Did You Know That Patsy Spelled Advise Wrong In The Sample RN?

[JMO8778]

It doesn't take much to be a revolutionary you know. Anybody can be a revolutionary.

Are you saying that of the millions of revolutionaries throughout history, nobody has ever put "Victory!" as a closing salutation? Or threatened to execute or behead anyone in writing? Have you ever read any letters written by socialist revolutionaries? Even one? Which one? So how do you know what revolutionaries sound like, when anybody can be a revolutionary?

..including Patsy.

You tell me, of all the people in the world, who really does threaten to execute or behead people in writing (and not simply 'kill,' as would be expected in a 'staged' ransom note)? If you suggest drugged or irritated or drunk housewives, how can I take that seriously?

because,as you say....ANYBODY can be a revolutionary.and anybody can play one as well.

 

[DeeDee249]

Actually, some people who threaten to "execute or behead" people are simply mentally unbalanced. Sound like anyone we know?

 

[JMO8778]

You may as well suggest JBR was killed by the house cat. Thats how I see RDI.

house cat,fat cat.not much difference,is there?
maybe the house cat was a fat cat.

 

[Holdontoyourhat]

Gibberish.

Let me know when you've got something real, like any evidence of a legitimate use for EITHER the cord OR the tape anywhere in the house.

Oh, I forgot, RDI is claiming that BOTH were purchased but NEITHER were used prior to the murder. And further claiming that evidence of wrappers or rolls for BOTH items were carefully removed from the house, while pens, paper, pineapple and paintbrushes were not.

More gibberish.

 

[DeeDee249]

Gibberish.

Let me know when you've got something real, like any evidence of a legitimate use for EITHER the cord OR the tape anywhere in the house.

Oh, I forgot, RDI is claiming that BOTH were purchased but NEITHER were used prior to the murder. And further claiming that evidence of wrappers or rolls for BOTH items were carefully removed from the house, while pens, paper, pineapple and paintbrushes were not.

More gibberish.

No one is claiming the Rs never used cord and tape prior to the murder. I am sure they had been. But obviously, they ran out and PR purchased more. Whatever was leftover was removed from the home THAT night by the Rs as they left unsearched wearing heavy coats. Tape and cord are small items and as they were both used to stage a dead body, they were not something the Rs would have ever forgotten to remove.

 

[Holdontoyourhat]

No one is claiming the Rs never used cord and tape prior to the murder. I am sure they had been. But obviously, they ran out and PR purchased more. Whatever was leftover was removed from the home THAT night by the Rs as they left unsearched wearing heavy coats. Tape and cord are small items and as they were both used to stage a dead body, they were not something the Rs would have ever forgotten to remove.

You seem to be forgetting that in RDI the R's were staging a crime scene where an intruder was using everything from the house. Pen, paper, and paintbrush were all from the house and the R's never denied it.

I don't think RDI has a single clue on why cord and tape would be treated or viewed differently than the paintbrush. If what you stated is true, then the R's would not have wanted the garrote handle to be seen as coming from the house. They would've done something to alienate the garrote handle from the house.

There are just so many RDI workarounds for IDI-leaning evidence I've lost count. That the R's purchased or smuggled either the cord or the tape isn't factually known. It is nevertheless used in RDI as a workaround to account for the general lack of cord and tape evidence.

 

[BBB167893]

I don't think RDI has a single clue on why cord and tape would be treated or viewed differently than the paintbrush.

I have an idea about that. The tape and cord are inextricably linked to the actual killing, but the note gives you wiggle room. What I mean is by not ditching the pen and paper, the stager could claim that the note was an afterthought; they could claim it was written prior to the killing because the intruder got bored waiting, or written after as a way to really grind it into the surviving family members.

As for the paintbrush, do we REALLY have to go there?

If what you stated is true, then the R's would not have wanted the garrote handle to be seen as coming from the house. They would've done something to alienate the garrote handle from the house.

No one thinks of everything.

There are just so many RDI workarounds for IDI-leaning evidence I've lost count. That the R's purchased or smuggled either the cord or the tape isn't factually known. It is nevertheless used in RDI as a workaround to account for the general lack of cord and tape evidence.

I can think of any number of possibilities.

Walk a mile, Holdon.

 

[Anniegirl]

I did know of the mispelling &

I knew of the lower case q that looks like an 8-- who else would do that? And what were chances someone did that just as Patsy does? hmmmmmmmmm ( River Rat gave me that light bulb moment)

 

[RiverRat]

I did know of the mispelling &

I knew of the lower case q that looks like an 8-- who else would do that? And what were chances someone did that just as Patsy does? hmmmmmmmmm ( River Rat gave me that light bulb moment)

Just doing my job! :blowkiss:

 

[BBB167893]

Just doing my job! :blowkiss:

Damn fine job, too!

Oh, and I have something for Holdon. He's free to correct me, but I don't think he truly understands the concept of staging. So here's something to help out:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,445184,00.html

 

[Holdontoyourhat]

Damn fine job, too!

Oh, and I have something for Holdon. He's free to correct me, but I don't think he truly understands the concept of staging. So here's something to help out:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,445184,00.html

I read the choking part, but this murder isn't doing the same thing, having the same effect, as the brutal murder of a 6 year old whom nobody could have a very serious argument with. Let me help YOU out with this:

http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/europe/10/09/russian.killer.ap/index.htmlhttp://www.theforumsite.com/forum/topic/Russian-serial-killer-says-murder-is-like-love/169361

Now THIS is a nutcase, a brutal killer.

No matter what spin or sugar coating you want to put on it, JBR WAS brutally murdered. And no rational person is going to say she wasn't. You're looking right past the brutality thru your rose colored glasses, and finding similarities in murder cases that have no brutality like JBR's murder.

 

[RiverRat]

Damn fine job, too!

Oh, and I have something for Holdon. He's free to correct me, but I don't think he truly understands the concept of staging. So here's something to help out:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,445184,00.html

Happy Aniversary again, my Friend.......hopefully, your life was not the only one changed six years ago......I can vouch for you enhancing mine!

And as far as HoldOn - I suspect that since to him that the world is a stage, that concept is familiar. Just My Op!

 

[JMO8778]

yes and Hold thinks we're supposed to be the stooges !
really,what kind of investigator would walk into a crime scene or look at evidence and take everything at face value? esp. w ridiculous rambling 3 pg so-called 'ransom note' and a dead child found in the basement of her own home???? a very dumb one,that's for sure.

 

[BBB167893]

I read the choking part, but this murder isn't doing the same thing, having the same effect, as the brutal murder of a 6 year old whom nobody could have a very serious argument with.

Actually, my intent was not to compare the two killings per se, Holdon. It's just sometimes I get the feeling you don't truly understand what I'm (or any other RDI is) all about.

As for no one being able to have a serious argument with a six-year-old, I can think of several things that ONE person in particular could have with her.

But maybe that's the problem here, Holdon. You're trying to make sense of this killing. I gave up on that a long time ago. And let me tell you why: because child murder NEVER makes sense to me. Let me be even more forthright. The day it DOES make sense to me, I will PRAY for death.

Let me help YOU out with this:

http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/europe/10/09/russian.killer.ap/index.htmlhttp://www.theforumsite.com/forum/topic/Russian-serial-killer-says-murder-is-like-love/169361

Now THIS is a nutcase, a brutal killer.

No argument here!

No matter what spin or sugar coating you want to put on it, JBR WAS brutally murdered. And no rational person is going to say she wasn't.

ALL murder is brutal, Holdon. But that doesn't change anything.

You're looking right past the brutality thru your rose colored glasses, and finding similarities in murder cases that have no brutality like JBR's murder.

As I said, Holdon: I wasn't trying to find similarities between the two (farthest thing from my mind). I was just trying to add some perspective.

 

[BBB167893]

yes and Hold thinks we're supposed to be the stooges !
really,what kind of investigator would walk into a crime scene or look at evidence and take everything at face value? esp. w ridiculous rambling 3 pg so-called 'ransom note' and a dead child found in the basement of her own home???? a very dumb one,that's for sure.

I can think of ONE in particular. (I'm sure RR knows what I mean!)

 

[RiverRat]

RR and the Q's know whatcha mean!

Look up, Look Down..........Nuff Said.

 

[JMO8778]

I can think of ONE in particular. (I'm sure RR knows what I mean!)

do you think Smit sold out early on,or was he brought in right from the beginning (sought out beforehand,with someone knowing just where to find what they were looking for) to distort the facts and play on the RST side? I don't have my book on me,but in DOI,JR talks about a private meeting with him at their attorney's office.Sounds pretty suspect to me,so I'm guessing the latter.

 

[BBB167893]

do you think Smit sold out early on,or was he brought in right from the beginning (sought out beforehand,with someone knowing just where to find what they were looking for) to distort the facts and play on the RST side? I don't have my book on me,but in DOI,JR talks about a private meeting with him at their attorney's office.Sounds pretty suspect to me,so I'm guessing the latter.

I'd go with the latter, too. By that, I mean that I can't help but wonder just who in the DA's office got in his ear in those first few hours and just what was said. Because I can imagine Trippy or Hofstrom or Lacy (if not Hunter himself) poisoning him against the police to suit their own agendas. Wouldn't surprise me one little bit.

 

[JMO8778]

me either,thanks,SD.

 

[Ames]

She probably just thought it was spelled with a z

I doubt it, she was a Journalism Major.