- Joined
- Oct 22, 2018
- Messages
- 17,963
- Reaction score
- 298,360
State proffers --
PG tells Judge that FD had photos on his phone showing the various cameras on her house.
PG told FD he didn't think they were cameras but that she could have small cameras-- "she could record you, don't do anything stupid"
State isn't offering it for the truth of it, it goes to FD's concern, relative to a long planned crime.
JS: if I may respond briefly....
JS agrees that the State has to prove FD commit murder, but he's arguing that this isn't FD's crime.
JS can't cross examine the other contractor or FD....
The Court sees this as hearsay and sees an exception. Due to the nature of conspiracy.
Now JS is spouting. Court disagrees.
Jury returning.
PG tells Judge that FD had photos on his phone showing the various cameras on her house.
PG told FD he didn't think they were cameras but that she could have small cameras-- "she could record you, don't do anything stupid"
State isn't offering it for the truth of it, it goes to FD's concern, relative to a long planned crime.
JS: if I may respond briefly....
JS agrees that the State has to prove FD commit murder, but he's arguing that this isn't FD's crime.
JS can't cross examine the other contractor or FD....
The Court sees this as hearsay and sees an exception. Due to the nature of conspiracy.
Now JS is spouting. Court disagrees.
Jury returning.