OK, obviously I could not stay away after all. And I am...appalled. This poor child, her poor body, that familial denial could go to such an extent. To me (meaning this is MY opinion, only) this has passed through sad, to tragic, to macabre and now we are entering into the realm of....I don't even have the word. Vivisection would be for experimental procedures performed on a living body, but Jahi isn't living (according to the state of California, the hospital, the original court, the independent doctor, the coroner, etc.) so what do you call it when futile procedures are performed on a human body artificially forced to maintain heartbeat and respiration by machines?
Maybe it isn't vivisection, exactly. But to me, this is a travesty, a violation of this poor dead child.
And I know many people won't give weight to this, but what of the caretakers? They know this child is medically and legally dead, and they are still going to try to give her excellent care and comfort to the best of their abilities. It must be mentally & emotionally anguishing. At least, it would be for me.
I understand pain, I understand denial, I understand familial anguish for a child lost too young--when I was a kid, a cousin of mine was trapped under a piece of farm equipment on his family's farm and horribly burned/crushed, his father tried to pull him out and was in turn badly injured but my cousin could not survive. My uncle could never come to terms with his son's death and inability to save him and eventually took his own life. It was an accident, and my uncle couldn't have done anything, and yet he let his grief destroy him, and in turn destroyed most of his family. You have to accept tragedy and let it pass through you without taking up a permanent residence, or you are not honoring the life you are grieving, or life itself. At least that is what I believe.