http://rekordnorth.co.za/30098/oscars-fate-known-tomorrow/
I concur!
This court incorrectly imposed the shortest period of incarceration it could possibly impose, Nel said, especially based on the finding that his actions had been grossly negligent.
He said the court had found that Pistorius was not a truthful witness and therefore the judge should have rejected the plethora of different defences the athlete had relied on during trial. If the court had taken the circumstantial evidence into account, it would have rendered Pistorius version of events on the night of Steenkamps death impossible.
This court should either have accepted or rejected Pistorius testimony as a whole, Nel argued, adding that if Masipa had done so, the end result of the trial would have been different.
I concur!
