This glove is a whole new mystery in my opinion.
So many questions, namely what the hell was it doing there?
I am backing away from the computer now. :blush: Sorry for all the posts. Just waiting for you all to wake up!!
Hi ladies,
this is sort of off topic.
I'm concerned by many of you saying you put your
phone's in your bra's when busy etc.
please be careful, don't put them near your
breasts, they don't know if phone's can be cancer
causing.
AND thankyou thankyou to all who are going in to court.
SO appreciated xxxxx
Good point. Thankyou. I guess this is something we will find out in a few years time when it starts to show.![]()
Another court artist's sketch of GBC...
![]()
http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/...erard-baden-clay/story-e6freoof-1226595106254
So who is going today? Anyone?
If Dr Charlie Teo (the best brain surgeon in Australia) says he sees 10-20 new cases of head cancers a week and one third is around the ear and believes it is linked to mobile phones.....well you have to think he may be right. You cannot be too careful.Years ago we were told we would all have brain tumours from mobile phones
Defence barrister Peter Davis asked Ms Walker whether she believed Baden-Clay was a suspect when she first gave a statement.
She said Baden-Clay had told her police would point the finger at him.
"Gerard mentioned to me the morning he arrived that police would suspect him," she said.
Copied the above from an earlier post today.
How awful for Kerry-Ann to have been told this by GBC on the morning of her disappearance.
What a hideously frightening scenario to find yourself landed in- supposedly your best friend has failed to return from a walk, husband has massive scratches on his face, and then tells you that the police will suspect him.
He knew what would be coming, because he knew what he had done, and he began networking with Kerry-Ann to generate a level of trust between himself and her, and to discredit the police.
A truly nasty nasty scenario, IMO
Hi hgl - it is interesting that you thought his demeanour was different, if you could see him when he was seated. My observations were only from when he first walked in (then promptly hid), then the other times when he stood up during proceedings, or walked around in there in the breaks. Perhaps he could relax more when all eyes weren't on him.
Were you inside for the entire break? I find it amazing that, if you saw what I saw, you wouldn't interpret it as talking and laughing. Anyway, it is interesting how we can all interpret things differently isn't it. I just am relieved that others saw it too, so sleuthers here don't think I imagined it or made it up, because I promise you all I didn't! I hesitated to post it for this reason, perhaps I shouldn't have, sorry everyone. Everything is open to interpretation and I only gave you mine.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.