kolokolo
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2009
- Messages
- 1,051
- Reaction score
- 6,830
Mahalo.
Biachi for the sidekick.
Jodi Arias,.. Nurmi,... Love-child, ..... monkey
I think Nurmi name should be deleted!!
I know, but look at it this way...
The BIGGEST and BEST and most SURPRISING part of it is, that for once we might get to see justice served to JA and all of her supporters.
After months...actually, years of all our speculations to finally know that it's all being investigated is HUGE in my book!!
Yay!!!! I *KNEW* it was the money!! The fox guarding the hen house!!!
I am so HAPPY that the Alexander's now have a chance to get ALL OF IT!!! ...no wonder JA threw a tantrum!!!
Please tell MDLR WE WON!!!
Troy Hayden is taking questions and is digging into this. Says his 'spidey sense' is being tickled and suspects more to come.
On line now @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWkbFFQHb60
I'm voting JA.
Interesting read here concerning another MC mitigation specialist.
http://www.courthousenews.com/2014/02/10/65225.htm
[Cox]
was represented by Mr. James
Tucker.
Mr. Tucker did as any defense attorney
. . .
would
do
[.]
He]
obtained a list of
the potential jurors that would be in the pool of jurors
that
would be present for that day obviously in
preparation of the trial.
He
provided that to
[Cox]
as you would expect him to do.
[Cox]
looked over that list and saw
some individuals on there he
recognized; specifically a
Collette Childress.
He initially contacted Ms.
Childress via Facebook.
. . . [T]hat was on January4th and said to her histrail--that he put his trail, t-r-a-i-1, meant trial is January 9 and 10.
[“]
Please
don’t say you know me.
I seen you on the jury list
today and you
was one of them.
[”]
He went on to say that he felt like the
State didn’t have any
evidence.
[“]
In fact they might just
dismiss the case but
if they don’t, act like you don’t
know me at all.
I will hopefully get you on my jury
trial.
[”
This is an excellent post! Should be headline post! This really sums it up!Well personally I think MDLR shouldn't be in her role, it's freaking unreal that someone who is meant to be a mitigation expert is so easily manipulated by a borderline narcissist, and would get in bed financially with a con man from who runs these ridiculous sites. Talk about compromised.
Is the examiner.com article the big news we are waiting on ?
14 bank accounts in total
8 people with signatory permissions
Monies transferred around between accounts (no idea what for).
Article mentioned $4,100 transferred (transfered to where wasn't said).
SJ and MDLR involved in financial stuff, the accounts.
Tax returns or tax records not found; means taxes weren't filed (allegedly)
501c status of JA's fund is being looked at/considered.
SJ is allegedly a scummy scammer with his own 'get rich quick' type Interwebs schemes, not related to JA
IP addresses being tracked. MDLR found out her IP addy was being tracked. MDLR deleted her Twitter account(s)
Someone or several someones in authority are looking into this. Who these authorities are wasn't said.
Everyone involved in "Jodi-Land" is being looked at. (Jodi-land is the nickname the author uses to describe everything in Jodi's world including various supporters).
If this wasn't such a big deal, then I don't think MDLR would have deleted her twitter account, the day before this story broke. :moo:I know, but look at it this way...
The BIGGEST and BEST and most SURPRISING part of it is, that for once we might get to see justice served to JA and all of her supporters.
After months...actually, years of all our speculations to finally know that it's all being investigated is HUGE in my book!!