Silver Alert CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #32

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #541
Good point. The only reason to cremate her, it appears, was to avoid further scrutiny.

Scrutiny about what? Toxicology...? perhaps she did not die from being run over as expected, and it needed to be finished off in the hospital - who knows?

I always had a nagging, bad feeling about the nanny (who ran his mother over) being the one who stayed with her that night in the hospital. I have images in my head of a pillow being put over FDs mother's face. I had this image/vision flash in my head months ago when I first read this story about FDs mother. MOO (and imagination) of course.
 
  • #542
Jennifer Dulos disappearance: Bill Cosby’s former lawyer to testify in civil trial

A high-profile New York attorney who represented fallen comedian Bill Cosby will testify in the $2.5 million civil lawsuits filed against Fotis Dulos.
Attorney John P. Schmitt, best known for defending Cosby in sexual assault lawsuits, was an executor of Hilliard Farber’s estate. Schmitt is expected to provide information on the financial transactions that occurred between Farber and his son-in-law, according to court documents.
The lawsuits filed by Gloria Farber on behalf of the estate of her late husband go to trial Tuesday before a judge in Hartford. Farber filed the lawsuits claiming Fotis Dulos owes her family more than $2.5 million in loans about 18 months before her daughter Jennifer Dulos disappeared.
The trial is expected to last two to three days. Hartford Superior Court Judge Cesar Noble will have at least a few months to render a decision in the lawsuits.
 
  • #543
JD might have kept the name to avoid confusion since her cousins wife is now Jennifer R. Farber.
Good point...at one point in my married life - there were three Debbie Harris'. Two of my husband's cousins also married a Debbie. It was confusing at times - but I was always (and still am the first and the original "Debbie Harris"). lol! not MOO - truth.
 
  • #544
Here's the thing that's not being discussed. The [rabid] elephant in the room, or whatever idiom one would like to use:

There shouldn't need to be a gag order at all.

Why not? Because any normal LOVING father would not be discussing this case with the media; he would not be espousing conspiracy theories about his wife abandoning the kids (for ANY reason - health or otherwise). He would know how harmful and painful that would be for his children to read about.

A father who cared about his children would not be making up lies about his wife's mental health or drug use, would never allow his lawyers to do so, and would certainly not be speaking about it to the press so that his children could hear of it.

Even if he no longer loved his wife, alive or dead, he'd never rip her image apart in public, nor would he allow his lawyers to do so.

However, this man does not care about his children's wellbeing, so there needs to be a gag order, to protect the children.

Fotis Dulos couldn't bother to pay child support or health insurance though he was flying around living the high life with his girlfriend. He continues to live off the money that should go to his children, meanwhile rapidly depleting the source of funds that provides for them, rather than tell the truth - all the while spouting horrid lies about his wife having abandoned the children. Imagine the psychological damage that could do to a child.

His lawyers clearly don't care about the wellbeing of the children, either. It's appalling, and while it speaks volumes about his hatred for her, it says much more about his lack of caring about the children - fitting, for a man who would take the life of the person they needed and loved most.
ABSO-FRIGGIN-LUTELY - excellent post!!! I agree 10,000% moo
 
  • #545
I always had a nagging, bad feeling about the nanny (who ran his mother over) being the one who stayed with her that night in the hospital. I have images in my head of a pillow being put over FDs mother's face. I had this image/vision flash in my head months ago when I first read this story about FDs mother. MOO (and imagination) of course.
Same here about the nagging feeling - and it would have been all too easy.

Who else spoke Greek at that hospital (which they chose for some odd reason, as it was not the closest one)? Who knows what the grandmother was saying?... yet they put the Greek-speaking nanny in with her overnight.

FD's mother was well-off in Greece so his saying she didn't have assets was a flat-out lie.

And let's not forget that the grandmother happened to fall down the stairs just 8 weeks before that, requiring stitches, breaking her arm, and sustaining other injuries. Not a minor incident. There was no explanation as to how she happened to fall; it would be helpful to know more about that, as well.
 
Last edited:
  • #546
Same here about the nagging feeling - and it would have been all too easy.

Who else spoke Greek at that hospital (which they chose for some odd reason as it was not the closest one)? Who knows what the grandmother was saying... but they put the nanny in with her overnight.

And let's not forget that the grandmother happened to fall down the stairs just 8 weeks before that, requiring stitches, breaking her arm, and sustaining other injuries. Not a minor incident. There was no explanation as to how she happened to fall; it would be helpful to know more about that, as well.

And the fact that FD was conveniently out of the country when this occurred. Too convenient if you ask me. MOO
 
  • #547
262.00 12/02/2019 P BRIEF
Document.gif
newred.gif
93 pages
PLAINTIFF'S PRETRIAL BRIEF
http://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentInquiry/DocumentInquiry.aspx?DocumentNo=18241391
Nanny’s (L.A.) Depo is in here
 
Last edited:
  • #548
Disappearance of Jennifer Farber Dulos will hang over civil trial pitting her mother against her estranged husband
The trial before Judge Cesar Noble would decide whether Dulos owes the estate of Hillard Farber, Farber Dulos’ father who died in 2016, about $2.54 million.

Attorney Richard Weinstein, who is representing Gloria Farber, Farber Dulos’ mother, will argue that loans made to Dulos’ home building company between 2004 and 2016 must be paid back to the estate while attorney William Murray, who is representing Dulos, will argue he owes nothing because the money from his then-father-in-law were gifts to help him with his business.

Dulos has been arrested twice in connection with his wife’s disappearance. He faces charges of tampering with evidence and hindering prosecution. He is free on a combined $1 million bond.
Dulos’ criminal defense attorney, Norm Pattis, said he will be present at the trial to ensure that Weinstein doesn’t ask his client questions about the disappearance of Farber Dulos.
 
Last edited:
  • #549
  • #550
I love Atty. Weinstein!!!!!

JMHO YMMV

upload_2019-12-2_17-37-2.jpeg
 
  • #551
262.00 12/02/2019 P BRIEF
Document.gif
newred.gif
93 pages
PLAINTIFF'S PRETRIAL BRIEF
http://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentInquiry/DocumentInquiry.aspx?DocumentNo=18241391
Nanny’s (L.A.) Depo is in here
I cannot believe the Gall of FD .
The majority of questions that Murray posed to the Nanny were outrageous, highly personal with the majority having nothing to do with the Civil case .

Murray wanted to know Where she lived,
what kind of car she drove, name of bodyguards, ethnicity of bodyguard etc etc ..

Like FD’s measly ankle bracelet would ever protect Her from his wrath.
 
  • #552
  • #553
Attorney Murray...WOW...just WOW! He is as smarmy as his client and his clients "company". Ick! moo...
I bet NP wrote those questions
I wonder where he was going with the car questions
 
  • #554
I bet NP wrote those questions
I wonder where he was going with the car questions
To make her feel like he might follow her -- to make her feel unsafe? That's his style.
 
  • #555
  • #556
  • #557
Forgive my ignorance, but what is a prejudgment remedy? Does this mean GF will accept $230,000, and not go to trial over the rest of it?

Not sure if this clarifies much, but here you go! :):
The Connecticut statute allows a plaintiff in a civil action to obtain security for the claim, in the form of an attachment, garnishment and/or replevin, at any time before final judgment, if the court finds “there is probable cause that a judgment in the amount of the prejudgment remedy sought, or in an amount greater than the amount of the prejudgment remedy sought, taking into account any defenses, counterclaims or set-offs, will be rendered in the matter in favor of the plaintiff."

PJR applications are commonly accompanied by the plaintiff’s statutory motion for disclosure of assets. If the court finds probable cause, and if the plaintiff does not already know of Connecticut assets against which the consequent PJR may be enforced, the court usually requires the defendant to disclose Connecticut assets sufficient to secure the probable cause amount.
- https://www.shipmangoodwin.com/file...81ab-1065b0858818/ct_prejudgment_11122003.pdf

CT law:
“Prejudgment remedy” means any remedy or combination of remedies that enables a person by way of attachment, foreign attachment, garnishment or replevin to deprive the defendant in a civil action of, or affect the use, possession or enjoyment by such defendant of, his property prior to final judgment but shall not include a temporary restraining order.
- https://www.cga.ct.gov/current/pub/chap_903a.htm
 
  • #558
  • #559
Not sure if this clarifies much, but here you go! :):
The Connecticut statute allows a plaintiff in a civil action to obtain security for the claim, in the form of an attachment, garnishment and/or replevin, at any time before final judgment, if the court finds “there is probable cause that a judgment in the amount of the prejudgment remedy sought, or in an amount greater than the amount of the prejudgment remedy sought, taking into account any defenses, counterclaims or set-offs, will be rendered in the matter in favor of the plaintiff."

PJR applications are commonly accompanied by the plaintiff’s statutory motion for disclosure of assets. If the court finds probable cause, and if the plaintiff does not already know of Connecticut assets against which the consequent PJR may be enforced, the court usually requires the defendant to disclose Connecticut assets sufficient to secure the probable cause amount.
- https://www.shipmangoodwin.com/file...81ab-1065b0858818/ct_prejudgment_11122003.pdf

CT law:
“Prejudgment remedy” means any remedy or combination of remedies that enables a person by way of attachment, foreign attachment, garnishment or replevin to deprive the defendant in a civil action of, or affect the use, possession or enjoyment by such defendant of, his property prior to final judgment but shall not include a temporary restraining order.
- https://www.cga.ct.gov/current/pub/chap_903a.htm
Drats , I still don’t understand ....... it.
 
  • #560
You've said it so very, very well. Kudos to you! Thank you for this post. I wish I could give it a thousand likes or more!
Awe! Thank you so much!!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
105
Guests online
2,200
Total visitors
2,305

Forum statistics

Threads
632,725
Messages
18,630,968
Members
243,274
Latest member
WickedGlow
Back
Top