BBM.
It is rather
uncommon for hanging victims to urinate or defecate. (This includes both suspension victims, as well as long and short drop victims.)
Additionally, the autopsy report for RZ does not document either defecation or urination at the scene, or evidence of such at the time of autopsy.
This is one source I found to support that.There are a number of other sources that discuss suicide victims from suspension and long and short drop hangings-- none of which mention urination or defecation.
However, one source mentioned long drop suicide hanging at only
1% of all suicidal hangings. I thought that was
very interesting.
http://www.capitalpunishmentuk.org/hanging2.html
I teach critical thinking @ the adult ed.- college level and as part of our work we often examine court case arguments and evidence. I also teach them that any good argument must address ( and solve) counter arguments.
This mod. one of my students is an EMT with over 10 years experience on ambulances in the NY Metro area ( and the night before had a call on a suicide- 38 male). I was discussing this case with him after class. He said a few things that have really made me think- which pertain to this case.
He said that he been to many many suicide scenes- 3 suicide by hangings calls. In all three cases the suicide was naked. 2/3 were naked women. all 3 did lose control of bowels. HE said this is always the case- as he has experienced. HE also said that 2 of them were both naked and bound with ropes. ( he said loose ropes - do tighten force of body weight and gravity ) hmmm:-(
Until now I was in the camp and firm belief that no woman would kill herself naked and that was evidence to support the belief that she was murdered.
I was also in the camp that her religious upbringing would inhibit her views of suicide as a possibility. The same student stated...if she was so distraught-at ms accident- she possibly would have questioned " how could there even be a god if such tragedy exists in the world" Hmmm another one of my favorite arguments dashed.
However, There were key aspects of the case for murder- though that he pointed out were present.
lividity /ligature marks /hair
When he heard lividity in her back and not her legs and feet- His opinion changed and he changed his tune immediately. As we have discussed many times in this forum. He said - the over the top evidence that she did not commit suicide was !-lividity in her back and not in her feet. HE said that this happens immediately- and that if she did hang herself the lividity would be in her feet- not her back due to the lead content in human blood.
HE surmised that she died in a horizontal position and lividity may have set in in such a way that the perps...could not manage the former plan to make it appear that she had hung herself. Between her weight and stiffening- they could possibly not even have gotten the noose into the position to hang her at all. Which may have caused conflicting damage to her neck. This has really made me think ( I also have a long commute) maybe they were dragging her around to try to position her and that is how her feet became caked with mud.
He also mentioned the presence of ligature marks ( as evidence murder not suicide) and paused a very long time in consideration of her long hair underneath it all.
He also said any body functions present at the scene of a death, on the victim are detailed in EMS and Police reports. and found it odd that if this was suicide- by hanging from length of rope there would be.
I though these were very interesting perspectives from the student a very very critical -" critical thinker"
Thank you for letting me share these thoughts on both sides.
Praying for justice for BeckyZ