Does the Defense Team read this site?

[Indigo]

Presumably, KC would get any and all info by way of Baez (at least during her time in jail). There are certainly easy ways to see what the public is saying without visiting Websleuths. At the minimum, the Orlando Sentinel allows comments after their articles. There are many thousands of comments to be seen just by going to their website.

Don't take me wrong, Hot Dogs, I'm not being a Websleuths' flag waver here (although I do love this place.) I'm speaking from long-term experience. Websleuths has been regularly recognized over the years as an important place to read by friend and foe alike.

LE, Prosecution and Defense have been known to tune in--the guilty and the innocent. Orlando Sentinel may give room for opinion, but the meat is in the details and theories and you only get from a well-developed forum with a large membership. Just take a look at how many times the threads have been viewed.

Other forums are watched, too, as we learned in one of the document dumps...I forget the poster's name now but his IP info was requested by LE.

All in all, JB and Co. would be pretty silly not to check this place out. I believe they're smarter than that.

 

[Shalya]

While I'm sure that the lead attorneys in this case don't read here every day, I'm sure that they have people reading for them and printing out relevant posts and/or threads. I agree that it would be silly for them not to keep up with Websleuths... not only for the opinions or leanings of the public, but for the fact that this website has an awful lot of people with an awful lot of information to share.

And I am new, so I can say that without feeling like I am waving the Websleuths flag!

 

[Hot Dogs]

All in all, JB and Co. would be pretty silly not to check this place out. I believe they're smarter than that.

Thanks. What's your opinion on LE investigators and the prosecutors checking this place out?

 

[ThoughtElf]

Your post count has to be higher for you to be considered....but you have been flagged as a future prospect.....:crazy: :blowkiss:

*points to post count* ----> ---^

Pick me! Pick me!

Cool, I could do this all day & get paid for it.

 

[ThoughtElf]

Thanks. What's your opinion on LE investigators and the prosecutors checking this place out?

Are you specifically asking for Indigo's opinion on that, or are others welcome to chime in?

 

[Lovejac]

*points to post count* ----> ---^

Pick me! Pick me!

Cool, I could do this all day & get paid for it.

Tater, don't you dare!

Unless of course the job offer comes from YM heh, heh!

(ssssshhhhh, don't let SS find out, that girl has a jealous streak! :crazy

 

[Hot Dogs]

Are you specifically asking for Indigo's opinion on that, or are others welcome to chime in?

All opinions are welcome. I know others have made comment on this earlier in the thread.

 

[ThoughtElf]

Tater, don't you dare!

Unless of course the job offer comes from YM heh, heh!

(ssssshhhhh, don't let SS find out, that girl has a jealous streak! :crazy

RUH-ROH - now take that back before she blames me somehow! She skeers me.

Back on topic: the original post said defense or prosecution.

I could do either fairly transparently, I think, but I would only do one in this case. You guess which one.

*oh, just take the cookie - you know you'll get it anyway.*

 

[ThoughtElf]

All opinions are welcome. I know others have made comment on this earlier in the thread.

TY.

I believe this is an excellent reference repository for the prosecution, defense and LE, but in varying degrees, and for differing purposes.

Each have different agendas/goals/resources at hand:
1. LE and the SA - have likely got the most resources (not that they aren't stretched) to investigate the case using 'traditional' techniques. Their primary goal will be to find facts to support what the existing evidence already shows. While they may benefit greatly from threads like the ping and text threads, I don't see that SA or LE would post 'leading' questions here. As well, they have a great deal more to lose if they did. That would be all sorts of NOT GOOD.
2. Defense - have less resources available to them for investigative work of any sort, traditional or non-traditional. Their goals differ and there are more of them. For example, they will monitor opinion polls to get a feeling for case weights per issue. As well, threads where contentious issues are debated passionately are a breeding ground for testing "what if's" as a trial run for 'reasonable doubt' arguments they might try, or disregard.

(still 2) Further, the rumour thread must be a delight amongst the many MySpace and FaceBook ones, and all others of the like. Benefits are two-fold: Where can conspiracy doubt be cast, &/or who/where can we deflect attention to today via PR or motions? (JG DNA, for example)

(and more 2) I do feel the defense or informal representatives might post here. As I posted before, 'honing their skills' in the case of students, and trying to find a tip for the point of the spear for the more experienced defense members.

IMO, some might be pegged as part of JB's team who really aren't. They're just fighting the fight for constitutional rights and guilty until proven innocent. Straight up posters, you know their stance, and it is right out there.

It is the other ones, as noted in many posts above, who embed the ''what-ifs" just barely, thinly disguised that lend us to believe they're here - and heck ya, they're posting. And they can't get in the kind of 'NOT GOOD FOR THIS CASE OR OUR SIDE OF THE PROFESSION' that the SA & LE could.

I also surmise that several of have been as disgruntled in the process of this endeavour with the many clever WS'ers as several here have been with those posters. :wink:

All's fair in love & posting, so long as TOS isn't broken; then some learn, some feed, some breed, and some make sport of it as a chew-toy for the brain.

 

[Indigo]

TY.

I believe this is an excellent reference repository for the prosecution, defense and LE, but in varying degrees, and for differing purposes.

Each have different agendas/goals/resources at hand:
1. LE and the SA - have likely got the most resources (not that they aren't stretched) to investigate the case using 'traditional' techniques. Their primary goal will be to find facts to support what the existing evidence already shows. While they may benefit greatly from threads like the ping and text threads, I don't see that SA or LE would post 'leading' questions here. As well, they have a great deal more to lose if they did. That would be all sorts of NOT GOOD.
2. Defense - have less resources available to them for investigative work of any sort, traditional or non-traditional. Their goals differ and there are more of them. For example, they will monitor opinion polls to get a feeling for case weights per issue. As well, threads where contentious issues are debated passionately are a breeding ground for testing "what if's" as a trial run for 'reasonable doubt' arguments they might try, or disregard.

(still 2) Further, the rumour thread must be a delight amongst the many MySpace and FaceBook ones, and all others of the like. Benefits are two-fold: Where can conspiracy doubt be cast, &/or who/where can we deflect attention to today via PR or motions? (JG DNA, for example)

(and more 2) I do feel the defense or informal representatives might post here. As I posted before, 'honing their skills' in the case o students, and trying to find a tip for the point of the spear for the more experienced defense members.

IMO, some might be pegged as part of JB's team who really aren't. They're just fighting the fight for constitutional rights and guilty until proven innocent. Straight up posters, you know their stance, and it is right out there.

It is the other ones, as noted in many posts above, who embed the ''what-ifs" just barely, thinly disguised that lend us to believe they're here - and heck ya, they're posting.

I also surmise that several of have been as disgruntled in the process of this endeavour as several here have been with them. :wink:

All's fair in love & posting, so long as TOS isn't broken, then some learn, some feed, some breed, and some make sport of it as a chew-toy for the brain.

Great post, PotatoHead! :clap: By the way...anyone who can change their facial features at will has unfair advantage...and is so not in need of a life! lol.

 

[OneLostGrl]

May I pick which life I 'get'?

Wouldn't that be nice?

 

[ThoughtElf]

Great post, PotatoHead! :clap: By the way...anyone who can change their facial features at will has unfair advantage...and is so not in need of a life! lol.

Yes, but apparently, I put the wrong lips on for my Super Bowl commercial. Lisa Rinna anyone? So not me. (And never forget those facial features get stored in SpudHead's butt!)

Wouldn't that be nice?

Wouldn't it though? :blowkiss::blowkiss:

 

[drip~drop]

Yes, Surely Casey has at least a couple of pictures of Zanny!

Zanny doesn't show up on film. :chicken:

 

[OneLostGrl]

Has anyone gotten any job offers yet from the prosecution or defense??

I sure haven't. :boohoo:

I've gotten a couple death threats here and there for talking but that's about it LOL. J/K- no death threats!

 

[carrie]

I don't think that had anything to do with this site. There's no doubt that even the most inept of attorneys would have requested this information.

I was thinking the same thing. Any attorney who needed to have it suggested to him/her to ask for that evidence would have to be unbelievably clueless. I don't think JB is that "inept."

 

[Indigo]

Yes, but apparently, I put the wrong lips on for my Super Bowl commercial. Lisa Rinna anyone? So not me. (And never forget those facial features get stored in SpudHead's butt!)



Wouldn't it though? :blowkiss::blowkiss:

:rolling::rolling::rolling:

 

[BonKai]

As a member of W/S I find the play between prosecution & defense keeps members on thier toes even if one of the teans always wants to take thier bat and ball and go home. I hope defense reads here and throws out food for thought. I"m sure we throw it right back, leaving them scratching there heads as to what might work next. The play by play moments comming from spokespersons & us reacting to them is what keeps us lurking & posting. Bring them all online! I'm also not a defense plant if anyone cares to know.

I agree. Discussions and, most importantly, sleuthing would not take place without conflict.
If KC's account(s) of what happened rang true, most of us would not be here. We would not be interested in cell pings, IMs, receipts, etc...

 

[BonKai]

Zanny doesn't show up on film. :chicken:

:floorlaugh:

 

[passionflower]

I bet everyone does, but I hope LE and prosecutor gets some of our help!!!