BBM
Looks like Sanford PD is using Florida statue 776.013(3) Justifiable use of force.
(3) A person who is not engaged in an unlawful activity and who is attacked in any other place where he or she has a right to be has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground and meet force with force, including deadly force if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the commission of a forcible felony.
Now if GZ was doing something illegal(assault?)when he confronted Trayvon, this statue would not apply.
http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes...ng=&URL=0700-0799/0776/Sections/0776.013.html
Wouldn't that hold true for Tray? After all, he had a legal right to be where he was. If GZ assaulted Tray first, wouldn't the law be inclined to go his way? The problem is that GZ survived and Tray didn't so we will never know Tray's side of the story.
I want to know what the forensics tell us about evidence of a fight on Tray's body. I'm suspicious of what GZ says and wonder about the indications of a fight on his person. One of the stories said there was blood on the back of GZ's shirt - whose blood? How did it get there?
I could see GZ rolling around, roughing himself up once he realized he needed a reason to have shot this young man. If there are no marks at all on Tray, that would be a good reason to doubt GZ's claims. How could a smaller man do all that damage to the much larger GZ without leaving some evidence on the smaller person? MOO, of course.