Debbie Bradley and Jeremy Irwin on Dr. Phil 3 February 2012

[al66pine]

Did Tx St Bd discipline Dr. Phil for sleeping w. a patient?
(re # 630's & 640's posts by vlpate and believe09 et al)

Short answer = NO.
Based on wiki & footnotes, linking to what appear to be legit attachments of Tx bd. produced documents in 1988,
I see no reference to sexual or intimate physical Dr-Pt contact, at least in that disciplinary matter.

The st bd's findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order are set forth in these 3 pages in 3 links, per footnotes 13, 14, & 15:
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2469/3744083552_38d45c8043_b.jpg.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3496/3743288391_cfa3a1c50b_b.jpg.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2454/3744080578_26c0e60fae_b.jpg.
If the above links do not work,
[ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phil_McGraw"]Phil McGraw - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/ame] or google wiki dr. phil,
then scroll down to footnotes 13, 14, 15, and click on links.

Wiki summarizes:
"The Texas State Board of Examiners of Psychologists determined on October 21, 1988, that McGraw had hired a former patient for "part-time temporary employment".[13] Specifically the Board cited "a possible failure to provide proper separation between termination of therapy and the initiation of employment"[14] and issued a letter of reprimand and imposed administrative penalties.[15]"

As to the 'sleeping-with' claim in above posts, wiki continues:

"The Board also investigated claims made by the patient of inappropriate contact initiated by McGraw, but the "Findings of Fact" document issued by the Board on October 21, 1988, at the end of its investigation, includes no reference to any physical contact of any kind. It specifically identified "the therapeutic and business relationships" as constituting McGraw's sole issue with the Board.[15" BBM, IBM

Dr. Phil's Tx license
Wiki also links to the Tx bd's Sept. 2006 letter --
--ackowledging receipt of Dr. Phil's request to retire his license as psychologist and
--stating his request was reviewed and granted.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3468/3750482552_6024990f7b_b.jpg.
Again, you can link to doc's at wiki dr. phil.

Hope that helps.

 

[beach]

Alerts GALORE on this thread overnight!


The topic of this thread is-

Deborah Bradley & Jeremy Irwin's upcoming appearance on Dr. Phil.


I just moved one recent post to the correct topical thread. I'm not going to take the time to clean up all the others. Please do not quote those and exacerbate the off topic discussion.


This is not a general discussion thread. If this thread continues to veer off-topic, it will be closed until the show airs on Feb. 3rd.

Done with babysitting this thread and done with removing OT posts.

Will re-open when the show airs.

 

[peeples]

I didn't see a thread for this and since we're supposed to stay on thread topic I figured I'd start one..

Does anyone think we'll learn anything new from the show appearance?
If so, what???

I saw a clip today and DB said something about the lights and then they cut away... I'm wondering WHAT about the lights will be revealed...

 

[katydid23]

Is it on today?

 

[nursebeeme]

the doctor phil thread was closed for tos violations and snark in general... it will open on friday when the show airs

 

[nursebeeme]

Everyone must read and thank this post before posting in this thread: there will be absolutely NO SNARK, and NO BASHING of anyone in this thread.. that includes case players, the good Doctor, or other posters.

**if for some reason the thread is still locked at showtime please hit the alert button for a mod to come and open the doors**

 

[ExpectingUnicorns]

Just heard a teaser on FOX that someone who was in the room (during the Dr Phil taping, I think) will be talking with them (MK?) in their upcoming segment.

 

[ExpectingUnicorns]

Showing Dr Phil's promo.
MK introducing Bill Stanton.

 

[ExpectingUnicorns]

BS says JT claims he was told by LE that DB did not fail the lie detector test.

 

[octobermoon]

Bill S. is on Fox with MK.

(Thanks EU! )

BS says LE told JT Deb passed the poly.

 

[ExpectingUnicorns]

BS: "We will be holding a press conference soon."

 

[octobermoon]

BS is saying lots of teasers, but never really says much. IMO, JMO

 

[octobermoon]

MOO

BS went into the studio with Dr. P. because BS really likes to be on TV. IMO JMO

(again thanks to EU for the heads up)

 

[ExpectingUnicorns]

BS is saying lots of teasers, but never really says much. IMO, JMO

ITA. "T-t-t-t-that's all folks."

 

[octobermoon]

KANSAS CITY, Mo. - The mother of a missing Kansas City baby told Dr. Phil part of the family’s initial report to police was a “total exaggeration.

Read more: http://www.nbcactionnews.com/dpp/ne...-original-story-was-exaggerated#ixzz1lFhhMQIn

 

[Sherbie]

Bill invented a new word ("deceptful").

 

[Donjeta]

Her parents, Jeremy Irwin and Deborah Bradley, reported to police that Jeremy Irwin came home from an overnight shift at about 4 a.m. to find all the lights in their Northland home on and Lisa missing from her crib.

But in an episode of Dr. Phil slated to air Friday, Feb. 3, when asked whether someone who may have kidnapped Lisa would turn on all the lights in the house, Bradley told him that portion of their story was not necessarily true.

http://www.nbcactionnews.com/dpp/ne...-original-story-was-exaggerated#ixzz1lFhhMQIn



Harrumph.
So they told Dr Phil that what they told the police was "not necessarily true" (is this the same as a lie?) but they have got nothing whatsoever to talk about with the police?

Didn't he list the lights that were on somewhere? I'm thinking it was in a People article but I could be wrong. There was a pumpkin light and an accent light and a couple of others?

 

[Dewey2Me1MoThyme]

http://www.nbcactionnews.com/dpp/ne...-original-story-was-exaggerated#ixzz1lFhhMQIn



Harrumph.
So they told Dr Phil that what they told the police was "not necessarily true" (is this the same as a lie?) but they have got nothing whatsoever to talk about with the police?

Didn't he list the lights that were on somewhere? I'm thinking it was in a People article but I could be wrong. There was a pumpkin light and an accent light and a couple of others?

Taken in context, Jeremy said he came home and all the lights were on. I don't see this as a lie. I will often ask my wife why she has all the lights on when she has gone to lay down for a nap in the evening, when in actuality, the mudroom light may be off, the lamp in the office may be off the the ceiling light is on, no lights on in the bedrooms we keep for guests etc. It was a figure of speech IMHO!

 

[Dewey2Me1MoThyme]

http://www.nbcactionnews.com/dpp/ne...-original-story-was-exaggerated#ixzz1lFhhMQIn



Harrumph.
So they told Dr Phil that what they told the police was "not necessarily true" (is this the same as a lie?) but they have got nothing whatsoever to talk about with the police?

Didn't he list the lights that were on somewhere? I'm thinking it was in a People article but I could be wrong. There was a pumpkin light and an accent light and a couple of others?

Taken in context, Jeremy said he came home and all the lights were on. I don't see this as a lie. I will often ask my wife why she has all the lights on when she has gone to lay down for a nap in the evening, when in actuality, the mudroom light may be off, the lamp in the office may be off the the ceiling light is on, no lights on in the bedrooms we keep for guests etc. It was a figure of speech IMHO!

 

[Donjeta]

Taken in context, Jeremy said he came home and all the lights were on. I don't see this as a lie. I will often ask my wife why she has all the lights on when she has gone to lay down for a nap in the evening, when in actuality, the mudroom light may be off, the lamp in the office may be off the the ceiling light is on, no lights on in the bedrooms we keep for guests etc. It was a figure of speech IMHO!

I can see that when coming home and asking his fiancee angrily, "Why are all the lights on?"

But no reason not to be more specific when the police asks and you know they need exact details and not exaggerations and misleading figures of speech. You'd want them to know which lightswitches the abductor touched.