Dude.Wait.WHAT?!?!? bbm -- Was this a real tweet from uncle? :sigh:
It's at the very top of his twitter page where his pictures are! I don't know how to do a screenshot on here (newbie) but here is the link... https://twitter.com/_iamOMARI
Dude.Wait.WHAT?!?!? bbm -- Was this a real tweet from uncle? :sigh:
It's at the very top of his twitter page where his pictures are! I don't know how to do a screenshot on here (newbie) but here is the link... https://twitter.com/_iamOMARI
On the twitter it shows Omari and someone else in front of microphones. They are seated in front of a brick wall with what look like posters or signs. Does anyone know where this is?
Historically, most of California's wind power output has been in three primary regions: Altamont Pass Wind Farm (east of San Francisco); Tehachapi Pass Wind Farm (south east of Bakersfield) and San Gorgonio Pass Wind Farm (near Palm Springs, east of Los Angeles).[3] A fourth area, the Montezuma Hills of Solano County, was developed in 2005–2009, with the large Shiloh Wind Power Plant.
Jahi McMath arrives at long-term care facility, says family
Her uncle, Omari Seeley, said Monday that she traveled by ground and that there were no complications in the transfer, suggesting Jahi may be in California.
bbm; http://www.cbsnews.com/news/jahi-mcmath-arrives-at-long-term-care-facility/
On the twitter it shows Omari and someone else in front of microphones. They are seated in front of a brick wall with what look like posters or signs. Does anyone know where this is?
SanFrancisco maybe: USCF at Mount Zion
On the twitter it shows Omari and someone else in front of microphones. They are seated in front of a brick wall with what look like posters or signs. Does anyone know where this is?
Jahi is a very sweet girl. She was very shy, and she smiled all the time. I can still see her smile. I'm just still praying that one day I'll be able to see her smile again," said Sealey, while holding back mounting tears. "She is everybody's favorite. She just had one of those personalities that when you meet her, you just kind of gravitated towards her."
I'm just gonna guess there is no way in hello that UCSF has anything to do with her or her family.
HELLO NO.
http://piersmorgan.blogs.cnn.com/20...ll-be-able-to-see-her-smile-again/?hpt=pm_mid
Didn't he just see her smile the other day?
I have a legal question for those legally-educated.
Dolan is a personal-injury attorney. He's the guy with the biggest ad on the back page of the phone book. Usually, these guys are pretty penny-ante. They thrive on out-of-court settlements with insurance companies for fairly modest amounts for all sorts of injuries claimed and perceived by the plaintiff. It's a stupid game and everyone knows what goes on.
This case seems to be way out of his league. He may be in it for the massive publicity, which will guarantee a very nice living in the future with many more of the penny-ante personal injury lawsuits. He is also likely in it to further fund lobbying for reversal of the $250K malpractice cap.
Various legal sources have been mentioned here that seem to think his Violation of Privacy / Religous Rights etc will not prevail.
1. I believe that suit was already filed and was at least part of what went on with the Federal Court magistrate on Jan 3. Am I correct in this?
2. As this would seem to be premature to me, as the death certificate has not been filed, nor has any investigation revealed the exact method and means of death. - can he file amendements to that suit already recorded?
3. He said he would not pursue malpractice (because it's "chump change" according to Uncle), so I assume he will go for wrongful death-type suit. My guess is that if he does this, there will be a "settlement of undisclosed terms" and that the family will receive far, far less than the $30 million floated out there.
4. In a settlement, the money is awarded to plaintiffs. I assume that would be the mother, and possibly grandmother, and/ or father. Do the plaintiffs need to be specifically identified, or can a "family" be the plaintiff. I'm wondering how much legal standing Uncle Omari even has in this. Any info?
:yes: I specifically recall him saying at the PC yesterday, that she smiled as she left.
I guess he misconstrued that.![]()
I have a legal question for those legally-educated.
Dolan is a personal-injury attorney. He's the guy with the biggest ad on the back page of the phone book. Usually, these guys are pretty penny-ante. They thrive on out-of-court settlements with insurance companies for fairly modest amounts for all sorts of injuries claimed and perceived by the plaintiff. It's a stupid game and everyone knows what goes on.
This case seems to be way out of his league. He may be in it for the massive publicity, which will guarantee a very nice living in the future with many more of the penny-ante personal injury lawsuits. He is also likely in it to further fund lobbying for reversal of the $250K malpractice cap.
Various legal sources have been mentioned here that seem to think his Violation of Privacy / Religous Rights etc will not prevail.
1. I believe that suit was already filed and was at least part of what went on with the Federal Court magistrate on Jan 3. Am I correct in this?
2. As this would seem to be premature to me, as the death certificate has not been filed, nor has any investigation revealed the exact method and means of death. - can he file amendements to that suit already recorded?
3. He said he would not pursue malpractice (because it's "chump change" according to Uncle), so I assume he will go for wrongful death-type suit. My guess is that if he does this, there will be a "settlement of undisclosed terms" and that the family will receive far, far less than the $30 million floated out there.
4. In a settlement, the money is awarded to plaintiffs. I assume that would be the mother, and possibly grandmother, and/ or father. Do the plaintiffs need to be specifically identified, or can a "family" be the plaintiff. I'm wondering how much legal standing Uncle Omari even has in this. Any info?
The family cannot generically be the plaintiff. Each party is named individually, even if they are represented by a guardian (her sibs, for example). Afaik, the uncle has no direct interest in the recovery. That should only be immediate family members.
all jmo