 years with her). JD's family has millions and millions of dollars (her dad ran a bank / brokerage firm, and her mom is a doctor and the niece of a legendary clothing business owner). JD is one of two children, and her sister does not have any children.

So all the wealth in the Farber family will eventually trickle down to Jennifer and her children, and her sister. FD was counting on that eventuality, and may have gotten impatient and worried he was going to lose control of that wealth when JD left him and filed for divorce after he started an affair with MT and proposed she move in with them with her daughter. MOO.

And, FD certainly wouldn't have wanted her to move to NYC, as he seemed to think she was planning to do....I wonder if that might have had an impact on the divorce at any point. In a divorce action with children, wouldn't the judge need to approve an out-of-state move by either spouse?

Just thinking aloud....however, if JD were to die or disappear before they divorced, there would be no worries about inheritance, eh?

 

[Sillybilly]

ADMIN NOTE:

We have been more than patient ... Zero Tolerance is in effect for name calling / name changes.

Why bother with immature name calling if you want your post, your opinion to be taken seriously? Members can type a post that's a page long, but if it contains name calling of any of the case players, the whole post gets removed because we've warned about this at least twice before.

Posts containing name changes have been removed, along with any responses if the name change appears in the quote. Sorry if the thread seems a bit disjointed as a result, but we don't have time to extend the courtesy of editing umpteen posts just because a few members continue to ignore our warnings.

 

[Midwestmom2019]

Yes, but I'm not sure that the trade aren't being used AGAINST Atty Weinstein in this case and in effect are no different from the 'friend' loans on the various properties. We shall see once the case goes to trial. The baffling thing about the trade is that FD/FORE had a couple of trade liens over the years but nothing like the situation at Sturbridge. IMO FD/FORE could have run out of money doing Sturbridge but one part of me says Nope that this is yet another FD/FORE game to make sure GF gets zero from any sale of Sturbridge. IDK, all conjecture on my part so we will have to wait for trial. MOO

Those “friend” loans better have a money trail showing that FD was in fact given the proceeds. As in a check. Wire transfer. Then where was the check deposited. If into a financial institution, follow the money. Where did it go? Mr. Markowitz probably has that information.
Oh? FD just kept cashing checks? Or reimbursing himself for business expenses he paid out of personal funds?????? Where did he get the personal funds to begin with? Did he get an allowance from JFD?
Ok. Keep following the money trail. If it turns into cash? Then how much? I’ll bet that it was in a briefcase and unloaded along with him in some foreign country. He was gone 10 days a month.
Makes me wonder if going to Miami made it easier to funnel to accounts overseas. Or flown out with his former friend/neighbor with private airstrip and plane. If so, that pilot is sweating bullets. Hoping beyond all hope he doesn’t get pulled into this mess. Aiding and abetting money laundering/ theft if in fact he knew or should have known what FD was doing.
FD must be charming in person. I believe sociopaths are charming as a group. He talked his way into so many people’s lives. By the time most of these people realized what was happening to them, it might have been too late to save themselves.
Possible 500 years for one lawyer.
MT? Ultimate sacrifice.
Wonder if FD got to Gaston Begue?

 

[hivee]

The court granted NP’s motion to quash, even though NP didn’t even have the right to file a motion in the Farber civil case, since he didn’t file an appearance, and was subpoenaed as a non-party witness-- IMO after reading Practice Book Rule 13-28. Procedure is that the subpoenaed witness who objects to it sends his/her objection by certified or registered mail to the counsel who issued it (Weinstein). Then counsel (RW) files a motion to compel, the clerk schedules it for a hearing. Then after parties are heard if the judge grants the motion to compel and orders the witness to comply with the subpoena and he/she doesn’t do so, the court can issue a bench warrant for arrest of the witness. PB Rule 13-3 states if a privilege is asserted, a privilege log identifying the documents withheld shall be provided. The Complex Litigation Docket clerk is supposed to inform the judge of pertinent court rules. Let’s see how RW’s motion for reconsideration goes. MOO

So is NP following court rules? Is CT lax on its court rules?
Ex: He didn't file an appearance...

 

[Morgan10028]

FORECLOSURE SUIT UPDATE: 10.16.19

Weinstein Wednesday DROPPING BOMBS ON FD...MOO

"After months of paying the mortgage for FD and his girlfriend to live in this palatial house, the estate of Hilliard Farber and Gloria Farber were compelled to pay off the bank in exchange for assignment of the mortgage."

AMENDED COMPLAINT 109.00
The Plaintiff seeks:

1. A foreclosure of the Mortgage Deed
2. Immediate possession of the mortgaged premises
3. A deficiency judgement against FD
4. The appointment of a receiver to collect rents and profits accruing from the property
5. Reasonable attorney's fees and costs
6. Such other relief as the courts deem equitable and proper

http://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentInquiry/DocumentInquiry.aspx?DocumentNo=17947294
109.00 Amended Complaint

 

[BellaVita]

Wouldn’t you think, with that much money on the line, that he could have kept it in his pants? Is any sidepiece really, really worth it? Could MT possibly be that compelling for someone who is as shallow as FD appears to be?

No. The Narcopath always believes he deserves and is entitled to better than what he's already got. When you look at JD and MT, you have to wonder about their definition of "better". And don't forget, there were others before MT. And I bet during, too. They can't be content very long. No matter how good they've got it. They are Destroyers of everything they touch, leaving behind brokenness and devastation.

 

[hivee]

Sorry if this is a dumb question, but why would FD want to transfer money to Greece? To support family? Someone this selfish wouldn't care.

 

[dlharris2712]

Wouldn’t you think, with that much money on the line, that he could have kept it in his pants? Is any sidepiece really, really worth it? Could MT possibly be that compelling for someone who is as shallow as FD appears to be?