Discussions on Formal Sentencing Hearing - Jodi Arias #10

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #181
Tooooooooooooooooo funny!

Hi everyone ! I am sort of new to the forum, I rarely post much due to being sort of shy, coupled with not really being all that smart.

<awkward pause>

I have a few questions to ask in regards to Jodi's prison sentence. These are hypothetical questions of course, and many of them could be answered with a yes or no. Some may take a wee bit of explanation, but hopefully not.

Prequalifications:
The individuals most qualified to provide these answers would most likely be: A) an attorney.....B) Someone who pretends to be an attorney...C) Someone who knows an attorney or has one in their family.....D) Someone that works in the prison system....E) Someone who has or is currently escaping from prison..... F) a legal scholar who resides in Arizona.... G) an Az legislator....H) anybody that has an A, C, D, E, S, P, or M in their name..
K) Individuals born in the 50's, 60's or 70's.

------------------------------------------
The questions:

1) After imprisoned, can Jodi get married to another female inmate ?

2) Does Arizona honor same sex marriages in a prison setting ?

3) If Jodi was to get married in prison, would she and her new wife get to share a common cell together ?

4) If Jodi's new wife was to get paroled and be released someday, could they as a couple apply to adopt a child or possibly go through a surrogate type of arrangement ?

5) Let's say that one of these days, Arizona elects a Governor who is single, handsome and available. If this man was to become pen pals with Jodi, and fall head over heels for her, could he pardon her, even with a life sentence ?

6) If after Jodi is pardoned, she moves into the governor's mansion and sets up house, remodels, and has her friends come around for sleepovers and bong parties, is this going to cause a conflict of interest for the Governor himself ?? Would it be illegal for him to have a convicted felon living with him, eating his food, and doing his laundry at the expense of the taxpayers?

7) In that movie, "The Green Mile", one of the prisoners had a little mouse that used to come around and hang out with him and he taught the mouse to do tricks and what-not. If Jodi was to befriend a mouse, a spider, a cockroach, or some other critter, would she be allowed to keep it, or would it have to schedule visitation just like everybody else ?

8) When Jodi's hair starts to turn grey prematurely, will they allow her to dye it back to it's original brown color if she can afford the Clairol "Nice and Easy" from the commissary, or perhaps get it through her family ?

9) Could President Obama pardon Jodi on the way out the door ? If she was to send him some of her most convincing "abuse" stories along with a few of her paintings, do you think he might ?

10) If Jodi was to apply to become a member of Websleuths, would she be approved as a "verified insider" ?
Would that be because she knows a lot about the case, or because she is in prison ?

I guess that's about all the questions I can think of right now. I was sitting around here all afternoon sipping on some Vodka and lemonade drinks, and all of a sudden these questions just sprang to mind !! I'd appreciate if one of the qualified people listed above would fill in the answers for me.

Thanks soooooo much for your time.......:oddsmiley:

:beersign:
 
  • #182
An IQ of 119 is nothing special. Most higher ed students would be in that category or above.

IIRC, the "superior" on the verbal category was on a basic literacy test. This is not a high bar! Also, if you toss longer words around, you can score high on standardized tests. I found this out when I had some very bright students who were learning English. They immediately figured out that they could sprinkle their prose with impressive-sounding words and have no idea what they meant, but get scored for having "very advanced" vocabularies. In a hilarious twist, I had a 21-year-old Sri Lankan student who tossed in the word "intoxicated." She was moved up several class levels on the basis of her great vocabulary. But she later asked me what "intoxicated" meant. I said it meant that a person had had too much alcohol. Ha! She said, shocked, "Nooooo, Ma'am!" In her family/culture, alcohol (let alone drunkenness) was not an appropriate subject for young ladies. Lol.

Anyway, Jodi is a sprinkler. Her vocabulary is not a "working vocabulary" and is very imprecise. It's all very "off". It would not score well in a university English class taught by a seasoned professional.

However, IMO, it served Juan's purposes very well that JA could be labeled in the "superior" category when it comes to language. It allowed him to present quantitative evidence that she is glib and was using the words she intended to use. Jodi couldn't come back around and credibly say she "wasn't able to articulate what she meant". (Although, no surprise, she tried this tack when asking for her secret testimony.) DeMarte/Juan made clear to highlight the "superior" designation in both trials: big trap for Jodi.

Oh my.
<begin sarcasm here>
It sure sounds like you're de-edifying Ms. Arias.
<end sarcasm here>


<for now>
 
  • #183
With all of these conversations about Jodi's sex life and pedo letters, it reminded me of a question I've been meaning to ask.

Someone that uses this forum a lot has a signature that says this :

"He who introduces KY into the relationship is no abused virgin." - Aristotle

Now, as has been explained to me thoroughly in here, I know I'm not the sharpest knife in the drawer sometimes. That being said, I'm also pretty sure that they weren't manufacturing KY-jelly back when Aristotle was walking around making comments like a know-it-all smarty-pants.

Can anybody explain to me the origin of that quote, and what it means, IF Aristotle actually said that ??

I believe it should more accurately state: "She who introduces KY into the relationship is an abused virgin" - "Einstein"
 
  • #184
Maybe you all have seen this bunch of %$#^... I had not. Ugh...
Like I care what books and magazines the killer is reading...

http://jodispage.com/index.html
 
  • #185
  • #186
Do we have to choose only one, or can we get a trifecta ticket? :thinking:
Yes, I do. I hope no one gives her so much as a passing glance. Move along, get in the van.
-------------
She will have a hissy fit over wearing stripes! Smile Jodi, trial is over. No more impressing the jury.
I wish someone would LOL :lol: at her in new Sunday go to meetin' clothes. I agree she wont have many visitors.
Scott ran into same thing~from San Diego. Don't know if she will leave Arpaio right away. Program said some get
two weeks to gather up. don't know if it applies to murderers.
 
  • #187
On twitter, some are saying Juan wanted the pedo letters in while Nurmi was trying to keep them out. Hummmm
 
  • #188
-------------
She will have a hissy fit over wearing stripes! Smile Jodi, trial is over. No more impressing the jury.
I wish someone would LOL :lol: at her in new Sunday go to meetin' clothes. I agree she wont have many visitors.
Scott ran into same thing~from San Diego. Don't know if she will leave Arpaio right away. Program said some get
two weeks to gather up. don't know if it applies to murderers.

Troy Hayden said in a report that her cell at PV is ready and she will leave the next morning.
 
  • #189
-------------
She will have a hissy fit over wearing stripes! Smile Jodi, trial is over. No more impressing the jury.
I wish someone would LOL :lol: at her in new Sunday go to meetin' clothes. I agree she wont have many visitors.
Scott ran into same thing~from San Diego. Don't know if she will leave Arpaio right away. Program said some get
two weeks to gather up. don't know if it applies to murderers.

Yet she seemed kinda proud of them on her first interview...
JAstripes5.jpg
 
  • #190
On twitter, some are saying Juan wanted the pedo letters in while Nurmi was trying to keep them out. Hummmm

If he did it was because he could prove they were forgeries and nurmi wouldn't want him to be able to do that. It would blow her entire defense out of the water and show how despicable she is and how low she was willing to go.
 
  • #191
  • #192
On twitter, some are saying Juan wanted the pedo letters in while Nurmi was trying to keep them out. Hummmm

Because both lawyers knew they were forged and Juan would have done a masterful job (as always) of dissecting it. I also would pay to have a mental health professional analyze those letters knowing they were forgeries. I said it before, that it's so funny she describes herself as the only person in the world who could understand and feel compassion.

That reminded me of when tom cruise says that scientologists are the only people who will stop to render aid at a car accident. wth was that interview - too funny if he wasn't so serious.

:puke:
 
  • #193
-------------
She will have a hissy fit over wearing stripes! Smile Jodi, trial is over. No more impressing the jury.
I wish someone would LOL :lol: at her in new Sunday go to meetin' clothes. I agree she wont have many visitors.
Scott ran into same thing~from San Diego. Don't know if she will leave Arpaio right away. Program said some get
two weeks to gather up. don't know if it applies to murderers.

TWO WEEKS! HA! Hasn't she had seven years! I hope they take right from the court room :-)
 
  • #194
L

I dont think PV has video visits. And she's only allowed 20 people on her visitors list and they have to go through a background check. With the "friends" she has, I don't see very many visits in her future.

forgot about no audio visits...oh well....there are bugs
 
  • #195
  • #196
If he did it was because he could prove they were forgeries and nurmi wouldn't want him to be able to do that. It would blow her entire defense out of the water and show how despicable she is and how low she was willing to go.


So, of course, they were not allowed.
 
  • #197
  • #198
Is anyone having a problem with about 1/3 of the screen showing ads, and links to True Crime Radio, Missing Persons, and Advertising? It looks so different, and shocked me. WOWZA.
 
  • #199
Is anyone having a problem with about 1/3 of the screen showing ads, and links to True Crime Radio, Missing Persons, and Advertising? It looks so different, and shocked me. WOWZA.

I am! It is big old Sidebar LOL!
 
  • #200
Is anyone having a problem with about 1/3 of the screen showing ads, and links to True Crime Radio, Missing Persons, and Advertising? It looks so different, and shocked me. WOWZA.

Yes, it's doing that to me too. I normally keep two browser windows open on split screen and this site is now nearly unreadable in that display mode.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
114
Guests online
2,773
Total visitors
2,887

Forum statistics

Threads
633,573
Messages
18,644,345
Members
243,597
Latest member
pmnrky
Back
Top