Deceased/Not Found CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #50

[sds71]

@MarissaAlter
Superior Judge John Blawie has ended Michelle Troconis’ house arrest and curfew requirement. Blawie denied her request to remove her GPS anklet or allow her to travel outside Connecticut without court permission.
Pages1-10

 

[sds71]

@MarissaAlter
Superior Judge John Blawie has ended Michelle Troconis’ house arrest and curfew requirement. Blawie denied her request to remove her GPS anklet or allow her to travel outside Connecticut without court permission.
Pages 11-13

 

[Tink56]

Here's an excerpt of the NC Patch article on this, including a quoted email to Patch from John Williams, NP's counsel. This excerpt shows Pattis' attack on Mrs. Farber (through his mouthpiece Wms):

"Many lawyers and one judge worked very hard on crafting this settlement, which every sensible person familiar with the matter thinks is fair and reasonable for all concerned," Williams said in an email to Patch. "Ms. Farber, who has more money than any person ought to have and doesn't need or even want anymore, is pursuing this not on the merits but out of a twisted need to injure the lawyer who did his job by defending the son-in-law she hated."

Williams continued, "Attorney Weinstein, who undoubtedly is being paid very well for his activities, is simply her handmaiden. Neither he nor she even has standing to pursue their bogus claim because they are mere creditors of the Estate which is the only party with an interest in this matter. They are doing all of this anyway, despite its complete lack of merit, simply because Mrs. Farber's money allows them to do so. They are abusing the judicial system and ought to be sanctioned."
Jennifer Dulos' Mother Against Settling With Norm Pattis: Lawyer

Here's some background on Atty Williams from AVVO--lawyer ratings:

https://www.avvo.com/attorneys/06510-ct-john-williams-4597928.html

"This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority.

• 
  
  
  • Suspension issued in CT, 2017

updated on 11/28/2017

This means the attorney lost his or her license to practice law for a period of time. The attorney typically returns to practicing law when the suspension expires.

• 
  
  
  • Reprimand issued in CT, 2019

updated on 08/20/2019

A reprimand is an order from the Statewide Grievance Committee after it has found that an attorney has engaged in ethical misconduct. If an attorney receives more than 3 reprimands in 5 years, a presentment must be filed against the attorney so the Superior Court can decide if more serious discipline should be ordered

Here' to reprimand #3! Thanks for posting this.

Frankly, and this has bothered me for a long time, no one really knows GF's financial situation. Lots of people are making assumptions about her wealth with no factual basis as far as I can tell.

Although I'm certain that HF planned for the financial future of his wife, I'm not sure that he planned for the death of his daughter and the SBX son-in -law. I won't even wager a guess how much it will cost to provide for the 5 children through college and perhaps a start on life after college. Honestly, and I pray I'm wrong, GF needs to makes plans for someone else to step in and finish raising these children if needed...perhaps many someones. Whereas, HF may have planned for a reasonable inheritance for his daughters and a comfortable life for his wife, there is no promise that the estate will cover all the kids' future costs.

Publicly making this type of statement is crass, unwarranted, and evil. If NP allowed his "attorney" to make these comments, they both should be reprimanded.
(Edited: A few "weird" things happening when I quote someone.)

 

[Tink56]

@MarissaAlter
Superior Judge John Blawie has ended Michelle Troconis’ house arrest and curfew requirement. Blawie denied her request to remove her GPS anklet or allow her to travel outside Connecticut without court permission.
Pages 11-13

I can live with this. I certainly hope the Appellate Court sees the wisdom also.

And, as Joypath stated, there's always incarceration.

 

[Tink56]

@MarissaAlter
Superior Judge John Blawie has ended Michelle Troconis’ house arrest and curfew requirement. Blawie denied her request to remove her GPS anklet or allow her to travel outside Connecticut without court permission.
Pages 11-13

Thanks as usual for your excellent research skills!

I forgot to mention that I hope MT enjoyed her trip to Miami. I thought I saw some interesting comments on the Twitter feed that Judge Blawie confirms.

Poor, poor incarcerated MT....not.

 

[pernickety]

Here' to reprimand #3! Thanks for posting this.

Frankly, and this has bothered me for a long time, no one really knows GF's financial situation. Lots of people are making assumptions about her wealth with no factual basis as far as I can tell.

Although I'm certain that HF planned for the financial future of his wife, I'm not sure that he planned for the death of his daughter and the SBX son-in -law. I won't even wager a guess how much it will cost to provide for the 5 children through college and perhaps a start on life after college. Honestly, and I pray I'm wrong, GF needs to makes plans for someone else to step in and finish raising these children if needed...perhaps many someones. Whereas, HF may have planned for a reasonable inheritance for his daughters and a comfortable life for his wife, there is no promise that the estate will cover all the kids' future costs.

Publicly making this type of statement is crass, unwarranted, and evil. If NP allowed his "attorney" to make these comments, they both should be reprimanded.
(Edited: A few "weird" things happening when I quote someone.)

Violation of this RPC for JW's reprimand #3:

Rule 3.6. Trial Publicity(a) A lawyer who is participating or has participated in the investigation or litigation of a matter shall not make an extrajudicial statement that the lawyer knows or reasonably should know will be disseminated by means of public communication and will have a substantial likelihood of materially prejudicing an adjudicative proceeding in the matter.

 

[citygirl]

Here' to reprimand #3! Thanks for posting this.

Frankly, and this has bothered me for a long time, no one really knows GF's financial situation. Lots of people are making assumptions about her wealth with no factual basis as far as I can tell.

Although I'm certain that HF planned for the financial future of his wife, I'm not sure that he planned for the death of his daughter and the SBX son-in -law. I won't even wager a guess how much it will cost to provide for the 5 children through college and perhaps a start on life after college. Honestly, and I pray I'm wrong, GF needs to makes plans for someone else to step in and finish raising these children if needed...perhaps many someones. Whereas, HF may have planned for a reasonable inheritance for his daughters and a comfortable life for his wife, there is no promise that the estate will cover all the kids' future costs.

Publicly making this type of statement is crass, unwarranted, and evil. If NP allowed his "attorney" to make these comments, they both should be reprimanded.
(Edited: A few "weird" things happening when I quote someone.)

Mr. Green is in the house.
Just in time.
'Cause Mr. FD is in his garage.
MOO.

 

[citygirl]

Thanks as usual for your excellent research skills!

I forgot to mention that I hope MT enjoyed her trip to Miami. I thought I saw some interesting comments on the Twitter feed that Judge Blawie confirms.

Poor, poor incarcerated MT....not.

She went to Florida with her ankle monitor?
Lost here.

 

[joypath]

Thanks as usual for your excellent research skills!

I forgot to mention that I hope MT enjoyed her trip to Miami. I thought I saw some interesting comments on the Twitter feed that Judge Blawie confirms.

Poor, poor incarcerated MT....not.

"enjoyed her trip to Miami." "allow her to travel outside Connecticut without court permission."

Very important points of reference for "we, the people": travel must be preapproved, vetted and authorized inclusive of modes of travel and companion(s)/or contacts. My DH (retired Ct. Statie) indicated that great pleasure will be/has been taken in informing LEOs that there's a "high value" anklet with GPS (that they can also monitor, prn) in the jurisdiction. Major (or sometimes minor depending on the "perp") deviations from the approved itinerary/behaviors can result in retention & restraint of said individual!

She's NOT a "free spirit" by any definition! Leos are NOT thrilled with folks involved in orphaning young children, no matter what jurisdiction of residence!
all IMHO with "cheerleading words" from darling hubby!

 

[Tink56]

"enjoyed her trip to Miami." "allow her to travel outside Connecticut without court permission."

Very important points of reference for "we, the people": travel must be preapproved, vetted and authorized inclusive of modes of travel and companion(s)/or contacts. My DH (retired Ct. Statie) indicated that great pleasure will be/has been taken in informing LEOs that there's a "high value" anklet with GPS (that they can also monitor, prn) in the jurisdiction. Major (or sometimes minor depending on the "perp") deviations from the approved itinerary/behaviors can result in retention & restraint of said individual!

She's NOT a "free spirit" by any definition! Leos are NOT thrilled with folks involved in orphaning young children, no matter what jurisdiction of residence!
all IMHO with "cheerleading words" from darling hubby!

Judge Blawie did acknowledge the court approval for her recent Miami trip. Her crack attorney must have figured out how to ask the judge for things like this...

But, keep those cheers coming....and hopes that the Appellate Court supports Judge Blawie!

 

[Tink56]

She went to Florida with her ankle monitor?
Lost here.

With court approval...Not sure if she wore her jewelry.

 

[Tink56]

Violation of this RPC for JW's reprimand #3:

Rule 3.6. Trial Publicity(a) A lawyer who is participating or has participated in the investigation or litigation of a matter shall not make an extrajudicial statement that the lawyer knows or reasonably should know will be disseminated by means of public communication and will have a substantial likelihood of materially prejudicing an adjudicative proceeding in the matter.

Pernickety, I nominate you to the CT court rules committee! If only the courts would address these issues more quickly, if at all.

Bullies are bullies even if they have law degrees. (And, ugly, hateful people and speech do need to be filtered.)

 

[sds71]

Judge Blawie did acknowledge the court approval for her recent Miami trip. Her crack attorney must have figured out how to ask the judge for things like this...
!

Her crack attorney must have figured out how to ask the judge for things like this...

i thought FD had the crack attorney...
sorry misread the post, but here's an update on him.

Pre-Trial Next Court Date: 10/27/2020 10:00 AM
Current Charges
Statute Description Class Type Occ Offense Date Plea Verdict Finding
21a-279(b) NONSTDNT-DRGS NEAR SCH/DAY CR A Misdemeanor 1 10/31/2019
21a-277(b(2A* INTNT SEL/DSPNS NO NRC/HAL U Felony 1 10/31/2019
https://www.jud2.ct.gov/crdockets/C...ding&Key=9f3a9d1d-691e-4ff6-a790-077a6d3a0dac

 

[Jmoose]

@MarissaAlter
Superior Judge John Blawie has ended Michelle Troconis’ house arrest and curfew requirement. Blawie denied her request to remove her GPS anklet or allow her to travel outside Connecticut without court permission.
Pages 11-13

What the bleep is wrong with Judge Blawie??

 

[Jmoose]

Thanks as usual for your excellent research skills!

I forgot to mention that I hope MT enjoyed her trip to Miami. I thought I saw some interesting comments on the Twitter feed that Judge Blawie confirms.

Poor, poor incarcerated MT....not.

So basically, every time she requests permission to leave the state of CT, her request will be granted?

 

[Tink56]

So basically, every time she requests permission to leave the state of CT, her request will be granted?

Hmmm...the chances of traveling to Argentina are probably pretty slim...

 

[HopeForTheBest]

Here' to reprimand #3! Thanks for posting this.

Frankly, and this has bothered me for a long time, no one really knows GF's financial situation. Lots of people are making assumptions about her wealth with no factual basis as far as I can tell.

Although I'm certain that HF planned for the financial future of his wife, I'm not sure that he planned for the death of his daughter and the SBX son-in -law. I won't even wager a guess how much it will cost to provide for the 5 children through college and perhaps a start on life after college. Honestly, and I pray I'm wrong, GF needs to makes plans for someone else to step in and finish raising these children if needed...perhaps many someones. Whereas, HF may have planned for a reasonable inheritance for his daughters and a comfortable life for his wife, there is no promise that the estate will cover all the kids' future costs.

Publicly making this type of statement is crass, unwarranted, and evil. If NP allowed his "attorney" to make these comments, they both should be reprimanded.
(Edited: A few "weird" things happening when I quote someone.)

So he thinks SHE has too much money so HE and HIS CLIENT want it. Did anyone say she didn’t do work she was paid for? Who gets to keep all the money for work never done? MOO.

 

[HopeForTheBest]

"enjoyed her trip to Miami." "allow her to travel outside Connecticut without court permission."

Very important points of reference for "we, the people": travel must be preapproved, vetted and authorized inclusive of modes of travel and companion(s)/or contacts. My DH (retired Ct. Statie) indicated that great pleasure will be/has been taken in informing LEOs that there's a "high value" anklet with GPS (that they can also monitor, prn) in the jurisdiction. Major (or sometimes minor depending on the "perp") deviations from the approved itinerary/behaviors can result in retention & restraint of said individual!

She's NOT a "free spirit" by any definition! Leos are NOT thrilled with folks involved in orphaning young children, no matter what jurisdiction of residence!
all IMHO with "cheerleading words" from darling hubby!

Thank you so much, Joypath, and please thank your husband for me, too. I feel better hearing this. Thank you! MOO.

 

[HopeForTheBest]

And under Hug’s plan, even that heavily discounted settlement amount he gets from Pattis won’t all go to the Farber estate, but will be divided among all the creditors, possibly even Hug himself for his fees. I don’t know why “collateral estoppel” wouldn’t apply here, since a court already rendered a judgment for Farber estate (Cesar Noble?) in a prior court proceeding—which IMO should prevail over the probate judge’s ruling. (Any lawyers out there with comment?) Then there’s Judge Sheridan, who’s called a hearing for 10/6 on Weinstein’s complaint against Pattis (and possibly Hug’s if their cases are consolidated), and has asked that the parties be prepared to engage in settlement discussion. Weinstein’s complaint—to my understanding—contains a clause that he can go after NP’s assets directly, by-passing the probate court to meet Farber’s financial demand. Also, it asks for an accounting from NP on how the money he got from Dulos was spent. Since under the First Amendment we, the public, have access to the courts, we should get to know all of that. IMO Hug is trying to protect NP in his secret negotiations with him—much as Judge Noble protected NP from having to discuss how he was being paid by FD.

Thank you so much, Pernickety! I don’t have this kind of knowledge and it helps so much to understand more thanks to you and others here. MOO.

 

[sds71]

Marissa Alter

Several of you have reached out about pictures Michelle Troconis posted on social media with family in Florida. Attorney Jon Schoenhorn confirmed she is there and said the trip was okayed by Judge Blawie shortly after the last hearing because Troconis’ father had been in the ICU with COVID-19 and was recently been released.