Deceased/Not Found CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #44

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #821
I would imagine that getting her to commit to one story is a bit like nailing jello to the wall.
IMO, some real time behind bars may have gotten her to talk. Sadly, that bond made that impossible. If she's so uncomfortable in a small condo with that monitor on her ankle, prison life just may have broken her down. FD was so scared of prison that he offed himself. JMO
 
  • #822
I'm fairly new to this case also, but I found a lot of information, timelines, media reports etc on the media thread of this case. You'll find it as the first thread. Hopefully, that will answer some questions you have as to evidence. Also, the AW3 did charge FD with murder, so that was his last charge.

Thank you, WS! (Great initials!) Excellent post! It's always a pleasure to meet someone who has read up before posting. It shows real interest in the case.

They would not have charged Fd with murder UNLESS they had an extremely strong case, knowing there was no body. They're not into wasting CT taxpayer $$.

There's not only a ton of evidence in the AWs and SW, but a whole lot we don't yet know. The KB (Kelsey Berreth - here on WS) case is a good one to read up on if you want to know how this trial would have gone for Fd, and how it will most likely go for the other two (KM and MT).
 
  • #823
IMO, some real time behind bars may have gotten her to talk. Sadly, that bond made that impossible. If she's so uncomfortable in a small condo with that monitor on her ankle, prison life just may have broken her down. FD was so scared of prison that he offed himself. JMO

I agree; granting bail for two people who were clearly involved in a conspiracy to dispose of incriminating evidence of a murder they were part of, should have nullified a bail option. Also FD would still be alive probably if they had kept him in jail.
 
  • #824
MT new atty:
Attorney Jon L Schoenhorn & Associates, LLC

From website:
Criminal Defense:
Jon L Schoenhorn & Associates, LLC handles all aspects of criminal cases on an affordable and professional basis, including white collar investigations, from the investigative stage, through grand jury investigations, interviews with law enforcement officials and prosecutors, the arrest and bail process, pre-trial motions, then ultimately trial to verdict and (if unsuccessful) appeal. The firms' attorneys are experienced in all felony, misdemeanor, motor vehicle infractions, youthful offender and juvenile delinquency matters. We work with clients on probation and parole problems, grand jury investigations, extradition, petitions for new trial, sentence modification and habeas corpus. Possible grounds for constitutional challenges to arrests and motions to suppress for violations of individual rights are explored in every case.

Attorney Schoenhorn has never worked in law enforcement or as a prosecutor as a matter of choice and believes that the rights of individuals are paramount when the nearly limitless resources of the state or federal government are brought to bear on citizens.
What?! I'm behind in reading and I apologize for asking this if it has already been asked and answered, but since when did MT get a new attorney!? Thanks in advance.
 
  • #825
Motion to modify conditions of release
Sabina Kuriakose on Twitter
EQDMpvHWAAA9pTm
 
  • #826
This is Attorney Jon Schoenhorn who is now representing Michelle Troconis in her case on charges of conspiracy to commit murder, evidence tampering, and hindering prosecution. @News12CT spoke with him and will have more on what he had to say starting at 7.
EQCg1VeXkAAicZt


Gag order does not apply to him either?
 
  • #827
  • #828
@kimch33kim, do you know if MT has been papped doing these activities? If so, I would suggest sending them off to Judge Blawie or White and Atty Colangelo asap as I simply don't see them as being part of the original intention for someone with a murder charge levelled against them by the State.

My recollection of the bond restrictions were: house arrest except for legal, medical and religious. As MT doesn't work she didn't get the work restriction that Fd had (and later lost).

How do you think that Starbucks and Hair fit into the legal, medical, and religious categories?

I do very much wonder if the Parole folks understand what house arrest is supposed to be and what the restrictions are as I'm not seeing a pasta pickup and coffee break fitting into any of those categories?

Does anyone understand what the Parole folks might be thinking about here?

MOO
Prayer groups at Starbucks and the saloon?
@SabinaKuriakose
Schoenhorn says the conditions of Troconis's house arrest prevent her from being able to find a job, and alleges some aspects serve only to humiliate and punish her.
Oh! She wants to work as in a job where you go somewhere and clock in and perform a duty? Good for her!
 
  • #829
Oh brother...Maybe don't help plot to kill, or help kill, or move vehicles, or fake phone calls or lie to LE multiple times or clean up your boyfriends clearly murdered wife...and you won't have these problems..

Right-I’ve never been confined to my home, unable to travel to Argentina or Starbucks before-any of you guys? Of course, none of us have been charged with conspiracy in a murder case, along with hindering prosecution and tampering with evidence, either. There seems to be a correlation there, Bud.
 
  • #830
@SabinaKuriakose
Schoenhorn says the conditions of Troconis's house arrest prevent her from being able to find a job, and alleges some aspects serve only to humiliate and punish her.[/QUOTE]
It's simple, MT. Spill it. Depending on what you did and what you'll admit to, you may live to have a career and perhaps even another shady Starbucks date with a handsome, waterskiing sociopath. You can get a job in prison. You're a socialite, correct? Surely you'll make lots of new friends. Do something decent and wise for a change and talk. Do your time. Then you can go back to selling those hideous rain boots. JMO
 
  • #831
"She lives in a small condo."
Is that supposed to paint her sympathically?
Can her daughter visit her?

House arrest for a conspiracy/murder arrest seems fair and constitutional.

Apparently, her daughter can only visit her if she is allowed to pick her up herself, at the airport. She can’t visit if someone else does it.
 
  • #832
Apparently, her daughter can only visit her if she is allowed to pick her up herself, at the airport. She can’t visit if someone else does it.
I do believe MT requested permission to pick up her daughter from the airport before, and she was given it.
 
  • #833
I do believe MT requested permission to pick up her daughter from the airport before, and she was given it.
I remember that as well.
 
  • #834
@SabinaKuriakose
Schoenhorn says the conditions of Troconis's house arrest prevent her from being able to find a job, and alleges some aspects serve only to humiliate and punish her.
I feel as if we have entered the Twilight Zone of PURE ENTITLEMENT here.

All I can say is that MT is responsible for her own feelings and as a 45 year old woman should have these issues well under control (or so I should hope)! If she and her CT Court files tagged her for drug testing and psychological support then perhaps she doesn't have it all figured out yet and it was believed she needed support?

I do wonder reading all these posts from the media whether MT realises that she has been charged with Conspiracy to Commit Murder by the State of CT and other very serious crimes?

I do not hope we are going down the path of the next motion being for a psych exam to prove diminished capacity as if MT is worried about being 'humiliated and punished' for having the privilege of being out on bond then I'm really not sure what can be done to help her other then to be placed in the psych hospital for CT inmates.

Simply no more words for this as it seems absolutely out of touch given the circumstances. If these are the kinds of motions MT and Mama A feel entitled to then my strong guess is that Atty Bowman said, "good riddance to bad trash" as these ladies are simply delusional.

MOO
 
Last edited:
  • #835
Oh boy,
MT new counsel is starting off with a bang. Its discouraging to see immediate pandering to client whims so I'm not sure how this 'relationship' will work out. But, perhaps its a case of 'what Mama wants, Mama gets'! IDK.

MT doesn't like her bracelet and wants it removed. Really! Bracelet removal for Conspiracy to Commit Murder charge levelled against her? Yes, Really!

I do very much hope she faces Judge White here on this issue as I would actually buy a ticket to hear his response to the removal request. My guess is that it would be something along the lines of, '...if you want the bracelet removed the express van to Bridgeport Jail or Niantic is ready and waiting outside along with your pretty yellow jumpsuit so step into the locker room and change your clothes and I will see you for your next appearance wearing the yellow jumpsuit..and sorry no trip to Stamford Hospital on the way will be allowed!".

MT IMO is lucky to have the opportunity to NOT BE IN JAIL and so should be getting down on hands and knees daily to thank GOD that she has the financial wherewithal (still have doubts about her bond package for some reason.....) to be out pending trial.

From what it seems like is happening, the bracelet monitors are allowing leeway for takeout and shopping so does MT perhaps think that the US constitution requires that she be able to get a blowout and Brazilian too?

The priorities of MT and Mama A with these latest requests seem a bit odd as I would think that there are bigger issues at hand.

Disappointing to see this all play out this way.

MOO

I agree....and if the bracelet was removed...she would be gone in no time...fleeing real fast. IMO family already has the plans for this.
 
  • #836
What?! I'm behind in reading and I apologize for asking this if it has already been asked and answered, but since when did MT get a new attorney!? Thanks in advance.
@NWLady, Today! And she wants her bracelet removed because she feels she is being 'humiliated and punished'! She has also been pictured at Starbucks, picking up italian food and getting her hair done while her bail conditions are for house arrest and exclusions for legal, medical and religious.

PS. She now want to work! MT is 45 years old and has a spotty employment record but now has the hankering to do 9-5 job!

Nothing boring ever happens here!

MOO
 
  • #837
Motion to modify conditions of release
Sabina Kuriakose on Twitter
EQDMpvHWAAA9pTm
OMG I was only joking when I said he would use FD’s suicide note proclaiming MT’s innocence...but it is right there #12!

....and she has a sore on her ankle from the bracelet
 
  • #838
OMG I was only joking when I said he would use FD’s suicide note proclaiming MT’s innocence...but it is right there #12!
you should send him a bill!
 
  • #839
OMG I was only joking when I said he would use FD’s suicide note proclaiming MT’s innocence...but it is right there #12!
Pretty pathetic for MT to use FD's words about her to defend herself after they way he and NP tossed her under a Greyhound. I guess this "lying lover" has got a short memory. JMO
 
  • #840
The MT atty motions make for very entertaining reading (attached above by @sds71 in reporters tweet). MT was mandated to comply with periodic drug testing and the AIC program. This apparently is irking MT. Do very much wonder where this particular bond condition came from? Atty Colangelo perhaps? Fd so far as we know did NOT have this condition in his bond. Do wonder about the MT history with drugs or psychological instability or DV? This condition is not added for 'no reason' so Atty Colangelo had a reason.

I'm surprised her atty isn't suggesting that MT actually participate in AIC. Reading through the offerings and given what we saw happen to Fd, it could very well benefit MT in terms of acclimating to her situation and preparing for trial and possible eventual lifetime incarceration. Fd might have been helped IMO by AIC as it looks to be a very comprehensive range of services provided free to people in MTs situation. Surprised she is so anti such a progressive option!

One of the more entertaining comparisons in the motions was to say that MT 'only' has 1,000SF condo while Fd had a 15,000SF house and because her space is less then she deserves greater freedom of movement. The complaint about her daughter being out of State is also within her control too so far as I see it. Simply have her daughter come and enrolled in Avon Public Schools or go back to EW School? The idea that just because her daughter is enrolled in school out of state and should be accommodated in this situation simply makes little sense as its a controllable variable in her life.

Motion actually mentions going to get groceries, walking in the yard and getting her hair cut! Not making any of this up BTW! They are requesting the removal of ALL non financial requirements in the Bond and it appears AIC as well. I do wonder if MT failed her drug test when she was booked for AW1 and that is why she got AIC and Fd did not.

We did get confirmation in this motion that MT IS a US Citizen. So, there is something useful in terms of information there to make it worth reading.


Alternative Incarceration Center in Connecticut | AIC

Info on AIC:

Specifically, AIC offers anger management counseling, drug and alcohol counseling, drug and alcohol urine and hair follicle testing, mental health counseling, and job retraining programs. At your first court date for Connecticut domestic violence arrest, the court can order you to attend these programs or report for random testing as a condition of your release.

MOO
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
74
Guests online
3,314
Total visitors
3,388

Forum statistics

Threads
632,659
Messages
18,629,803
Members
243,238
Latest member
talu
Back
Top