Silver Alert CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #32

[CTGrammy]

That shoulder bag was de


Was wondering about what might have been in that very large bag over the shoulder myself. Any theories?

The charging unit to his Fancy Ankle Bracelet?

IMO.

 

[Tink56]

1. @davealtimari 2h2 hours ago
   Judge says they are going to break for the day at 4:15 so likely Dulos will be back on stand tomorrow for cross examination by Weinstein.
   
   
2. Dave Altimari‏ @davealtimari 2h2 hours ago
   Attorney Murray going through series of invoices for work Fore group did on Pound Ridge guest house that appear to show several of what Weinstein claimed were loans actually just payments to Fore group for work done at Pound ridge. Already laid out about half million in invoices.
   
   
   Reading Tweet 2, I just have to wonder at what point in his relationship with the Farber family did FD simply make the decision to not cooperate with anything having to do with JD or GF and the goal was to suck as much money out of the Farber and JD as possible? Seems like it all might have gone back to 2010 and the birth of the 5th child and certainly the point around the death of his FIL appeared pivotal too.
   
   Between the FD antics in Family Court that are so well documented to the mysterious 'invoices' that probably IMO were 'hot off the ink jet printer' or 'the photocopier at Staples', it has become painful on behalf of anyone that cared about JD or her children and Family to watch such abuse of the court system play out with FD. While we have no reason to believe the invoices are 'real', it is mind blowing that if someone was being sued for nonpayment of a debt that such items would have been submitted long long ago in this process. The discovery process for this suit has been long and gruelling for all involved so why not just protest the 'amount owed' up front when the initial claim was made? Its for this reason that I doubt whether the invoices are real as no doubt the books and records of the FIL estate have been gone through with a fine toothed comb looking to prove both the loans in existence and any repayment IMO.
   
   What is baffling though is that FD seems willing to set himself on 'fire' and torch his life down to the ground simply to prove an unknown point.
   

The Greek interview in which FD stated he "knew his marriage was over in 2010," has haunted me. (And, I've probably repeated it too many times...sorry folks!)

If HF stated that the rest of the money could be gifts for his grandchildren and the happiness of FD and JFD, I would understand that. HOWEVER, there is no way that HF, would have meant that FD alone was ever entitled to that money...EVER! FD is delusional, greedy, and probably some phrases that could get me banned.

Was it 3-4 months after HF died that FD declared to Jennifer that things were finally over. He refused marital counseling. Then, she had private investigators check on him and everything came crashing down in 2017. His mind had been made up as far back as 2010.

He didn't love MT enough to give up the money....he didn't love JFD enough to stay with her...but, he wanted the money, his morning showers, his skiing buddy, his party girl, who only has one child. FD is a horrible parent who so disrespected his relationship with the mother of the children that he couldn't end it with dignity for JFD. He humiliated her and expected her to do things his way. THAT is abuse, IMO...MOO He's not a man....he lacks the courage to behave in an honorable fashion.

 

[sds71]

That shoulder bag was de

Was wondering about what might have been in that very large bag over the shoulder myself. Any theories?

His ego

 

[Curious in CT]

Justice for Kleopatra Dulos ... Fotis Dulos’ mother died in freak driveway accident years before Connecticut wife Jennifer Dulos went missing

@Alathea, it touches my heart and gives me even more hope for this world to see how you and others here are so concerned about this little old lady from Greece you never met, the mother of FD, JD’s mother-in-law, a little old woman whose death was seemingly barely noticed by many at that time. I bow to you and the others here who look for justice for ALL. Bless you. Thank you. When I first heard about FD’s mom, I thought it was strange but I dismissed it as an accident because I couldn’t imagine another option. Now, with the “fresh eyes” you and others have put on this based on your review of the reported circumstances combined with the other pieces of this convoluted puzzle from the finances to the affairs to the alibi scripts and so much more, this situation looks like something LE needs to review again. I feel for LE as they have had to spend so much time and effort related to FD’s activities already but...that little old lady can’t, paraphrasing @afitzy’s quote, speak up for herself. Thank you! And, of course, MOO.

 

[Curious in CT]

Attorney Murray...WOW...just WOW! He is as smarmy as his client and his clients "company". Ick! moo...

Ick rhymes with [REDACTED].

 

[CTGrammy]

Do we know that FD deducted interest expense for the "loans" or is that speculation?

After HF died, FD demanded that his past accountant change the LOAN amount to equity, on the 2017 taxes.

When the past accountant refused, FD took his illegal business practices elsewhere.

However, ALL previous taxes filed, showed the amounts from HF as LOANS. Now that FD is claiming those VERY LOANS are Gifts, then FD OWES the IRS money for every year he claimed this money to be loans.

So, there is no point in claiming the Loans on the taxes if in fact he was not also claiming a deduction for the interest on said loans.

However, The Bigger Issue, is that he did Not Claim the 'Gifts' as INCOME on the Taxes and therefore did not pay INCOME Taxes on the monies received from HF.

There are differences in how 'Gifts' are treated in regards to filing them on your taxes. I personally am not familiar with all the nuances with a Gift, since I do not have a wealthy benefactor.

Regardless, FD OWES HF or FD OWES the IRS.

Bottom Line: FD PAID ON ALL THE LOANS until HF died. HOW can he Now claim that the Loans were actually Gifts? IF they were gifts, then WHY did he make all those payments toward the 'Gifts'?

FYI, these 'new' financial documents are FAKE, FAKE, and more FAKE. There is NO WAY that these actually existed, since FD would have used them against Dr. GF when she First sought Civil Action against him, more than 1.5 years ago.

IMO.

 

[Spider92]

After HF died, FD demanded that his past accountant change the LOAN amount to equity, on the 2017 taxes.


However, The Bigger Issue, is that he did Not Claim the 'Gifts' as INCOME on the Taxes and therefore did not pay INCOME Taxes on the monies received from HF.
IMO.

I don't know what FD reported and am certainly not here to defend him. I am, however, a certified (but not verified ) tax geek and can confirm that gifts received from relatives are not taxable income, regardless of the amounts.

 

[afitzy]

Thx so much for the update. It sounds like it went good for the plaintiff, except possible invoices that may prove some monies were used for a guest house for the F's.
I can imagine the jurors (there's jurors, right?) must think, "What a user"! He got monies from F's and a friend in Greek, and seemed to have no obligation (in his mind) to his family.
Let them take care of ME!

Yes, no jurors though. This trial gets decided by the Judge and IMO given what we have seen from this particular Judge (seems to be a relatively new and inexperienced Judge) could be a concern. We shall have to wait and see as its not all over yet.
MOO

 

[Myvice]

I wonder if FD would rather owe GF and his children money or spend time in the klink for filing fraudulent tax returns and perjury?

Tomorrow should be an interesting day.

 

[afitzy]

I feel as though we may need to create some new words for this. Tawdry, reprehensible, appalling—none of the words I can think of come close to describing this. MOO.

I'm down with immature, unacceptable and just plain disgusting to describe all this FD behaviour. IMO the more testimony we hear about FD, the more it appears that JD was a prisoner in a marriage to a 'petite prince tyrant'! It was mind blowing to me to see FD 'sister' whose name we don't know say to the Fox61 Reporter that, "FD is the nicest person I know...."! Perhaps she herself is surrounded by petty tyrants and monsters? IDK, just a continuing saga of the FD 'all about me and all the time' train. It and he IMO are totally foul in terms of how he treats people.

MOO

 

[Tink56]

His ego

Good point SDS71!

 

[afitzy]

The Greek interview in which FD stated he "knew his marriage was over in 2010," has haunted me. (And, I've probably repeated it too many times...sorry folks!)

If HF stated that the rest of the money could be gifts for his grandchildren and the happiness of FD and JFD, I would understand that. HOWEVER, there is no way that HF, would have meant that FD alone was ever entitled to that money...EVER! FD is delusional, greedy, and probably some phrases that could get me banned.

Was it 3-4 months after HF died that FD declared to Jennifer that things were finally over. He refused marital counseling. Then, she had private investigators check on him and everything came crashing down in 2017. His mind had been made up as far back as 2010.

He didn't love MT enough to give up the money....he didn't love JFD enough to stay with her...but, he wanted the money, his morning showers, his skiing buddy, his party girl, who only has one child. FD is a horrible parent who so disrespected his relationship with the mother of the children that he couldn't end it with dignity for JFD. He humiliated her and expected her to do things his way. THAT is abuse, IMO...MOO He's not a man....he lacks the courage to behave in an honorable fashion.

Yep, you NAILED it, FD has no [b[REDACTED]lls]! Immature, coward who IMO is consumed with greed and envy for wealth that he had no entitlement to.

But I do have to say that the ongoing commentary about LOVING his children is what is simply putting me over the edge as I have ZERO doubt that FD has no earthly clue as to what LOVING anyone (other than himself that is) might entail. But what also continues to stun me with this testimony is his immaturity and absence of ability to care about others and that in many respects seems like a case of arrested development as his decision making is low level, strictly focused on his wants/needs and childlike.

The contrast between his behaviour and his education is fascinating as his education seemed to have zero impact on his development as a human being IMO. I do very much wonder about the substance of his childhood, impact of relationship with his parents, whether his 'sisters' statement about raising him is true and whether he himself endured abuse of any kind as a child or experienced some trauma in childhood.

The 13 year age gap with his 'sister' meant that he was an only child as his sister was no doubt off away at school for most of his childhood IMO. We don't know when his sister left home and/or got married so its impossible to know the impact that she might have had on raising such a 'monster' as we see here with FD and his treatment of his children and total disrespect of his relationship with JD.

IDK, perhaps FD simply recreated the marriage that he saw his parents have for many years? Mistress, cheating, taking money from your spouse and taking zero responsibility for child care could just be the typical Greek male MO that he saw and so replicated in his own marriage? IDK, but the testimony in Family and now Civil court is pretty clear as to what FD did in terms of taking care of this family both in practical and financial terms and IMO he is pretty poor specimen as a human being, partner and certainly disastrous as a parent.

The MT affair (AKA the FO + HO show) happening since 2015 (we learned about this in court today) cinched the deal for me on all these questions about FD and I can see why Atty. P. put his head into his hands in Court today, as if anyone had any doubts about who/what FD was before today then the mask is well and truly off after today.

MOO

 

[afitzy]

I don't know what FD reported and am certainly not here to defend him. I am, however, a certified (but not verified ) tax geek and can confirm that gifts received from relatives are not taxable income, regardless of the amounts.

Interesting point. But my understanding is that during the discovery process in this trial that the books of Farber Estate and the Trusts were reviewed and all gifts disclosed.

IMO FD is simply 'claiming' a gift where no such gift was bestowed and Atty Weinstein has provided the books of the various Farber entities to prove this point.

We just have FD standing up and most likely yet again lying on the stand while under oath (he'd been there and done this many times before in Family Court and while being deposed in this Civil Case too IMO), saying that after 2010 things with his relationship with his FIL were 'different' after 2010 and the financial relationship wasn't as formal as it had been in the past.

Mmmm. IMO FIL was no legal or financial dope. Nope. Unfortunately dead men can't speak so we don't get to hear from FIL today except what he put in his will. The will did not state that upon his death all loans to FD/FORE were forgiven. NOPE, not there in the will.

So, who will you believe here and where would you place your money on a bet - FIL or FD? FIL and his will or FD with a long and well established track record of having a loose grasp on the truth and someone with huge financial incentive to not tell the truth now?

I know where my money would go on this bet!

MOO

 

[glassheater]

DBM

 

[Midwestmom2019]

I don't know what FD reported and am certainly not here to defend him. I am, however, a certified (but not verified ) tax geek and can confirm that gifts received from relatives are not taxable income, regardless of the amounts.

Sorry. But I believe you are wrong. Gift taxes are due after a certain amount. Last time I checked, it was $11,000 per recipient.

Added: but forgiveness of debt is a taxable event.

 

[afitzy]

Its a bit OT for the trial talk but the LA deposition was interesting IMO as FD/Atty BM seemed on a big fishing expedition on how the 5 Dulos children made it to NY from CT on 4/24/Missing Date.

Its an interesting question as FD/MT took the Suburban to Waveny so it wasn't available to LA to use and in her deposition she stated that she usually drove the Suburban.

So, if there weren't duplicate car seats in all the vehicles (this would be a lot of seats to have lying around IMO) or LA didn't have keys to the Range Rover or Porsche on 4/24 OR she didn't take the children to the city on the train or via car service, then she might have been forced to take them in her personal vehicle which appeared to be a Kia (believed to be a 5 person vehicle - 3 in back seat and 2 in front).

I found this info on child seats and restraints for CT (info from below link):

What are the Child Passenger Safety Laws in Connecticut?
LAW: Infants must remain rear-facing until they are a minimum of both 2 year and 30 pounds.

LAW: Toddlers must be in a forward facing car seat with 5 point harness until 5 years and 40 pounds.

LAW: Children should ride in a booster until they reach 8 years old AND 60 pounds (they must meet both requirements). Children who ride in a booster seat must use a lap and shoulder belt.

LAW: Children, tweens and teens must be in a seat belt whenever they ridein a vehicle.
Further Recommended: Children should ride in the back seat until they are 13 years old. All people and objects should be properly restrained whenever they are in a vehicle.

Violators of the Connecticut car seat law must pay a fine and attend a 2-hour educational car seat class at the Department of Motor Vehicles.

Safe Kids CT :: Child Passenger Safety


What I do find fascinating about these rules is that FD AND MT were in violation of these rules when they had 10 people in the famous drone shot of the group of them going/coming from ski day trip. This picture was used by FD as his FB photo and what is so hilarious about it is that it tells us yet again who/what FD and MT are all about. MT wasn't supposed to be with the 5 children (but she was in the picture and its been up on FB since 2018) and it looked like there were 10 people standing in that driveway who had gotten out of the Suburban (or we all about to pile into the Suburban). Its also unclear if all the ski gear fit in the car tote or whether it was inside the Suburban as well.

Looks like FD/MT if caught could have been subject to 'fine' and 2 hr. safety class. Not surprising in CT, zero happened.....

 

[glassheater]

Regarding the gift tax, perhaps this will help?

IP 9411 A Guide to Federal and Connecticut Gift Taxes

tax and accounting are definitely NOT my forte

 

[Myvice]

My money goes on two legal documents: FD's tax return showing a loan, and HF's will showing that all loans will go to the estate, over the word of a proven liar.

I just pray that records are available showing the contract and payment details on Pound Ridge. I would love to see FD escorted out the back door before the criminal case is even started.

 

[CTGrammy]

I don't know what FD reported and am certainly not here to defend him. I am, however, a certified (but not verified ) tax geek and can confirm that gifts received from relatives are not taxable income, regardless of the amounts.

However, according to H&R Block, there is a limit of $15,000 per recipient, per year for a gift.

There are also additional issues when a gift has been made to a Business as opposed to an Individual.

The $2.5+ Million is the issue here and although the receiver may not initially owe taxes on the gift, it does then cause an issue when the receiver has counted the 'gift' as a Loan for many years and then changes it to Equity. Now this is where it gets tricky, since the Loan has now been called a Loan on the Loan Documents, Equity on a Legal Tax Document, and a Gift on the Record in a Court of Law.

Again, this is not my forte, but I do know that someone owes money if in fact the $2.5+ Million was a Gift.

Usually, the Giver would file on their taxes that a Gift was made and if the amount is over $15,000 per person per year, then taxes are owed.

Not to mention any Fraud Charges that FD would face with his Fraudulent Tax Returns for all the years he claimed a Loan when it was a Gift.

In FD's case, this becomes an issue because he LIED, LIED, and LIED some more, when he had the Loan changed to Equity and when he testified today that the Loan was actually a Gift.

IF the Loans were gifts, then I am sure that HF, being the money man that he was, would have filed them as gifts and would have paid any taxes associated with the gift.

I would think that Attorney Weinstein and his investigations into the HF Estate would have found any mention of a Gift made to FD and/or his business.

IMO.

 

[CTGrammy]

Regarding the gift tax, perhaps this will help?

IP 9411 A Guide to Federal and Connecticut Gift Taxes

tax and accounting are definitely NOT my forte

Thanks for this. It brings more insight.

I also noticed the following statement that could put the payment of the taxes of the gift on the receiver, in the state of CT.

WHO MUST PAY THE TAX?

The person making the gift is responsible to file federal Form 709 and Form CT-709 and pay the taxes due (if any). If the gift taxes are not paid when due, the person receiving the gift may have to pay the tax.

IMO.