- Joined
- Mar 4, 2018
- Messages
- 29,591
- Reaction score
- 695,894
I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised if that happened.Maybe they make a decision about life support?
I think we’re talking about FD in the past tense by Friday.
I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised if that happened.Maybe they make a decision about life support?
Maybe it means the decision to keep him on life support is so the family can visit him before they pull the plug?Maybe without an arrest warrant in place, the law is afraid that the Greek family members could and might help FD escape to Greece? I'm also assuming that the law doesn't really care if the defendant is in zero shape to walk out of a hospital or not; and thinks better safe than sorry.
nothing really, but he may not possess the brainpower to accomplish this. If he is deemed
in a dangerous state he will be drugged into quiet submission.
Maybe it means the decision to keep him on life support is so the family can visit him before they pull the plug?
Who has the final decision?
I wonder if Fotis has a living will or if he has indicated that in such a situation he did not wish to be kept alive with life support?
Imo
No, I don't think it has anything to do with the family visiting.If I’m understating today correctly
He will be rearrested if he gets out of the hospital
this was done so his family could visit?
I don’t think it’s that complicated. I think it’s only a paperwork issue to place everything on hold. They all know he’s not going anywhere by now, at least not anytime soon. With him rearrested, they can have guards to keep lookieloos out but the family can still see him, the bond issue being revoked and a new bondsman essentially disappears because there’s no need for it at this time, it also cleans up any possible issue with him no longer being in CT or under house arrest. That’s why NP agreed so quickly. JMOMaybe without an arrest warrant in place, the law is afraid that the Greek family members could and might help FD escape to Greece? I'm also assuming that the law doesn't really care if the defendant is in zero shape to walk out of a hospital or not; and thinks better safe than sorry.
No, I don't think it has anything to do with the family visiting.
They are most likely coming to see him so they can say goodbye.
Imo
I agree and the scanner clip confirmed what we saw med tech doing on scene with regard to the CPR. The LE briefing only mentioned CO2 poisoning treatment but did refer generally to what was done to treat Fd at the scene.That part sounds like it was picked up over the scanner or radio.
Cardiac arrest means his heart stopped or at least they suspected that it had. The cpr was performed to get his heart going again or maintain a rhythm until paramedics or doctors could use more advance measures or a dr or ME call TOD. Had they not done that there would be no reason to treat the carbon monoxide
That’s the mystery question. IIRC, reports yesterday stated first responders performed extended CPR at the scene (along with reports of intubation.) No pulse etc.So how mostly dead is he? Is he expected to come out of whatever state he’s in? I can’t find details of his medical circumstances. Do they think he was not breathing and without heartbeat for quite a while?
Haldol plus 4 point restraint submission, I wonder?
Perhaps their need to know could be later. As much as I despise FD actions, he is their father. Allow them the courtesy of learning at their own speed. Too much has been foisted on them already.
FD just could not deal with prison. I think that was the insurmountable obstacle, more than the shame (and certainly there is zero evidence of remorse). Remember when he tore out of court in his orange jumpsuit, even though most go back to change? He didn't want to go back to jail for even five minutes. Now he saw the writing on the wall - he was going out through the back door today and so he did what he had to do to "win," took the escape hatch straight to the hell of his own making. A strange and dangerous man who could have had everything -- in fact, he did have everything. He really did. And he was somehow compelled to destroy it. For what?? Greed, rage, ego, arrogance, need to control, lack of empathy, or some sinister combination of all of the above? The whole thing is such a terrible shame. Now MT (and KM) will blame FD for everything, even if she was a willing co-conspirator and equally cold-hearted. How could she? But, how could she do so many of the things she did. You would think by age 45 you'd have a sense of female solidarity but she was ruthless in treading on an innocent woman, a fellow mom, and taking everything she could for herself. My heart breaks for Jennifer, and her precious children.
I think he was referring the waiving of extradition. I'm not 100% sure so any atty's please jump in and help here.Yes, which decision is he referring to?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.