Maybe So
The one and only
JBean said:The article says generally the idea is to clone the best animals and then use their offspring as a food source. To those of you that are not willing to eat cloned meat, do you feel the same about the offspring of the cloned animals? they would be conceived naturally.
Personally, I don't care one way or the other if they clone food producing animals. But as for their offspring being conceived naturally.... I doubt it.....a lot of livestock (especially cattle) are already bred by artificial insemination rather than natural methods of conception and reproduction.
This allows several cows to be inseminated by one bull at the same time. Saving time and producing more numbers and more widespread offspring of a single bull than could be achieved through natural means of conception. Semen from bulls who produce superior offspring can be shipped all over the country rather than only being used on cows that are on the same farm/ranch. Basically cloning is just the next step in preserving the genes of these superior animals. Producing more superior offspring at a faster rate and improving the breeds and food production at a faster rate. Also, a single outstanding cow can only give birth to 1 (or 2) offspring a year and only for a her fairly short lifespan. Clone a dozen copies of her and you get more chances for outstanding offspring and for years to come.