WHICH EVIDENCE WAS PLANTED and or tampered with?
1. The car (11/3 late night to early morning 11/5) Found on 11/5 about 10:30am
Technically found 11/3 by Sgt AC. He did call in and RAN PLATES Sam william henry 582
and knew it was the back of a 99' Toyota. Where was he when he called in these plates
what was he looking at when reading them off? This sets up the Crime of opportunity to
frame SA who was suing the whole county and may have continued to personally sue those
involved in his first wrongful conviction.
2. His blood in the car (11/3 late night to early morning 11/5) Found in car after opened at crime lab 11/5 Probably during Sgt AC's day off on the 4th. get things together and set for planting.
Possibly even burning the remains himself. To try to hide any DNA that would have pointed away
from SA.
3. The Camera PDA Phone Barrel by SA's home (11/3 late night to 11/7) Found 11/7
Used one barrel to move the bones, and placed the camera,
phone, pda and other belongings in an already used burn barrel they switched this barrel with the
one infront of averys probably very early nov 5. right after Avery left that morning. It is hard
to believe that they didnt even look in the burn barrel the first day on the lot. I believe someon
in one of the first interviews with the Dassey's, said they had used one of the burn barrels, behind
The Janda Residence probably Nov 3 or so. Something like that. Think it may have been BLD. And
I think it was BoD that said there were 3 barrels back there. not four.
4. The Plates to her car (11/3 late night to 11/8) Found 11/8.
Well we know Sgt. AC called them in. They did not want to create any confusion about that known
recorded call of him running the plates. this gives him an Alibi of this call. Hide them in a
closer car to his home thus the likelihood that people would think he actually was looking at the
car when he called in those plates.
5. The Key (Planted 11/8) found 11/8
Well when nothing is pointing to inside the house in the first
2 days of searching they needed another connection to the car they planted the blood evidence in.
When they first found her car they found the spare key she possibly kept in the car or her purse.
This was a singular key to her car that would usually be attached to the lanyard that was still in
the console of her car. As a photographer I see teresa keeping this in the car or her purse so
when she is on a wedding shoot that may take a long time she can lock her belongins within her
car and wear the extra one around her neck while shes busy shooting an event. The question is
what happen to the other keys?
6. The Bones (11/3 late night to 11/8) Found 11/8 supposedly in the burn pit.
No photo evidence. This was IMPORTANT EVIDENCE. THE MOST IMPORTANT. Teresa herself. Deviated
from protocol. Did not call the coroner. Did not contact an anthropologist to grid the evidence.
There is really no proof that they even found the bones there. All I have seen pictures of are
things that don't add up. The bench and Tire belts in the pit were not even in the pit. There
are unmelted plastic handled and non-burnt wood tools under and around this area she was supposedly
burnt at. Lets not forget the FACT that the bones were moved. They were found in more than one
place, Correct? we just dont know who, when and how they were moved. But at least some of the bones
we can agree were moved, right? The Fact that they were moved, does suggest that the spot moved to
would have the majority of the bones. After they placed the bones in what they thought
was the middle of the pit.
7. The Bullet (planted 3/1/06) found 3/2/06
Such a teeny amount of DNA found and analyst contaminated the manipulation control. Deviated from
Protocol CONTAMINATED even if it was planted it should never have been used anyway. I do think that
JL and AC and two others possibly were in charge of this.
It was dark that night on March 1st that they went to his garage. Think someone could have planted
it easily. Since he had his one Cal. Co. guard dog. Watching not him but others so he could help
the big dogs plant it. There was also no blood visible to the eye on this Fragment of a bullet.
Also this bullet could only be said by ballistics is that it was shot from a .22 like the one found
on his property, that he did not have dna on that either. Also this gun was never sent for finger
printing. Another Deviation of an investigation. Had gun and bullets since Nov 2005. DNA Testing on
the .22 rifle was not SA's.
8. The DNA on the hood (Planted between 11/3/05 - 4/3/06) Found when it was later swabbed april 06.
They knew back in late 2005 when they processed the vehicle at the crime lab that the battery was
disconnected. Suggesting that someone was under her hood. Why would they have not swabbed that hood latch at that time? Then even after the BD confession they still don't swab it for a month. Question I have is they wait so long cause they were so certain that evidence would have TH's DNA on it. If So how did they know. How long before this swabbing did the state find out the test on the bullet was contaminated and may not be able to use that. Culhane's deviateion was dated 4-10-06. Seems like they keep planting things, when the evidence they have is questionable and they know it. The report. she wrote about the bullet was dated May 8, 2005. She did however write a report for Mar 31 2006, just prior to the deviation of protocol. I bet she tested that bullet
before they decided to swab the vehicle. They had a month since the confession to do those things.
Why did they wait so long?
We will also include the phone records that were doctored by her close friend. The first the officers were going on from their printed version of TH's phone bill did not even list her last two calls of the day. Also writing the name of the last caller on a part of the bill that was actually his sisters number.Pointing detectives the very first night to SA. Also there are calls shown on TH's bill that are not in the states summary, no explanation of the 1 an hour call that stopped after 2:41. And they add information about her morning calls that were not shown on her record. So maybe not planted but OMITTED. Such as the person who called in and deleted her VM at 8am on November second.
What was not planted but did not prove murder other than the ones above in question?
The Gun that was said to belong to the man who own the trailer and property.
The Shell Casings that were found all over the garage.
The fact that he may have had a bonfire in a pit meant to have bonfires in.
The fact that he did call her to set up an appointment and then called her an additional 3 times
twice using a privacy feature and once without it after she left. They did have a meeting to
get the pictures done on the car.
What else?
