Silver Alert CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #32

[sleuth66]

It was still her legal name, so it makes sense they'd use that. Plus it's how the MSM and public mostly knows her: as Dulos. So most people will know who they mean that way.

I personally like calling her JF (though I also have used JD or JFD) or Jennifer.

You can call her JD. Deal?

Actually her voter registration in NC (and before that Farmington) was (and still is) in the name Jennifer R Dulos (Jennifer Rebecca Dulos). So maybe JRD is another variation we could cast votes for.

 

[afitzy]

Jennifer Dulos case: Troconis wants to pick up daughter at JFK airport

Feel sorry for the child, but just sick of MT “asking” for things.

Three words to suggest to the Judge for this request: UBER and motion denied.

Why give special consideration to MT? Why not simply send Mama A to the airport?

Only in a case associated with FD and MT would a motion reference 'compliance with the terms of release' as a 'positive' and 'reason' for granting the motion and not take compliance as a given because its the law. Nope, not MT and FD, compliance with the law never seems to be 'given' and so we are supposed to believe that MT is a 'model citizen' for simply complying with the generous terms of her release?

Absolute BS IMO.

Hartford Airport is International so simply FLY TO HARTFORD.

 

[afitzy]

Jennifer Dulos case: Troconis wants to pick up daughter at JFK airport

Feel sorry for the child, but just sick of MT “asking” for things.

Three words to suggest to the Judge for this request: UBER and motion denied.

Why give special consideration to MT? Why not simply send Mama A to the airport or someone else?

MT represents a flight risk so why put her in a location where she could easily flee and never be found? Would the Mama A bail bond support being held in CT matter to MT or her daughter when MT is looking at up to 20 years in CT prison depending on future charges? Probably not.

Is the next request from Atty Bowman on behalf of his client that the "East Coast skiing isn't up to par so MT, Mama A and her daughter request permission to spend the Christmas holiday's in Vail?". Ridiculous also IMO and the sense of entitlement here is simply beyond belief too.

Only in a case associated with FD and MT would a motion reference 'compliance with the terms of release' as a 'positive' and 'reason' for granting the motion and not take compliance as a given because its the law.

Nope, not MT and FD, compliance with the law never seems to be 'given' and so we are supposed to believe that MT is a 'model citizen' for simply complying with the generous terms of her release and then reward her for compliance?

MT IMO should be made aware of the fact that she is privileged to have freedom of movement and that there is 'zero entitlement' to changing or making exceptions to her terms of release.

My guess is if the general population of CT were polled as to where MT belongs vs sipping lattes in Avon and selling animal skin rugs, the answer would be incarcerated.

Absolute BS IMO from Atty Bowman but totally on par after the wholesale invocation of the 5th by MT in Civil Court which IMO was yet another example of wasting court time and resources (but did most likely represent an excellent billing opportunity clock burner for trips to Hartford, multiple motions and a return trip to Hartford for yet another deposition - kind of a billing trifecta when you think about it).

Hartford Airport is International so simply FLY TO HARTFORD. BTW in case you missed it in your searches, the airlines would be Continental, American and Delta to Hartford from BA.

Why should the citizens of CT have to pay for Judges time and a hearing/motion because MT either can't figure out how to get her daughter from Argentina to Hartford OR because she simply doesn't want to pay the difference in cost?

Absolute waste of Court time and resources IMO and honestly to get special requests from people that IMO should be appreciative of having any level of personal freedom is getting to be quite tiresome.

LOL! I can think of a few names that begin with FD!

Good one!

 

[afitzy]

He’s made things far worse than they might have been—in MOO. I wonder when or if people will realize that saying something is so doesn’t mean it is especially in this world of information that can be checked. I’ve got to ask: If a possible buyer learned about this, would he or she trust anything else that was said by the seller? MOO.

Absolutely agree!

Mr. Karp IMO made a bad situation worse for himself and simply appears to be everyones worst perception of the sleazy real estate developer who will do anything for a sale. I feel for his situation with the house but to try and play 'hide the ball' on the address simply seems wrong IMO.

MOO

 

[afitzy]

She did not drop Dulos because the Divorce was not final yet, and until then, she is legally Dulos. You can't just change your name overnight, even if she wanted to do so, Before the Divorce was final. She could have, but it would be easier after the divorce.

In addition, she was the mother of 5 children with the name. I bet she wanted them to all feel some continuity, with them all having the same last name.

The family and Carrie have added Farber to her official name and I think, that is fitting.

If everyone wants to begin using JFD, I would not be opposed.

I began using JF, because to FD, JF was just a meal ticket and I did not want to associate the beautiful JF with this [REDACTED].

IMO.

100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

 

[afitzy]

I wouldn't even go so far as to put the "lack of spark" in the marriage on her - not that you are doing so, but society tends to blame the 'undersexed wife.' While she mentioned she was tired - since he was gone a lot of the time, leaving her to deal with 5 kids on her own for extended periods, even with nannies - he was not an equal partner at all.

In her Patch writings, she mentions that they got away on their own a few times when he was back. Here's how romantic he was:

They went to a movie: It was an action flick he chose, that she did NOT want to see. Romantic?:

"This past Sunday we saw (not my choice) Marvel's The Avengers. ... It was awful, less for Robert Downey Jr. ... Movies used to mean so much to me." - Jennifer Dulos, May 24, 2012 1:49 pm ET​

They went away another time for the weekend. She was looking forward to the peacefulness of it, just the two of them. But he binged-watched Game of Thrones the whole weekend, one after another. He bought them at the airport before even boarding the plane (making them late):

"Fotis is spending all his lovely time watching the first (and only) ten episodes of Game of Thrones on his computer. He bought it at the airport, while we were late to board. Not my fault! They were calling our names and so I parted from him and just got on the plane. He says that if they have your luggage on the flight they wait. ... So here he now is, watching episode 6, or 7?"
- Jennifer Dulos, Mar 20, 2012 12:56 pm ET ​

Had forgotten these FD 'vignettes' by JF so thanks for bringing them back into the discussion as they are so enlightening and relevant IMO.

entitlement
noun

en·ti·tle·ment | \ in-ˈtī-tᵊl-mənt , en-\
Definition of entitlement


1a: the state or condition of being entitled : RIGHT
b: a right to benefits specified especially by law or contract
2: belief that one is deserving of or entitled to certain privileges
3: a government program providing benefits to members of a specified group also : funds supporting or distributed by such a program

I'll never forget listening to a pilot at JFK dealing with a similar situation during a tight gate turnaround time on an international flight. Pilot IMO was a total hero when he told the crew to 'lock the doors' and radio the gate that the, "[REDACTED hole] can pick up his bag in Hong Kong as we are late with a full plane]. I asked the Pilot about the situation when he came out during the flight and he said he was embarrassed that we heard the conversation but that the person involved was well known to him on the route and had done the same thing twice before over the past month and that he was flaunting the rules and routinely checks an empty bag for just this purpose thinking it will hold the flight.

 

[Jmoose]

Jennifer Dulos case: Troconis wants to pick up daughter at JFK airport

Feel sorry for the child, but just sick of MT “asking” for things.

At least now we know that MT’s kid now lives in Argentina

 

[sds71]

At least now we know that MT’s kid now lives in Argentina

hopefully she'll just be in CT for two weeks, go to Vail
then back to Argentina when the break is over

 

[sds71]

SC 20363 STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. FOTIS DULOS ( GAG ORDER)

PROSECUTER:
http://appellateinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentDisplayer.aspx?AppId=2&DocId=3goiEH7ZvTH49zPgMAYPOA==

http://appellateinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentDisplayer.aspx?AppId=2&DocId=MPJpjqiosNKi6sTCB7RDKg==

 

[SkylarSid]

@Curious in CT, totally with you on all these questions regarding what exactly happened to poor Mama Dulos. Reading through the long long list of medicals issues Mama Dulos was dealing with it truly looked like the script from the tragic comedy, "Throw Mama From the Train"! I'm sorry to make light of the hugely tragic situation but it sounds like the medical history of Mama Dulos should have been investigated or possibly referred to LE for investigation when she was admitted via the Emergency Room. I would have thought that her intake evaluation would have raised any number of red flags at UCONN Hospital and given its proximity to 585 Deer Cliff I agree with the other poster who questioned the decision to go to St Francis Hospital. What drove the decision to go to St Francis Hospital? Did St Francis Hospital have full access to the UCONN Hospital records and history of Mama Dulos?

Head wounds are medically challenging to treat and the idea that Mama Dulos was having dizzy spells so long after her initial 'accident' is concerning IMO. I continue though to focus on the statements of FD that his mother had 'no assets' when that issue wasn't relevant to her medical history which just reading about it and not knowing anything about her is quite concerning as she seemed to have been on a downward health spiral.

Just take a quick look at the distances involved between UCONN Hospital and St Francis and 585 Deercliff, Avon, CT:

Google Maps

MOO

And she was cremated too, wasn't she? A toxicology report would have been interesting IMO!

 

[sds71]

BRIDGEPORT -- The case of missing New Canaan mother, Jennifer Dulos, has garnered national attention, but local photographer Doug Healey, has been there from the very beginning, capturing every step throughout the intense investigation.
“The first person I saw walking in the hallway, she looked at it and started walking away quickly and I wanted to say hello and she said ‘I know her’ and I couldn't say any other words, I didn’t want to cause she didn’t want to look anymore,” Healey said.
The exhibit is on display at the American Fabrics Arts Building in Bridgeport and the response has been strong.

Bridgeport photographer captures Dulos case

 

[CTGrammy]

Jennifer Dulos case: Troconis wants to pick up daughter at JFK airport

Feel sorry for the child, but just sick of MT “asking” for things.

MT wants to walk into a huge International Airport and the State's Attorney has no problem with this?

Does this indicate that MT wants to Walk through Security and meet her daughter at the Gate?

Where is MamaA and why is she not going to meet her granddaughter?

Perhaps MT should have thought about this Before her involvement in the disappearance of JF?

What's going to happen when MT Absconds with her fake passport or one of many legal passports. Just because MT handed over her passport to the court, does not indicate that she handed over ALL of her passports.

Seriously???

IMO.

 

[Mimi in London]

Jennifer Dulos case: Troconis wants to pick up daughter at JFK airport

Feel sorry for the child, but just sick of MT “asking” for things.

Entitled. Astounding. But, that aside.

The Royal Family and the Trumps often co-ordinate the colours they wear, within a certain palette, when they know they will be photographed as a family. Guess what! The Troconises do the same! See photos 1 and 12!

They’ll be in Hello! magazine next!

 

[sds71]

Entitled. Astounding. But, that aside.

The Royal Family and the Trumps often co-ordinate the colours they wear, within a certain palette, when they know they will be photographed as a family. Guess what! The Troconises do the same! See photos 1 and 12!
They’ll be in Hello! magazine next!

If she had an A@@ she’d try to get a contract with
No Excuses Jeans

 

[sleuth66]

SC 20363 STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. FOTIS DULOS ( GAG ORDER)

PROSECUTER:
http://appellateinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentDisplayer.aspx?AppId=2&DocId=3goiEH7ZvTH49zPgMAYPOA==

http://appellateinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentDisplayer.aspx?AppId=2&DocId=MPJpjqiosNKi6sTCB7RDKg==

Footnote 2 on page 3 has a great summary of NPs lies:

“2 For instance, a New York Post article dated June 22, 2019 quoted defense counsel, Attorney Norm Pattis, as follows: (1) the defendant's wife "had a 'troubled past' and 'struggled with heroin her whole life'"; (2) the defendant's wife '"had a relationship with a person who would import heroin from Cambodia' prior to dating" the defendant; (3) the defendant's wife "once disappeared from New York and 'lived for years under a false name' after an 'intrafamilial dispute about money'"; (4) the defendant's wife "had 'severe psychiatric
problems,' was on anti-depressants, and 'a custody study was prepared to give [the defendant] unsupervised access to the children"; and (5) the defendant "received a $14,000 bill in April for unknown blood work [his wife] had done." Def.'s Appendix, p. A128. Additionally, in a WFSB article dated June 14, 2019, defense counsel was quoted as follows: "'My understanding is that [codefendant Michelle Troconis] has taken a polygraph exam and the question of whether she had any knowledge of any foul play or disposal of evidence, and she satisfied police in that polygraph exam, and she provided an alibi. .. .'" Id., A142. During the hearing, the state disputed the accuracy of defense counsel's statements regarding a polygraph. T. 8/9/19, p. 19.”

 

[pernickety]

Simply NO WORDS for Mr. Karp, who is an active local developer who IMO should know better than to make such statements publicly about what he believes happened to JF. None.

Did Mr. Karp NOT read AW2 which specifically states that the "Body" of JF left 69 Welles/71 Welles in her Suburban which was driven per AW2 by FD. AW2 didn't say that JF left sitting in the passenger seat of her Suburban while chatting about what a beautiful day it was with the driver, FD. Nope. JF IMO based on what AW2 stated did not leave 69 Welles/71 Welles alive and she was allegedly killed at the house. AW2 was absolutely unambiguous about the status of JF leaving Welles so I'm not sure what Mr. Karp is basing his statement that, "...he doesn't believe she died there".

I feel for Mr. Karp as the owner of a property where someone was allegedly murdered, but I believe for him to make assumptions about what happened to JF that are absolutely CONTRARY to those made by LE in the AW2 is simply wrong, premature and IMO irresponsible at this time. Further, to make such statements to the Press about the property and what happened to JF IMO simply defies logic for the exact same reasons.

Selling a haunted or otherwise notorious house

Quotes from Article:

Homes with this unusual problem are known as "stigmatized properties." Marc Ben-Ezra and Asher Perlin, writing for the American Bar Association, say these properties are considered to have emotional or psychological defects rather than physical ones. In other words, the home itself is in good shape but a buyer might not be comfortable purchasing it due to its reputation.

Several states have adopted laws about stigmatized properties, though there are several different definitions for this designation.

Disclosures

Stigmatized properties are not limited to homes where the doors shut themselves and ghosts are glimpsed at the end of hallways. It is much more likely that a buyer will be uncomfortable to learn that someone has been murdered, committed suicide, or died in an accident at the home. Buyers may also be deterred by properties where serious crimes took place or where the previous occupant had an infectious disease.

Buyers are more likely to be concerned with these issues when they are fresh in memory, but some reputations can be especially persistent. For example, the homes featured in "The Amityville Horror" and "In Cold Blood" are still known as the scenes of notorious multiple murders.

In Connecticut, the issues that stigmatize a property are defined as nonmaterial. As such, a seller or their agent does not have to disclose them when putting a property on the market. These parties are also protected from any action a buyer might pursue against them for not disclosing an issue related to the home's past or supposedly haunted nature.

However, the law also recognizes that such issues may be important to the buyer. It provides that the buyer can make a written request that the seller disclose any information about whether the home was the site of a murder, suicide, or felony. The seller can refuse to provide this information, but must inform the buyer in writing.

2011 Connecticut Code
Title 20 Professional and Occupational Licensing, Certification, Title Protection and Registration. Examining Boards
Chapter 392 Real Estate Brokers and Salespersons
Sec. 20-329ee. Purchaser or lessee may request written disclosure of property's status re homicide, other felony or suicide.
Sec. 20-329ee. Purchaser or lessee may request written disclosure of property's status re homicide, other felony or suicide. Notwithstanding sections 20-329cc and 20-329dd, if a purchaser or lessee of real estate, who was in the process of making a bona fide offer, advises an owner of real estate or his or her agent, in writing, that knowledge that the property was at any time suspected to have been the site of a homicide, other felony or a suicide is important to the purchaser's decision to purchase or lease the property, the owner through his or her agent shall report any findings to the purchaser or lessee, in writing subject to and consistent with applicable laws of privacy. If the owner refuses to disclose such information, his or her agent shall so advise the purchaser or lessee in writing.

(P.A. 90-141, S. 3; P.A. 02-122, S. 2.)

History: P.A. 02-122 substituted reference to a homicide, other felony or a suicide for "psychological impact" and substituted "the purchaser's" for "his".

Connecticut General Statutes > Chapter 392 > § 20-329cc
Connecticut General Statutes 20-329cc – “Nonmaterial fact concerning real property” defined
Current as of: 2018 | Check for updates | Other versions


As used in sections 20-329cc to 20-329ff, inclusive, a “nonmaterial fact concerning real property” means a fact, set of facts or circumstance surrounding real estate which includes, but is not limited to: (1) The fact that an occupant of real property is or has been infected with a disease on the list of reportable diseases, emergency illnesses and health conditions issued by the Commissioner of Public Health pursuant to section 19a-2a; or (2) the fact that the property was at any time suspected to have been the site of a death or felony.

Terms Used In Connecticut General Statutes 20-329cc

• Felony: A crime carrying a penalty of more than a year in prison.
• Real property: Land, and all immovable fixtures erected on, growing on, or affixed to the land.

Stigmatized Property: Haunted Sales

Here’s a link to an article on “stigmatized property” published in Realtor Magazine back in 2003, written by a CT real estate agent. (Note the publisher disclaimer that the archived content might not express current laws) But it does express dilemmas faced by both sellers and RE agents in disclosing circumstances that aren’t considered material facts. About a decade ago when I was selling my own house in Ffld Cnty, the lawyer I used (one who was referred to me and whom I’d never refer to anyone else) handed me a contract to sign—a pre-printed document crafted by the legal bar. I noticed a clause that in effect said that seller (me) represented that the house had no history of anything that could be deemed to be a psychological impact. (Can’t remember the legalese). Knowing the law on it, I asked the lawyer why it was in there. “So let’s just cross it out,” he said limply. I had only owned that house a few years and knew the sellers I bought it from had rented it out for several years. How would I know what ever happened there in the past? (No signs of hauntings when I lived there.) Anyone selling, or buying, a house should carefully read the contract a lawyer gives them to sign.

 

[Tink56]

Jennifer Dulos case: Troconis wants to pick up daughter at JFK airport

Feel sorry for the child, but just sick of MT “asking” for things.

Maybe we should hope she has been "giving" to the State's Attorney in return for the favor....???? It is Thanksgiving...do we dare believe that there may be something in this case for our thanks?

 

[SkylarSid]

At least now we know that MT’s kid now lives in Argentina

That's a relief to know she has been with Papa.

 

[sds71]

Maybe we should hope she has been "giving" to the State's Attorney in return for the favor....????

in CT that could mean many different things

 

[kimch33kim]

in CT that could mean many different things

*insert laughing emoji*