LancelotLink
Better Days
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2008
- Messages
- 5,371
- Reaction score
- -26
I was at first thinking this could be something ruled on before by SS, but the wording has me kerflunkled.
Yes, here it is - Tulessa has just posted the motion in Todays News - No Discussion.
http://www.wesh.com/pdf/27276629/detail.html
Casey Anthony Updates
New filing in the case:
The Defense is objecting to Dr. Hall's report being considered "opinion" rather than expert testimony.
Multiple posting - looks like I owe a Coke to Paintr and Yeknowaras
I thought this was argued by Simms orginally. Why is Mason filing the motion and not her? Does she perhaps not agree with him?
I thought this was argued by Simms orginally. Why is Mason filing the motion and not her? Does she perhaps not agree with him?
Could I please have tea instead? :truce: I am not a cola fan.
I seriously can't see this motion swaying the Judge's opinion. I think I see a 'motion denied' in the defense team future.
It's Cheney Mason...he seems to throw things at the wall to see if they will stick. Remember, this is "fun" for him. Mason thinks he is brilliant and very powerful, and sometimes things do stick, remember the whole Judge Strickland-has-to-recuse-himself thing? All Mason.Why does it seem like the defense is trying to argue the motion "after" the ruling was already made? Reconsider, I will guess "no."
It's Cheney Mason...he seems to throw things at the wall to see if they will stick. Remember, this is "fun" for him. Mason thinks he is brilliant and very powerful, and sometimes things do stick, remember the whole Judge Strickland thing?
It's Cheney Mason...he seems to throw things at the wall to see if they will stick. Remember, this is "fun" for him. Mason thinks he is brilliant and very powerful, and sometimes things do stick, remember the whole Judge Strickland-has-to-recuse-himself thing? All Mason.
It's Cheney Mason...he seems to throw things at the wall to see if they will stick. Remember, this is "fun" for him. Mason thinks he is brilliant and very powerful, and sometimes things do stick, remember the whole Judge Strickland-has-to-recuse-himself thing? All Mason.
This is what I got in a 5-minute scan of what smells like pure Cheney Mason to me:
If hes an expert citing only his opinion and not using expert methods then:
Why is he referencing 28-year old research literature? (ohhhh, the irony IS rich)
Why is he using a ruler?
Why did he use the word "methodology" in a sentence during his deposition?
Wouldn't that make him an expert welding more than mere opinion?
Oh, and if he is not an expert, he is a layperson, and has no right being called as an expert. (that falls under pot, kettle in my book)
FAIL.
:shakehead:
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.