No doubt, the other Emory pt is sole about confidentiality . For us, confidentiality was golden . And if you think about it how could, in psych, any trust be devolved if the pt did not know that whatever warts they want to reveal, are between the clinician and the pt only.
We reviewed it during assessment the the notion. IN our field way before Hippo it was in place and done. During marital therapy, after initial sessions , it was always good to have one individual with each individual.
Unless the partner signed a release nothing in that session could be discussed when joint sessions resumes. Husband tended to a much more difficult time with that notion! “Its my wife”. I always encouraged, a was able to, with few exceptions have the husband see its importance. The wives more readily signed the release! Are we together to foster secrets?
Witt the exception of treatment team, as colleagues, we could not speak with a pt prior clinician without consent. Only time that was breached , was duty to warn,, danger to others self etc.
The top four golden: sex with a pt, failure to warn, breach of confidentiality, and dual relationships (knowing someone socially and working with them,- having any kind of relationship with them ).
In public, if we passed a pt at the grocery store we were not allowed to acknowledge them unless the pt approached and interacted with us first. Think about it – a therapist says hi and the person they are with asks who was that.........
All of us found Hippa in pain , cause we had been doing it since Freud! As is typical the govt turned it into 484 pages!
For us a sentence worked! It is forbidden to discuss any treatment with anyone with a signed consent to do so.
See how nice, short, consist that principle is!! They turned it into everyone had to take Ceu's regarding it 3 hour trainings : For : It is forbidden to discuss any treatment with anyone without a signed consent to do so.
Only the govt!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
IMO, In this instance there might be some who might say it could impact me. How could not honoring a pt right to confidential impact another individuals chance of contracting Ebola. IMO. It cant, and IMO confidentiality in this instance, is not any different in tis sitution.
In actuality, with Ebola, and the way the media has presented the situation in all liklihood the release could put the pt in danger. I have no doubt, that shortly this going to explode,much like HIV, into hate, spray painting pt houses with we dont want you here etcetc etc. Mass hysteria,wiht IMO, no need for. IMO when all this starts the indivudulas should be prosecuted as commiting a hate crime.
The media might try to bring regarding the aforementioned statement – once again – its just the media doing what it does –educated the public, and in this situation, just like HIV , they impacted the ability to get what behaviors one must engage to increase/decrease livelihood of of contracting.
IMO,Fear always breeds panic................