Backwoods
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2006
- Messages
- 4,666
- Reaction score
- 147
Not sure this is the same one but similar.
http://marthamoxley.com/news/020102gt.htm
From your link:
But what if -- they DID find DNA and it WASN'T Martha's own? In that case, the only way I can think they could immediately rule out Michael Skakel as the donor, without a sample from him, would be if it came from another (other than Martha, I mean) female.Prosecutors withdrew their request for Michael Skakel's DNA yesterday after testing evidence that included clippings from Martha Moxley's nails and unidentified hair samples....
...Defense attorney Michael Sherman said he received a phone call from State's Attorney Jonathan Benedict yesterday morning saying the state no longer needed Skakel to submit to any tests.
"Whatever examination they made, the net result is that there is no DNA link to Michael Skakel," Sherman said. ...
...The nail clippings were tested to see whether there was evidence of Skakel's skin under Moxley's nails, said David San Pietro, a scientist at the Westchester County Forensic Lab who was recently hired by Sherman.
"This could be indicative that they couldn't get any DNA from the material in the first place, or that any DNA they were able to get was consistent with the victim and nobody else's," he said. ...
That would be wild!