beesy
myspace.com/beesy_boo
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2005
- Messages
- 1,814
- Reaction score
- 21
I believe Darlie is guilty. So I believe any recovered memory of hers is BS. So I believe that if she could explain any of this she would have "recovered" it by now. She just says well it was contaminated because the clothes were put together, typing is wrong, blah blah. You know that cast-off is not created by transfer.SnootyVixen said:No the spray is not going the wrong way. I said the knife was upraised in the hand of the knifeholder and then brought down to try to stab her. Cast off could happen while the knife was being upraised and if her were standing close to Darlie then the back of her shirt could very easily get a tiny drop of cast off with the front getting a lot and the intruder also getting a lot of cast off.
Darlie saying she was not attacked standing means nothing. I don't think she ever said she WAS NOT attacked standing up, rather she just never said anything about being attacked standing up. I don't think she remembers it because I think it was a part of when she saw her children stabbed to death and she has buried that memory deep. And if you all don't believe in buried memory then you don't but I do.
Snooty, she doesn't say alot of things. She doesn't say she was attacked on the stairs, she doesn't say she was attacked in the kitchen, she doesn't say she was attacked at the front door, she doesn't say "a dingo stole my baby". I believe in buried memory, but I do not believe Darlie's BS. It cannot cancel out everything else.
There was no cast-off on her front. There is only cast-off on her back. The tails on her back would be going the other way.The cast-off on her back is not one teeny spot. Do you have your book with you? Even Chris admits it's more than a teeny spot.
Snooty, you are smarter than this, I know you are