State is using disk she had prepared for counsel.
Defense agrees to all photos except two.
Photos of the Toyota Tacoma. Witness identifies the attachment for a snowplow.
State asks about oil, whether it came from the Tacoma. Witness says he couldn't say for sure.
Tires looked recently clean. Tires and rims, clean.
Witness identifies trailer hitch. License plate was also clean.
Two automotive seats in the bed. The seat cover was also in the bed.
View of underside of the seat.
DNA swabs from license plate screws.
State asks why DNA was taken from the screws. "We learned..."
Objection, sustained.
Wore gloves, mask.
Did not swab door handles. Because it had been about two weeks since May 24th, plus it had been watched.
Located a bloodlike stain on the door. Tested it with Kastle Meyer.
Objection, objects to this test or any other, irrelevant [was a looooooong litany of objections]
Judge overrules.
Tested it with Luminol.
Objection, overruled
Witness is looking at photos 9 and 10 privately. Photo during processing it with Luminol. Photo 10 is an overlay.
JS is objecting and wants to voir dire
Judge schools. No voir dire of an objection
Was Tested, wasn't actually blood, confusing to the jury. Wasn't organic, wasn't blood, isn't relevant, has nothing to do with the case.
JS it has no modicum of bearing
Probative value can be determined by investigation. Color, pattern, etc can determine whether presumptive testing is probative. Overruled.
To the rest of JS's Objection, the Judge says that's not an objection, that's cross examination.
Luminol showed areas of bluish glow.
JS objects, just wants his view on the record.
Tested some areas with Kastle reagent. Negative. But swabbed anyway.
Photo showing the Porsche seats propped in position in the front of the Tacoma.
[Sheesh, Fotis, nothing suspicious there.]