Donjeta
Adji Desir, missing from Florida
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2009
- Messages
- 19,246
- Reaction score
- 630
This thread is at least one place where we had the same discussion earlier.
Family wants to keep life support for girl brain dead after tonsil surgery - Page 55 - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community
An expert from a different county (who doesn't know the case details and is just speaking generally) says that the medical records might be enough to determine cause of death.
In that same link the people from the particular coroner's office that is actually concerned with the case, and, I presume, more familiar with the details, are quoted saying that they have not been able to determine cause of death and may not be able to do so because the autopsy has been delayed.
Who do you think is likely to know better?
I'm sorry for saying you conveniently ignored links but you seem to have missed this information in the link you quoted yourself, previously quoted in this thread:
Here it is again, for reference: http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/loca...licates-Cause-of-Death-Experts-238945011.html
Pending an autopsy implies that there will be an autopsy. Talking about the autopsy being delayed implies that there will be an autopsy. An autopsy which is yet to take place implies that there will be an autopsy.
Here's a link that was posted in a previous thread you participated in but maybe you missed seeing it:
http://edition.cnn.com/2013/12/17/health/california-girl-brain-dead/
"The longer we wait..." What are they waiting for? An autopsy.
These quotes also all clearly imply that the coroner's office were planning to have an autopsy all along. (This is from December 18th, a week or so after the surgery.)
The only reason time is critical is because it changes things for the autopsy.
If they were only going to look at her medical records and ask the attending doctors what went wrong and determine the cause of death based on that, the quotes wouldn't make any sense. The coroner pathologist is relevant to an autopsy. It wouldn't make any difference that her surgical wounds are healing if an autopsy wasn't needed to determine cause of death.
It's quite clear they wanted to do an autopsy all along.
It depends. What rights are you referring to? A right to make certain medical decisions for their living child? A right to forbid an autopsy that is considered necessary for the coroner's legally mandatory investigation of death? A right to decide that their deceased child didn't die?
Family wants to keep life support for girl brain dead after tonsil surgery - Page 55 - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community
Clearly stated where? I've yet to see where a coroner has requested an autopsy done on Jahi. All of us are certainly free to draw conclusions about the family but I have yet to see any coroner's office demanding an autopsy. Would you please post links? Thanks. I posted a link where an expert opined that medical records might preclude the need for an autopsy. I agree with that possibility.
An expert from a different county (who doesn't know the case details and is just speaking generally) says that the medical records might be enough to determine cause of death.
In that same link the people from the particular coroner's office that is actually concerned with the case, and, I presume, more familiar with the details, are quoted saying that they have not been able to determine cause of death and may not be able to do so because the autopsy has been delayed.
Who do you think is likely to know better?
I'm sorry for saying you conveniently ignored links but you seem to have missed this information in the link you quoted yourself, previously quoted in this thread:
The Alameda County Coroner issued a death certificate for the 13-year-old girl Friday, 23 days after Jahi was declared brain dead, but said the document is incomplete because no cause of death has been determined pending an autopsy, which has yet to take place.
"It does make it more difficult," Alameda County Sheriff's Sgt. J.D. Nelson told NBC Bay Area when asked if delaying an autopsy could affect figuring out how someone died. "It can change a lot of things when the bodily functions continue. In fact, we may not be able to determine a cause of death."
Here it is again, for reference: http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/loca...licates-Cause-of-Death-Experts-238945011.html
Pending an autopsy implies that there will be an autopsy. Talking about the autopsy being delayed implies that there will be an autopsy. An autopsy which is yet to take place implies that there will be an autopsy.
I'm sorry but not only haven't I had this conversation previously, <modsnip> Reporters have issued stories consistently that indicate an autopsy may not be necessary and I haven't seen anything to support your theory that "they" wanted to do it all along. Please don't accuse me of conveniently ignoring links. Thanks.
Here's a link that was posted in a previous thread you participated in but maybe you missed seeing it:
http://edition.cnn.com/2013/12/17/health/california-girl-brain-dead/
"Technically, we can go where the body lies and we can begin our investigation as to the causes of death," the official from the coroner's office said. "We have been gracious and we have allowed the parents and the hospital to maintain the child on life support."
Krigel, the hospital spokeswoman, said that the hospital has no policy about terminating life support. "We work with the family to determine when that will happen," she said in an e-mail. "There are instances when the coroner may request termination, but we always work with the family to respect their wishes."
The official at the coroner's office said time is critical. "When the body is on a ventilator, the body is healing," the official said. "If a medical misadventure occurred, and the body is healing and covering up traces of that misadventure, the coroner pathologist has a more difficult time rendering a cause of death."
The bigger issue is deciding whether it is more important to delay removing the ventilator to give relatives time to grieve or to act quickly to determine the causes of death before continued healing could make it impossible to ascertain those causes, the official said.
"We know the parents want answers, and it is our office that will provide answers if they are available to us," the official said. "The longer we wait, the less susceptible we are to getting the evidence we need to render a cause of death. Time is not on our side, from a medical investigation standpoint."
"The longer we wait..." What are they waiting for? An autopsy.
These quotes also all clearly imply that the coroner's office were planning to have an autopsy all along. (This is from December 18th, a week or so after the surgery.)
The only reason time is critical is because it changes things for the autopsy.
If they were only going to look at her medical records and ask the attending doctors what went wrong and determine the cause of death based on that, the quotes wouldn't make any sense. The coroner pathologist is relevant to an autopsy. It wouldn't make any difference that her surgical wounds are healing if an autopsy wasn't needed to determine cause of death.
It's quite clear they wanted to do an autopsy all along.
This seems to be a case where some of us believe a parent does have a right to make these decisions and other want to obliterate that ability. I will never believe a parent does not have that right.
It depends. What rights are you referring to? A right to make certain medical decisions for their living child? A right to forbid an autopsy that is considered necessary for the coroner's legally mandatory investigation of death? A right to decide that their deceased child didn't die?