gngr~snap
Verified Pediatric Nurse Georgia
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2010
- Messages
- 14,380
- Reaction score
- 15,505
I respect your opinion. This is kind of how I look at it. Technology will continue to advance. If at some point, technology would ever advance, although highly unlikely, to the point where a person who suffers heart failure and some kind of artificial machine can be attached to continue the circulation of blood, would society want to keep there loved ones at home or in a facility, being somewhat preserved for an indefinite or endless amount of time? Would the deceased want that?
This is just delaying the decay and breakdown of other organs. IMO
If we could embalm or taxidermy someone and they would never decay, would some want to take them home and sit them in a corner chair? I really do think a lot of people would want to do this and I'm not joking.
Haven't they? Well not taxidermy, but corpses have remained in the homes of their beloved for years after their death and they have been found mummified.
I remember a story about a man and two female relatives. I think he was "off", but he kept cashing their soc sec checks...
As the little boy in the state farm "mime" commercial says it...
C R E E P Y !
Sent from my SGH-T679 using Tapatalk 2