- Joined
- Oct 29, 2012
- Messages
- 7,794
- Reaction score
- 38,646
All of this is not surprising to me. Sievers last hope was to blame it on the 2 stooges ( JR and Wayne). I hope all 3 so called men rot in hell. Teresa deserves justice!
Why not just wait for opening statements, and "see" how you would vote on guilty or not guilty. You could be "our" anonymous juror!![]()
What would you guys recommend to get up to speed with the case?
Wade though the discovery? Or just wait for prosecution opening? I read a bit of the discovery thread and realised I had read a lot of this before. The whole business with the hitmen driving to Florida and leaving a trail of evidence.
What dummies
What would you guys recommend to get up to speed with the case?
Wade though the discovery? Or just wait for prosecution opening? I read a bit of the discovery thread and realised I had read a lot of this before. The whole business with the hitmen driving to Florida and leaving a trail of evidence.
What dummies
Hiya MrJitty, bbm. you asked about a pertinent source (reading/video) to get up to speed on this case...and then wrote, "....What would you guys recommend to get up to speed with the case?
Wade though the discovery? Or just wait for prosecution opening? I read a bit of the discovery thread and realised I had read a lot of this before. The whole business with the hitmen driving to Florida and leaving a trail of evidence.
What dummies
Great observation NINER. That would be the logical sequence. I think getting a conviction against JRR first is essential. MS's attorneys get more delay time, forensic info, see how jurors respond to CWW testimony and strengths/weaknesses in prosecution's case. Something about "that" doesn't seem fair. Frankly, I feel odd using the term "fair" when it comes to prosecuting men who attacked/conspired and killed a beautiful young Mother.So it might look like Rodgers trial before Sievers....
Hiya MrJitty, bbm. you asked about a pertinent source (reading/video) to get up to speed on this case...and then wrote, "....
the hitmen driving to Florida and leaving a trail of evidence.
What dummies" That's a pretty good summation. Hmmm, I'm thinking you are already up to speed!!
Something about the Florida Walmart surveillance photos of the interstate Ninja assassins stopping to pick up souvenirs makes the word "dummies" abundantly appropriate.
View attachment 200495
And from court site - Sievers' defense files motion for continuance of trial.
https://matrix.leeclerk.org/DocView/Doc?request=35743745&eCode=6XtCXb802A+0bBuC+ItqzhAkDhIW8ty/8KmQCYOQ+dT6zqxwsSkXEzty1Dq6gnjSJ1VloYVdB4sw12noOruNUQ==
LB immense thanks for the link. I decided to read it (in depth) even though Teresa's name was "blacked out"/redacted over and over again. I find the "redacting" of the deceased's name abhorrent... almost as if they are trying to totally erase her identity. (Personally, I wanted to scream, she has a name and it isn't Jane Doe or victim!!) They also don't want details on defensive wounds, how Teresa was killed or photos of the aftermath either. Basically, they (ie defense) admits (or is "a given") that CWW was there and committed the murder....but now prove MS is involved. Ugh, anyone have an idea on how a judge will rule on these requests? I think "this strategy" will backfire on the defense. If the defense wants to paint CWW as a maniacal mastermind monster who did this all on his own volition, then leave the photos in!! Let the world see what this creep did! Oh yeah, one little draw back....he is MS's endearing lifelong friend, brother-at-heart, who would do anything for Mark. Hmmm, I may have to rethink this.And another motion, this time to exclude crime scene evidence.
https://matrix.leeclerk.org/Cases/Search
Great observation NINER. That would be the logical sequence. I think getting a conviction against JRR first is essential. MS's attorneys get more delay time, forensic info, see how jurors respond to CWW testimony and strengths/weaknesses in prosecution's case. Something about "that" doesn't seem fair. Frankly, I feel odd using the term "fair" when it comes to prosecuting men who attacked/conspired and killed a beautiful young Mother.
Great memory IQ. I'd totally forgotten about that.Oh LEGALLY BLAND... great info! As the list of "requested exclusions" of evidence and photos from the crime scene grows, I have been wondering (for days!) if MS's attorneys do not want the picture of the shredding machine and the documents that were halfway-shredded??? I enlarged the picture and noticed a partially shredded "Long Term Disability Policy" sticking out of the top of the machine. (Hopefully my eyes/recollections are not deceiving me) It looked as if the thickness of the policy jammed up the shredder. Just thinking out loud here now and injecting my personal opinion....But isn't amazing MS decided his spouse no longer needed a Long Term Disability Policy?? I wonder if some of the evidence will be the date he quit paying on the disability policy? Hmmm, and yet he kept 4 million in life insurance policies in force.
For Pete's sake, if he was not involved in the crime, why would he want ANY photos of the crime scene ommitted? Wouldn't a husband want any and all information released if it helped to convict the killers of his children's Mother??? (I guess he could accuse CWW & JRR of messing up his office and jamming his shredder, too!)