Silver Alert CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #31

[afitzy]

It looks like they’ve installed cameras on much of the main line stations all the Darien, Westport and Norwalk stations, but probably not yet on the branch lines, many of which are as you say just platforms more or less.

New Canaan main station (downtown NC) has an old style renovated station so I do wonder if there are cameras there? Will have to check it out.

 

[pernickety]

@Twistinginthewind, from your mouth to GOD/or divine being of your choosing's ear!

I just looked again and Atty Weinstein filed to compel compliance with open discovery items in 30 days but we haven't seen an order to mandate this by Judge Noble that I see. Not sure why it has been radio silence from the Judge in Civil Court as there are any number of pending motions to resolve I think. I keep hoping for a final judgment to simply show up one day as a one line order from Judge Noble but I don't think it will happen unfortunately! We also haven't seen Atty. P. respond to the Judge Noble order either after Atty Weinstein filed a motion for the Judge to reconsider. So, Atty. P. is still in the deposition mix possibly as it would be great to figure out the Greek Benefactor situation once and for all and see where all this money is coming from to support FD five or six attys.
MOO

Interview: Attorney Norm Pattis answers questions about Dulos case

Here's the interview NP gave to WFSB early in the case. (I couldn't find it for awhile online, but then it showed up again). After the 1 minute mark just after he says, "Mr. Green is in the house", he says, "If he wants to pay more we'll gladly accept it." Sure would like to see his retainer agreement with FD.

 

[sds71]

state v Dulos
courant brief
http://appellateinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentDisplayer.aspx?AppId=2&DocId=8U8NUfdnOuhcFELmNNGRNg==

pattis brief
http://appellateinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentDisplayer.aspx?AppId=2&DocId=lqAhny/4Z2wbayRpdbojjg==

http://appellateinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentDisplayer.aspx?AppId=2&DocId=UR60vTB6HYb7T12eLfEQZQ==

 

[Jmoose]

state v Dulos
courant brief
http://appellateinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentDisplayer.aspx?AppId=2&DocId=8U8NUfdnOuhcFELmNNGRNg==

pattis brief
http://appellateinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentDisplayer.aspx?AppId=2&DocId=lqAhny/4Z2wbayRpdbojjg==

http://appellateinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentDisplayer.aspx?AppId=2&DocId=UR60vTB6HYb7T12eLfEQZQ==

He (NP) has some flippin’ nerve calling some social media free speech “scurrilous”! If anyone is engaging in scurrilous free speech, it’s that crew!

What are the odds that the gag order will be overturned? I am thinking “no”

 

[sds71]

He (NP) has some flippin’ nerve calling some social media free speech “scurrilous”! If anyone is engaging in scurrilous free speech, it’s that crew!
What are the odds that the gag order will be overturned? I am thinking “no”

I hope not

 

[sds71]

farber v. Fore group
135.00 11/01/2019 P MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE

 

[Outforjustice]

There is, without a doubt, video of him going through the woods behind JDs house.

Which must be how LE knows FD was
“Lying in wait”...

 

[afitzy]

He (NP) has some flippin’ nerve calling some social media free speech “scurrilous”! If anyone is engaging in scurrilous free speech, it’s that crew!

What are the odds that the gag order will be overturned? I am thinking “no”

Wonder if that social media reference is to WS folks with a very strict TOS? Kinda curious about this?!?!?

Absolutely love it (not) when other peoples opinions and views aren't covered by Atty. P. strong support of the 1st Amendment and are considered 'scurrilous' ([REDACTED] Great Word BTW)! I would be hard pressed to find a larger group of people with a grasp of the facts in this case than the folks present on this thread.

If Atty. P. is using 'scurrilous' to refer to WS and other folks following the case then I'm not sure which word to choose to refer to his now nearly 5 month largely irresponsible crusade to shame and blame a missing (presumed dead) JF who is not here to defend herself? Perhaps [REDACTED] [REDACTED]?

IMO Atty. P. victim shame/blame game as a primary defence of FD is IMO [REDACTED] [REDACTED]! Not one peep from Atty. P. regarding the FD/MT trip down Albany Avenue or anything about AW2 AM TRIP TO NC or about his client in general and disclosure of zero witnesses or CCTV as to FD location on JF Missing Date? Wonder why?

Me thinks that the 'truth' or 'facts' have zero to do with reality in 'Pattisville'!

Yep, MOO

 

[Jmoose]

I wonder if this is FD-it does say selling because of move...

 

[kimch33kim]

I wish that poster was correct and there is video of him doing that but unsure how poster can be so sure there is video of that.

Anyways, newest stuff FD and MT both spending huge bucks to scrub internet searches. If you know what I mean.

 

[kimch33kim]

View attachment 212734 I wonder if this is FD-it does say selling because of move...

No that aint FD

 

[Jmoose]

I wish that poster was correct and there is video of him doing that but unsure how poster can be so sure there is video of that.

Anyways, newest stuff FD and MT both spending huge bucks to scrub internet searches. If you know what I mean.

Speculation, or...reliable on-the-street info? I mean, if it was me, I would scrub any internet info about me, too

 

[afitzy]

state v Dulos
courant brief
http://appellateinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentDisplayer.aspx?AppId=2&DocId=8U8NUfdnOuhcFELmNNGRNg==

pattis brief
http://appellateinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentDisplayer.aspx?AppId=2&DocId=lqAhny/4Z2wbayRpdbojjg==

http://appellateinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentDisplayer.aspx?AppId=2&DocId=UR60vTB6HYb7T12eLfEQZQ==

Thanks for posting these documents.

Just had 2 min to read Atty. P. response and will give it a full read this weekend and of course respond with yet more questions.

But a few 'curious statements aka as possible 'whoppers'' jumped out at me in just a quick 2 min read. Curious what others think about this statement by Atty. P.

Atty. P. says, "There is simply nothing in the discovery provided to the defence to date that supports an inference that Mr. Dulos even knew his wife was missing at the time he allegedly disposed of items."

Very curious as to what Atty. P. thought FD and MT were doing on Albany Avenue disposing of items with JF blood on them as this is the closest Atty. P. has come that I'm aware of to discussion of this event. I actually read this sentence from Atty. P. 2x to make sure I read it correctly. IMO Mr. Dulos might not have known his wife was missing because she wasn't missing, she was dead and it didn't take a call from NCPD IMO to make Mr. Dulos aware of this particular fact which Atty. P. conveniently doesn't address.

The information about when FD was informed of JF's disappearance is also quite interesting as this has been an open question of many here but I will wait for LE or courtroom evidence confirmation of this particular statement by Atty. P. But frankly IMO the phone call from NCPD was irrelevant to FD knowing the 'status' of his wife, FD knew the status of JF IMO a/o around 8:20 am on the 24th and needed no phone call from LE to alert him.

MOO

 

[kimch33kim]

Speculation, or...reliable on-the-street info? I mean, if it was me, I would scrub any internet info about me, too

No speculation just do a search on their names and see the search results and how it differs from before. I search them every day along with many others here so that's how I noticed.

 

[sds71]

Thanks for posting these documents.

Just had 2 min to read Atty. P. response and will give it a full read this weekend and of course respond with yet more questions.

But a few 'curious statements aka as possible 'whoppers'' jumped out at me in just a quick 2 min read. Curious what others think about this statement by Atty. P.

View attachment 212736

Atty. P. says, "There is simply nothing in the discovery provided to the defence to date that supports an inference that Mr. Dulos even knew his wife was missing at the time he allegedly disposed of items." Very curious as to what Atty. P. thought FD and MT were doing on Albany Avenue as this is the closest Atty. P. has come that I'm aware of to discussion of this event.

The information about when FD was informed of his wife's disappearance is also quite interesting as this has been an open question of many here but I will wait for LE or courtroom evidence confirmation of this particular statement by Atty. P.
MOO

I took it to mean
he can't be charged with tampering because they haven't provided proof a crime

 

[Jmoose]

Thanks for posting these documents.

Just had 2 min to read Atty. P. response and will give it a full read this weekend and of course respond with yet more questions.

But a few 'curious statements aka as possible 'whoppers'' jumped out at me in just a quick 2 min read. Curious what others think about this statement by Atty. P.

View attachment 212736

Atty. P. says, "There is simply nothing in the discovery provided to the defence to date that supports an inference that Mr. Dulos even knew his wife was missing at the time he allegedly disposed of items." Very curious as to what Atty. P. thought FD and MT were doing on Albany Avenue as this is the closest Atty. P. has come that I'm aware of to discussion of this event. I actually read this 2x to make sure I read it correctly. IMO Mr. Dulos might not have known his wife was missing because she wasn't missing, she was dead and it didn't take a call from NCPD IMO to make Mr. Dulos aware of this fact.

The information about when FD was informed of his wife's disappearance is also quite interesting as this has been an open question of many here but I will wait for LE or courtroom evidence confirmation of this particular statement by Atty. P. But frankly IMO the phone call from NCPD was irrelevant to FD knowing the 'status' of his wife.

MOO

Wow-Since he was delivering evidence with his wife’s blood all over it to Albany Ave, why would any intelligent person think he would need to be notified that she was “missing”? The person depositing her bloody clothing would have been the first to know!

 

[afitzy]

I agree. So far have a list of 10 'questions' to Atty. P. as to what he was thinking about and that is with now spending 5 min on the document. Will go back this weekend and look for more. Its quite curious to me whether Atty. P. is counting on the Judges reading his document to perhaps not read Judge Blawies document or take a very quick look at the 2 technicolor AWs? Some of these statements with just a quick look are beyond stunning IMO.

MOO

 

[afitzy]

I took it to mean
he can't be charged with tampering because they haven't provided proof a crime

Yes, I agree with you that was his original idea but IMO the logic on the rest of the paragraph is perhaps faulty given the information presented by LE in AW2 which was most likely in the discovery packet along with the Hartford PD CCTV from Albany.

Atty. P. seems to be implying that there is no reason for Mr. Dulos to be aware of anything other than the fact that JD is alive and well when he and MT are disposing of bloody items on Albany.

Will go back and spend more than 5 mins reading this long document this weekend. It just surprised me that Atty. P. is putting forward the idea it seems that innocent people leave their neighbourhood to dispose of bloody items on a holiday weekend and that all of this was done by FD and MT with zero awareness as to the 'status' of JD. MOO

 

[MDATCA]

Yes, I agree with you that was his original idea but IMO the logic on the rest of the paragraph is perhaps faulty given the information presented by LE in AW2 which was most likely in the discovery packet along with the Hartford PD CCTV from Albany.

Atty. P. seems to be implying that there is no reason for Mr. Dulos to be aware of anything other than the fact that JD is alive and well when he and MT are disposing of bloody items on Albany.

Will go back and spend more than 5 mins reading this long document this weekend. It just surprised me that Atty. P. is putting forward the idea it seems that innocent people leave their neighbourhood to dispose of bloody items on a holiday weekend and that all of this was done by FD and MT with zero awareness as to the 'status' of JD. MOO

IDK about anyone else but if I were to come across a bunch of bloody items anywhere let alone at my STBX garage I call LE. I do not call my live in lover and set up a date to dump the stuff in the ghetto before going home to shower together. IDK maybe that is the norm in Atty P world but it is not in mine.

 

[Jmoose]

No speculation just do a search on their names and see the search results and how it differs from before. I search them every day along with many others here so that's how I noticed.

Thanks