- Joined
- Jul 27, 2008
- Messages
- 13,866
- Reaction score
- 67,007
I guess that answers our questions about the deputy that responded - it couldn't have been AR as he was fired and you can't discipline a deputy that is already fired.
I think the A's may be already thinking of a law suit..Their GD should've been found 4 months sooner but wasn't because LE was negligent..Do they have a case??
Well ALL they had to do was tell where she was. I believe they knew and if not then make their murdering daughter tell. It is not LE's fault that no one thought KC would dump Caylee like garbage.
He does need to be disciplined though for such actions if it is true.
I think the A's may be already thinking of a law suit..Their GD should've been found 4 months sooner but wasn't because LE was negligent..Do they have a case??
Hi Mysteryview, I hadn't heard the cop didn't want to walk out into the water to look into the bagI thought that was when the cop got scared of snakes. I guess the only bag I heard about a bag is it was out by the road, and you don't have to walk thru water to get that. :blowkiss:
I think the A's may be already thinking of a law suit..Their GD should've been found 4 months sooner but wasn't because LE was negligent..Do they have a case??
Well ALL they had to do was tell where she was. I believe they knew and if not then make their murdering daughter tell. It is not LE's fault that no one thought KC would dump Caylee like garbage.
He does need to be disciplined though for such actions if it is true.
Inside Edition had a little bit of his interview on GMA on tonight. Kronk said the officer was rude and more or less blew him off. Said that he evidently didn't want to walk out into the water to look into the bag.
Considering that LE knew about the child missing in the neighborhood I would have thought the officer would have shown more interest. It doesn't surprise me that he is facing disciplinary charges, what does surprise me is that they haven't already happened. After all it has been more than a month since they interviewed Kronk and they said then that they would be looking into his allegations.
No, they lack standing to sue.
Agreed! but where's the proof the A's knew (so far there's none) & I don't see how they can be held accountable for failing to make KC tell..That leaves me still thinking there may be possible reasonable cause to pursue a suit against LE.
Don't get me wrong..I don't want this to happen & will truly be SICK if it does.
JVM just learned that the deputy will probably face disciplinary action for being "rude", etc.
Good.
I'm going to go look for a transcript of the interview that RK gave about his experience with LE. He said that the LE that responded to the scene told him that he was wasting tax payers money. I do remember him saying that. Wonder if that's why on one of the calls RK said "I don't want to waste taxpayers money?" Anyone have a quick link? Pretty Please?![]()
That officer makes Le look terrible ,keystone kops come to mind.If that officer did his job the first time out there might have been a known cause of death and who knows maybe even finger prints on her body.
Her remains are not the only item that could have provided useful evidence. The entire scene and anything else that had been left there could have provided clues that perhaps were moved and faded with time.I agree that the officer should have done his job, but I doubt a cause of death could have been determined at that point. It only takes about 2 weeks for a body to completely skeletonize in hot weather. I'm sure poor Caylee was already bones by the time anybody knew she was even missing.![]()