The complete May 26th text is now summarized. Make of it what you will.
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...messages/page9
Am I the only one who can't open this?
Are you'll messing with me? :tantrum:
The complete May 26th text is now summarized. Make of it what you will.
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...messages/page9
Am I the only one who can't open this?
Are you'll messing with me? :tantrum:
IMO, a jurors job is to consider all the evidence and render a decision. Listening to the other jurors is a requirement for deliberation, but not speaking. Juror #17 listened, saw the evidence and decided.
Have the backgrounds of ALL the jurors been audited and every skeleton exposed or just juror #17? This juror is NOT the one who violently murdered Travis Alexander. She did not deem that it met the criteria to warrant a DP for Jodi Arias.
Why is juror #17 being crucified for this?
Have the backgrounds of ALL the jurors been audited and every skeleton exposed or just juror #17? This juror is NOT the one who violently murdered Travis Alexander. She did not deem that it met the criteria to warrant a DP for Jodi Arias.
Why is juror #17 being crucified for this?
:seeya: Yep, it sure does !
"The Truth is Stranger Than Fiction" ... yep ... I don't even think JG could make some of this stuff up !
![]()
Out of curiosity, what are your thoughts on the information that has been verified about her connection to Juan Martinez, her social media posts regarding this case, and her unwillingness to give an example of a death deserving crime to her fellow jurors?
You seem to think she is being "crucified" for simply not participating in juror discussion, when so many other factors are involved. MOO.
Also, I respectfully disagree with your use of the word "crucified."
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I agree with you...not because of her vote but because if her stance was so strong that she could hang the jury then she ought to be strong enough to stand by that vote publicly. We probably wouldn't agree with her but I know I would feel much better about her vote if she would stand with the other 11 and say "yes, but here is how I see it..." and eliminate all questions regarding her motive. For me, her inability/unwillingness to explain her stance makes her look bad...real bad
Inside Edition will have a segment on the holdout juror in the Jodi Arias verdict. It's on now where I live but might not air until later in other locations. Check the site for article/video: www.insideedition.com
I was unable to open it also
The complete May 26th text is now summarized. Make of it what you will.
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...messages/page9
Here is a another one showing that Travis knew he was dealing with a pathological liar.TA: Cant you remember when you choose to take away my human rights, cant all the things Ive done to help you stop you (taking) away what belongs to me. How can you be such an ingrate. How many times can someone pay some one for service by stabbing them in the back. How do you live. How does a heart beat in such a corrupted carcass.
another chilling exert from their exchange
IMO, a jurors job is to consider all the evidence and render a decision. Listening to the other jurors is a requirement for deliberation, but not speaking. Juror #17 listened, saw the evidence and decided.
I can't get this to work. What am I doing wrong?