Where does it say anything of the sort in the court document? What doctor you claim decided she was not brain dead? I dont' see anything of the sort.
I know this was not for me, but I am curious as well. Surely not Byrne? I don't think he counts.
Where does it say anything of the sort in the court document? What doctor you claim decided she was not brain dead? I dont' see anything of the sort.
Re #517
And...?
The Court's final decision was what.
~jmo~
An MD on twitter says this is the location - Riverhead Patch
It is not even built yet.
No, I strongly disagree! This family would rather have their daughter alive and well over money. The reason for the feeding tube is that Jahi doesn't have the consciousness to swallow solid food. She needs nutrition to keep her body going and they need to be able to transport her. NG-tubes can be easily dislodged, so a G-tube is preferable, and is considered a minor surgery.
"the court found that Drs. Heidersbach and Shanahan did not satisfy the requirements of Health and Safety Code Section 7180 and 7181”
The court found means that it was the final decision.
"the court found that Drs. Heidersbach and Shanahan did not satisfy the requirements of Health and Safety Code Section 7180 and 7181
The court found means that it was the final decision.
But state law considers brain death the same as "death." And Caplan said Children's Hospital doctors got into an unusual position when they didn't simply take Jahi off the ventilator the first time the EEG came back negative. Instead, they gave the family more than a few minutes to say goodbye.
And in that time, a slippery slope was created, Caplan said. He asked rhetorically if the Jahi case now will have people running "to court if they refuse to accept ...death?"
Absolutely nothing in what you just quoted here suggests any physican decided she was not brain dead. "Did not satisfy the requirements" simply means the physicans were not independent enough per judge's view since both had privileges at the same hospital.
Here is the hospital's letter which also states that only 2 of it's staff found Jahi brain dead. Then on 12/23 Dr Fisher agreed. On 12/24 they got the TRO to keep her on until 12/30.
The family states that she is responding to them, that must be enough of a doubt to a court of law to extend another week.
Wouldn't it be easy to just have a brain scan done?
Thanks, it appears they are trying to find anyone that they have connections with in the area to take her. I just read that they need a doctor to write orders for therapy for her. Hmmm....
IMO, this says it all...
ok guys, I'm not on here to argue with anyone. I thought more of you would be interested in what I found in the documents.
I'm really surprised that some of you aren't seeing anything other than Jahi should be taken off the vent.
IMO I think this is a bigger hospital mistake than originally reported.
UPPP
uvulopalatopharyngoplasty
http://www.calsleep.com/services-uppp-california-sleep-doctors-bay-area.html
reduction of bilateral inferior mucousal turbinates
http://www.sinuscarecenter.com/treat/surgery_turbinate.htm
Sent from my SGH-T679 using Tapatalk 2
I don't agree with that quote at all. Doctors are required by state law to give family some reasonably short amount to accept it. They aren't supposed to turn the ventillator off the minute EEG came back negative. So I don't think the hospital created this situation by not turning the vent off the minute EEG came back negative.
Why would a facility that take patients with TBI, that are mostly out patient, with a new long term care facilty, that is a converted house? Jahi does not appear to fit their criteria from what I read. Interesting.