@BellaVita, I do think if a case can be made for the presence of criminal activity in any of these Fd/FORE transactions, then it would be possible to make a referral to the States Atty Colangelo. Danbury Savings Bank is simply going to do its best to get repaid on a mortgage that now looks to be underwater. But Danbury Savings Bank has zero interest in the larger picture of Fotis Dulos and FORE GROUP and Jennifer Dulos and marital assets.I could be wrong but I doubt it is CT issue to enforce. It is the responsibility, IMO, of the people/institutions who have been wronged. Again, JD atty Midler, so many issues before JD even went missing. What was he doing? The state doesn't help you. Your atty needs to advocate and you have to be proactive. If you have a judgment against someone, YOU are the one who needs to find the assets, their address, their place of employment. Nobody from the state is going to help you except for what is available in the public record. IME. IMO.
This sad case involves a missing person and I am truly shaking my head here as to who amongst all the highly paid legal folks or the State of Connecticut are charged with representing the legal interests of Jennifer Farber Dulos when it appears her husband has all the incentive in the world to take anything that might belong to her or be a shared with her in terms of assets and abscond with it all!
If Judge Heller or Atty Midler won't do it then perhaps Atty Weinstein (representing GF who has an interest in the Sturbridge Property) will undertake to refer the matters for criminal investigation. IMO something needs to be done as the assets of Fd/FORE are being depleted and we have no idea of any of the assets involved represent marital assets or perhaps trust assets of the 5 Dulos children?
I do think Fd/FORE is playing with a bit of 'fire' if mortgage fraud is what is happening here or on the other properties. In looking at the amounts involved for all the various Fd/FORE related parties it appears he might have 'cut things tight' and not left any room for the real estate market in New Canaan to continue to be terrible. I do wonder if the bank is left short whether they might just turn around and sue for fraud? IDK. There is already substantial evidence on the record in Family Court that Fd/FORE submitted different financial statements to the Court vs what was provided to Farmington Bank (now Peoples Bank of Bridgeport, CT) for purposes of obtaining loans.
We also have the situation of Sue Morin of Farmington Bank (now Peoples Bank of Bridgeport, CT) taking the 5th in her deposition in Family Court regarding the Hunter property I believe.
How much potentially fraudulent activity is necessary before some Judge or some Atty makes a referral to the State of Connecticut for investigation?
MOO
Last edited: