Sasquatch321
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2014
- Messages
- 2,919
- Reaction score
- 550
Why would they take an umbrella stand?
Because the dog hit on it? Because it is right there next to the chest which has blood residue on it?
Why would they take an umbrella stand?
Why would they take an umbrella stand?
Because the dog hit on it? Because it is right there next to the chest which has blood residue on it?
Right, blood can be tested. This is why I don't understand why you keep reiterating your point.🤔Everyone keeps dismissing the DNA from the third search. A chest was found, there is blood on it as according to DR. We don't know everything that was found, but we also know technology needs advancement to test these items. And that is where it still stands today. Maybe too early to be having pity on this guy. We know alot of other killers were sweethearts too.
Right, blood can be tested. This is why I don't understand why you keep reiterating your point.��
What is advanced technology going to do, in your opinion?
I'm genuinely curious.
Are you now referring to DR as a " sweet heart? "
I'm lost
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
I see.Advanced technology is telling me that whatever evidence they were able to recover is very delicate. What are we testing exactly? A splotch of blood or speckles of blood on a chest? Had someone in the rassier family tried to clean it off once? How old could it be? Did they also find something else? I don't know. As far as DR being a sweetheart, yeah it is possible, he is well received at work and from people close to him. It's too bad if he had a hand in this, I'd like to know why and what happened if that is the case.
The chest belonged to his aunt DR -newsclip. Which Aunt? This blog has discussed PM. DR is a 2nd cousin to PM. They share the same great grandparents. They may not know each other. DNA shared between 2nd cousins is 2.85% to 5.04%. Perhaps the 89' European vacation was discussed between relatives providing opportunity for a planned crime by the perpetrator(s). This is my opinion only.
Can you give a hint like P-- M--?
I think they're referring to Phillip Meemken. His name is on the Who's Who thread on here. Meemken was sent to prison for violating probation last fall.
http://www.sctimes.com/story/news/local/2015/09/04/judge-sentences-meemken-prison/71717450/
The chest belonged to his aunt DR -newsclip. Which Aunt? This blog has discussed PM. DR is a 2nd cousin to PM. They share the same great grandparents. They may not know each other. DNA shared between 2nd cousins is 2.85% to 5.04%. Perhaps the 89' European vacation was discussed between relatives providing opportunity for a planned crime by the perpetrator(s). This is my opinion only.
First, apparently this PM individual used alcohol as part of grooming/seduction technique. Neither he nor DR have any history of surprise attacks on young boys or abductions. While I am not always convinced that profiling works, the profile done for Jacob's abductor said there would be a history of such assaults and most likely failed attempts. Moreover, the profile suggested that there would be significant personal stressors at the time of Jacob's abduction and there are physical characteristics that match the eyewitness descriptions. This profile fits DH from beginning to end. I'm not sure why people persist in trying to fit DR into this scenario. The stupidest thing in the world would be to kidnap a neighbor child in front of two other people in your own driveway.
YepFirst, apparently this PM individual used alcohol as part of grooming/seduction technique. Neither he nor DR have any history of surprise attacks on young boys or abductions. While I am not always convinced that profiling works, the profile done for Jacob's abductor said there would be a history of such assaults and most likely failed attempts. Moreover, the profile suggested that there would be significant personal stressors at the time of Jacob's abduction and there are physical characteristics that match the eyewitness descriptions. This profile fits DH from beginning to end. I'm not sure why people persist in trying to fit DR into this scenario. The stupidest thing in the world would be to kidnap a neighbor child in front of two other people in your own driveway.
Don't you think if Aaron thought for a millisecond, that DR was the perp, he'd have said SOMETHING by now??Its not hard to get past this. Show three more tires and more footprints. What is Aarons impression of DR and Heinrich after now hearing heinrichs voice?
Don't you think if Aaron thought for a millisecond, that DR was the perp, he'd have said SOMETHING by now??
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk