I know if Mr BeachSky leaves his car unlocked it “searches” for his fob… thus drains his battery.
Ditto!
Correct, FD is no longer with us. But he left the prima donna, socialite wannabe holding the bag. Specifically a trash bag, with her fingerprints, containing bloody items linked to JFd, recently declared deceased. It wasn't just up against the Tacoma that FD and MT are inextricably entwined. Throw KM in there too for greedy bedfellows in this sex, lies and phone calls to Greece sick plot.
IMO ..Yes. MT seems to pay the most attention to FD trying to get back with JD. Wow her body language. She takes her hands away from her face..sits straight up..stops whining …& says “I’m sorry WHAT?”
I thought FD left the car that way so it would look as if JFD was abducted while she was jogging there. Where do you think JS was going with his questions about the topography of that area--e.g., the nearness of the Merritt Pkwy to the trail and road and whether the Parkway was above or below? An alleged escape route to the Pkwy?
Yes, yes, yes. True disconnect. Evidence of the “if she didn’t ‘do it’ (her words), she shouldn’t be held responsible” attitude discussed earlier.
For a surgeon, he isn’t very smart.
The coat her sister was wearing looked cheap, and looked like she slept in it.
Yes, your recollection about leaving car running is the same as mine. I also wonder (but don't remember as we must have discussed the onboard computer system ages ago) whether leaving the vehicle the way it was (out of gas and dead battery) had the effect of impacting the computer system? We know the key fob was brought to Lapham Road but my recollection was that the vehicle was dead so the key fob was useless at the scene. Someone posted about the battery issues with the 2017 Suburbans which might answer the question of why the vehicle died but I don't know the impact of a dead battery on the data in the OnStar system? I still believe the body of JD is in the NC area based on the timeline and wonder if the computer system of the Suburban might shed more light on what precisely happened? We have never seen any evidence from the OnStar so far as I recall so I wonder if the reason why is because it doesn't exist? I truly don't know. I hope the strongest evidence has never been publicly seen as it was encouraging to see such clear scene footage from the neighbours security cams. I've always questioned the bloody footprint in the Welles garage so perhaps we might get some answers about it as well.
Bbm
IDK about MT hitting the stand and it might just be too early to tell. JS seemed to leave the issue up in the air which given where we are in the trial seems about right. They might have to do it if the evidence mountain is an insurmountable climb imo as I believe the Conspiracy charge carries a well deserved 20 years in CT. I'm hoping that the State withheld the most compelling evidence for trial and that once its all presented that there is a clearly delineated case for Conspiracy. Clearly the cell phone data of MT exclusion might impact things but I would think that most of that information could be back doored by other means by the State if they so chose to do so.
Love the interjection of Trial Fashion as its a great palette cleanser from this heavy trial! This should have its own thread imo! Thanks for bringing it up.
The nanny as you point out was the heroine of this case as I have no doubt that she saved the children. Ditto for Gloria Farber getting an armed guard to protect the children from a no doubt manic FD in NYC.
I thought it was just a basic duffle coat. But I suppose it wouldn’t surprise me if it was expensive, and also wouldn’t surprise me if she is wearing it because Jennifer Dulos and Gloria Farber indirectly paid for it (if it was purchased prior to Jennifer’s death)
