Hospital officials in Connecticut quarantined a Yale University student researcher with Ebola-like symptoms, but state officials said Thursday that the patient tested negative for the disease, CBS Hartford affiliate WFSB-TV reports.
I tend to agree as I watched an interview with someone from one of the affected Africa communities and they were saying that the wild dogs there were highly suspected of transmitting the disease to others.
We of course dont have a lot of places with wild packs of dogs but I do think its wise to quaranteen the dog that was with the infected people and test it up to 21 days. The person said you can test the dogs to see if they are carrying it, so no need to kill the dogs.
Well fortunately it isn't - and the spread so far, although utterly heart-breaking confirms that it cannot be airborne (for now anyway) or the rate and spread of infection would be many, many times greater than it is.
I sure hope the wedding dress shop owner has good insurance. I can't think he'd be able to sell any of those dresses after public fear and decontamination crews are finished with them.
Right? I'm curious as to why the window of suspicion towards possible cases is growing.
What irritates is people repeating that dogs an cats do not pass on diseases to humans and that there is absolutely no evidence that dogs could carry Ebola or pass it on. There is evidence - it may not be overwhelming but it does exist and to say it does not when it ha been posted on here several times isn't really right is it?
Hospital officials in Connecticut quarantined a Yale University student researcher with Ebola-like symptoms, but state officials said Thursday that the patient tested negative for the disease, CBS Hartford affiliate WFSB-TV reports.
The scary thing is, going back to my post #555, if this were actually "airborne," that's exactly who would need to be quarantined. Everyone in that terminal, and everyone in the Cleveland terminal.
The dogs in the villages are probably eating infected meat-- whether from bush animals or from dead humans (gross). IIRC, the article brought this up and said they don't know what part, if any or how much the dogs eating infected meat had ( I think they also mentioned dogs licking up bodily fluids too)...
http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/20...se-exposed-to-ebola-might-not-be-long-enough/
Drexel Study Claims 21 Day Quarantine For Ebola Might Not Be Long Enough
October 16, 2014 12:12 PM
snipped
The research, which was conducted by Professor Charles Haas, PhD, and used data from both previous outbreaks and the first nine months of the current outbreak, claims that there is still a .1 to 12% risk of that person developing the virus if they are released from quarantine after 21 days.
“In other words from 0.1 to 12% of the time, an individual case will have a greater incubation time than 21 days,” Haas concludes.
BBM
I wonder why they are trying to contact all 5 flights worth of people. Perhaps she did throw up on that plane and we dont know about it?
I can understand all people on her flight and maybe the people sitting in her seat isle for next flights but I dont understand all passengers from all 5 flights.
That's good to hear. The other article linked earlier stated that these students were never even around anyone with ebola to begin with.
There is EVIDENCE that dogs are responsible for the spread of Ebola? Wow...first I have heard of this.
Human Transmitted Diseases (not in any particular order): TB, HIV, Hepatitis A, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, Influenza, Cholera, Typhoid, Smallpox, Chickenpox, Diphtheria, Polio, Rubella, Shingles, MRSA.
And how many of those are likely to be transmitted by a dog????? Errrrrmmmmm.....none....except maybe MRSA and that is IF a contagious human infects them.
Would you support travel restrictions for dogs arriving from infected areas? Human travel restrictions are obviously out of the question but maybe canine travel restrictions should be in order? That might fix the problem!