Five Years Later: FBI to Assist in the Probe, December 2015

Forgive me but I'm not sure what that means. Contents of that bag from the SUV? Or just figurative?
 
Will the FEDS realize the toddlers mother is not in NAMUS? Will the new commis allow the ME to enter it?
 
I assume Burke will have to submit his DNA at some point in time?
 
You know, I'm typically not one of those "conspiracy" type guys, but I find the stash of sexually graphic material in Burke's vehicle, his obstructive behavior regarding the LISK investigation, his known history with prostitutes, along with all the remaining questions about what exactly was going on in Oak Beach that lead to Shannan Gilbert's death to be a little unsettling.

I'm not saying I actually think there's some perverse snuff ring about to be uncovered, or expect that its going to be revealed that Burke was directly involved somehow, but some of the facts surrounding him don't sit well with me (especially the FBI obstruction).
 
Why would JB not want this case solved?

Exactly!

Oh, was this supposed to be rhetorical? Well, maybe he wanted it solved very much and was just grossly incompetent/got a little side-tracked what with all the other (illegal) distractions he had going on. Or, he didn't want it solved (or at least investigated- he probably would have been okay with marking it "solved" should an opportunity have arisen) and if so I personally can't wait to find out all of the interesting reasons why, can you?
 
[video=youtube;_sMtzvyd4sQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_sMtzvyd4sQ[/video]

heres a video of one of the manorville bodies being found. Is that burke that shows up in the suit? Can anyone tell me what is with the sparks at the end?

They must have been grinding something...what??....anyone's guess???
 
There's really no logical explanation for Dr. Hackett's activity post murder than him being involved somehow that night. Just what was he involved in? Who was really at Brewer's that night? They claim only Brewer and the Drifter (who is suspect #1 in my opinion). But then why was Shannan afraid of not only Pak, Brewer and Drifter, but also afraid of the cops being called. Was a police offer at Brewers that night? Was burke there? We have to remember that a lot of what is transpiring with burke now is exactly what Peter has been saying since day 1. The whole story of the duffel bag and the 🤬🤬🤬🤬 was repeated countless times and none of us really paid it much mind. What is the "Party house" that is always referred to in reference to this case as where Burke frequented. Is it Brewer's house or another house down OP? Can anyone elaborate on this party house? What about Hackett's neighbor the LEO. How does he fit in? I would figure that if a dirty copper was at brewer's he knew Hackett from him being an ME. Don't forget the extreme corruption and lies from both the ME and LE in this case all along. I still think the drifter is the SK, but the rest are involved somehow

Not of real importance....but I don't think she was afraid of the police being involved - as she called 911...PAK on the otherhand...
 
Buckeye,

I feel the same way. I'm not convinced that JB was directly involved but it has never set well with me that scpd would not bring in the Fbi for such a high profile case. I think he did not want anyone interviewing sex trade workers. You would think that there would be pressure put on the dept. to solve the case because of the image /tourism
There never has seemed to be any outrage or concern on the part of public leaders to solve this case which has always seemed weird to me.
 
Exactly!

Oh, was this supposed to be rhetorical? Well, maybe he wanted it solved very much and was just grossly incompetent/got a little side-tracked what with all the other (illegal) distractions he had going on. Or, he didn't want it solved (or at least investigated- he probably would have been okay with marking it "solved" should an opportunity have arisen) and if so I personally can't wait to find out all of the interesting reasons why, can you?

I hate to tell you this, but I TOLD YOU SO. You might also ask why certain persons on this Board protested that I was hi-jacking threads. All I have said is the folks should be aware of ALL the information and keep their minds open.
 
Mr. Loeb is quite bold to pop up in the comment section. I do believe what he says, though.
 
I didn't see anything like that when I read through those comments earlier this morning.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
154
Guests online
573
Total visitors
727

Forum statistics

Threads
625,618
Messages
18,507,057
Members
240,827
Latest member
rhannie88
Back
Top